Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:32 AM - Re: Re: Sun Visor (Tim Olson)
     2. 05:41 AM - Re: Re: Sun Visor (Tim Olson)
     3. 11:48 AM - Re: Sun Visor (Bob Turner)
     4. 03:11 PM - First Conditional (Vernon Franklin)
     5. 03:47 PM - Re: First Conditional (Bob Turner)
     6. 03:53 PM - Re: First Conditional (Bob Turner)
     7. 07:01 PM - Re: First Condition (Kelly McMullen)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Ah sure.  So it=99s there but just that the email viewers can=99
      t see it.
      That makes sense, thanks Lenny!
      Tim
      
      > On May 25, 2018, at 11:18 PM, Lenard Iszak <lenard@rapiddecision.com> wrot
      e:
      > 
      > It does show on the web:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=480401
      > 
      > 
      > Lenny
      > 
      > 
      >> On May 25, 2018, at 11:54 PM, Bob Turner <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu> wrote:
      >> 
      >> 
      >> Help! I see the photo. Posted on TinyPics. Any ideas?
      >> 
      >> --------
      >> Bob Turner
      >> RV-10 QB
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> Read this topic online here:
      >> 
      >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=480408#480408
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listhttp://forum======
      ==========================
      ====================;     - NEW MATR
      ONICS LIST WIKI -
      >> _nbsp; --> http://wiki.matronic==============
      ============             - Lnbsp;                   
         -Matt Dralle, Ltronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contrib
      ution
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Bob,
      That really isn=99t too bad for a one off at least.  It could very eas
      ily be improved on and probably end up being a pretty decent product that co
      uld be mass produced for the RV10 without a lot of work.
      
      A block of black Delrin for the block,
      Made much smaller and cut to both clamp around the bar and hold the dowel al
      l in one piece.  Then a dowel made of the same or similar black plastic, or e
      ven aluminum painted, and some nice smoked plexi attached, all with black sc
      rews. 
      
      The only downside at that point over some of the others would be that by cen
      ter mounting you can=99t swing them to the side window.
      
      Anyway, with a little effort that could be tweaked and made to not even look
       much like a DIY system.
      
      The BlueSky ones may still be lighter, and swivel both ways and only require
       one mounting hole though. So it=99s at least a more expensive but not
       over the top option.
      Tim
      
      
      > On May 25, 2018, at 11:18 PM, Lenard Iszak <lenard@rapiddecision.com> wrot
      e:
      > 
      > It does show on the web:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=480401
      > 
      > 
      > Lenny
      > 
      > 
      >> On May 25, 2018, at 11:54 PM, Bob Turner <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu> wrote:
      >> 
      >> 
      >> Help! I see the photo. Posted on TinyPics. Any ideas?
      >> 
      >> --------
      >> Bob Turner
      >> RV-10 QB
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> Read this topic online here:
      >> 
      >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=480408#480408
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      >> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listhttp://forum======
      ==========================
      ====================;     - NEW MATR
      ONICS LIST WIKI -
      >> _nbsp; --> http://wiki.matronic==============
      ============             - Lnbsp;                   
         -Matt Dralle, Ltronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contrib
      ution
      >> 
      >> 
      >> 
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Thanks Tim. Main point I wanted to make was that the $8 each (I looked up the price)
      tinted plexi from ACS is actually a good product to start from. I cant detect
      any optical distortion in it. But the original suction cup mounting wont
      hold inverted. I keep extra ones in the seat pocket with their suction cups still
      attached, for myself and passengers to use on the side windows.
      How do I make photos more easily visible?
      
      --------
      Bob Turner
      RV-10 QB
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=480419#480419
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | First Conditional | 
      
      My first year has flown by :) I am starting my conditional this week.
      
      I found this RV conditional check list online that looks pretty thorough, I
      thought I would share:
      
         -
         https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B31MKmXjYxYqeWZhcHRlakZzNlE/view?usp=sharing
      
      
      My main question for the group is in regards to logs.  What is the wording
      that I should use for the log entries when complete?  Specifically, for the
      Engine, Propeller and Aircraft logs.
      
      Is it similar to an annual?  For example:  "I certify this XXX has been
      inspected in accordance with a conditional inspection, and was determined
      to be in an airworthy condition."
      
      Thanks!
      
      -- 
      Vernon Franklin
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: First Conditional | 
      
      
      I think you will find suggested wording in your operating limitations document.
      These days the faa recommends you do not use the word airworthy, as that specifically
      means Is in conformance with its type certificate. Of course EAB aircraft
      dont have a type certificate.
      
      --------
      Bob Turner
      RV-10 QB
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=480425#480425
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: First Conditional | 
      
      
      Also, while most people keep separate logbooks for engine, airframe, and prop,
      there is no legal requirement to do so. One conditional inspection sign off (usually
      in the airframe book) is all that is needed.
      
      --------
      Bob Turner
      RV-10 QB
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=480426#480426
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: First Condition | 
      
      1. It is a condition inspection, not conditional.
      2. Your operating limitations will tell you exactly what to do and what
      language to use on the sign off.
      3. You can use whatever checklist pleases you as long as it contains at
      least the scope and detail of 14 CFR 43 Appendix D.
      4. Your sign off will contain the these or similar words " I find this
      aircraft to be in a *condition* for safe operation." That is why it is a
      condition inspection.
      I ass-ume you have obtained from your local FSDO a repairman's certificate
      for your aircraft that permits you to sign off this inspection.
      You must maintain "records" of maintenance and inspections. Whether those
      take the form of logbook(s) or a three ring binder or a file folder does
      not matter.
      As Bob mentioned, there is no such thing as "airworthy" for an aircraft
      that does not have an approved type certificate and type certificate data
      sheet. Only aircraft that have a Standard Airworthiness Certificate on a
      white piece of paper will meet that requirement. The fact that you have a
      Special Airworthiness Certificate in the Experimental category with
      operating limitations is your clue that it will never be "airworthy".
      
      Kelly
      A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor
      
      Sent from my IBM-360 main frame
      
      
      On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Vernon Franklin <vernon.franklin@gmail.com>
      wrote:
      
      > My first year has flown by :) I am starting my conditional this week.
      >
      > I found this RV conditional check list online that looks pretty thorough,
      > I thought I would share:
      >
      >    - https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B31MKmXjYxYqeWZhcHRlakZzNlE
      >    /view?usp=sharing
      >
      >
      > My main question for the group is in regards to logs.  What is the wording
      > that I should use for the log entries when complete?  Specifically, for the
      > Engine, Propeller and Aircraft logs.
      >
      > Is it similar to an annual?  For example:  "I certify this XXX has been
      > inspected in accordance with a conditional inspection, and was determined
      > to be in an airworthy condition."
      >
      > Thanks!
      >
      > --
      > Vernon Franklin
      >
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |