Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:08 PM - Antenna Followup (kearney)
     2. 07:13 PM - Re: Antenna Followup (Kelly McMullen)
     3. 07:54 PM - Re: Antenna Followup (kearney)
 
 
 

Message 1


					INDEX
 Back to Main INDEX
					NEXT
 Skip to NEXT Message
	LIST
 Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
		SENDER
 Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message

      
      
Time: 
07:08:21 PM PST US
Subject: 
Antenna Followup
From: 
"kearney" <kearney@shaw.ca>
      
      
      Hi
      
      I have another antenna follow up question.  If I install a Company bent whip antenna,
      is there any reason I can't use it for two comm radios through the use
      of a splitter? 
      
      
      Cheers
      
      Les
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=468136#468136
      
      

Message 2


					INDEX
 Back to Main INDEX
				PREVIOUS
 Skip to PREVIOUS Message
					NEXT
 Skip to NEXT Message
	LIST
 Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
		SENDER
 Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message

      
      
Time: 
07:13:14 PM PST US
Subject: 
Re: Antenna Followup
From: 
Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com>
      
      
      Yes. There is no reliable way to isolate the transmitter on one com from 
      the receiver on the other com, creating a likely hazard of frying the 
      receiver on one while transmitting on the other.
      Just install 2 bent whip antennas, installed as far apart as you can 
      conveniently get them.
      
      On 4/7/2017 7:06 PM, kearney wrote:
      >
      > Hi
      >
      > I have another antenna follow up question.  If I install a Company bent whip
      antenna, is there any reason I can't use it for two comm radios through the use
      of a splitter?
      >
      >
      > Cheers
      >
      > Les
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=468136#468136
      >
      >
      
      

Message 3


					INDEX
 Back to Main INDEX
				PREVIOUS
 Skip to PREVIOUS Message
					NEXT
 Skip to NEXT Message
	LIST
 Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
		SENDER
 Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message

      
      
Time: 
07:54:40 PM PST US
Subject: 
Re: Antenna Followup
From: 
"kearney" <kearney@shaw.ca>
      
      
      Hmmm
      
      That sounds way too logical. But I guess two bent whip Comants is the way to go.
      
      
      Thanks Kelly
      
      Cheers 
      
      Les
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=468138#468138
      
      








Other Matronics Email List Services




Post A New Message
  
rv10-list@matronics.com
UN/SUBSCRIBE
  
http://www.matronics.com/subscription
List FAQ
  
http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
Web Forum Interface To Lists
  
http://forums.matronics.com
Matronics List Wiki
  
http://wiki.matronics.com
7-Day List Browse
  
http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
Browse RV10-List Digests
  
http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
Browse Other Lists
  
http://www.matronics.com/browse
Live Online Chat!
  
http://www.matronics.com/chat
Archive Downloading
  
http://www.matronics.com/archives
Photo Share
  
http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
Other Email Lists
  
http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
Contributions
  
http://www.matronics.com/contribution









These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.




-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --