Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 07:15 PM - Section 38 Page 38-8 (Kelly McMullen)
2. 07:50 PM - Re: Section 38 Page 38-8 (Dan Charrois)
3. 08:07 PM - Re: Section 38 Page 38-8 (Tim Olson)
4. 08:33 PM - Re: Section 38 Page 38-8 (Kelly McMullen)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Section 38 Page 38-8 |
With regard to Step 4, and Figure 1.
It appears that the cable exiting the left side of the fuselage is
supposed to cross over the cable exiting the right side of the fuselage.
It seems to me that this could use more clarity. It also seems like it
would have been prudent to have a guide to prevent the cables from ever
rubbing in that area. I suspect there are some flying examples that have
this wrong. I welcome your comments.
Kelly
80466, flying for almost 3 years
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Section 38 Page 38-8 |
Though the diagram appears to have the cables rubbing against each other, in 3
dimensions they don't come close enough to one another to worry about them chafing.
It's one of those situations where the "real world" example makes more
sense than the diagram.
There wouldn't be flying examples of anyone getting this wrong, since if you didn't
have the crossover of cables, the rudder would operate backwards.
Dan
> On 2019-Feb-14, at 8:12 PM, Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> wrote:
>
>
> With regard to Step 4, and Figure 1.
> It appears that the cable exiting the left side of the fuselage is supposed to
cross over the cable exiting the right side of the fuselage.
> It seems to me that this could use more clarity. It also seems like it would
have been prudent to have a guide to prevent the cables from ever rubbing in that
area. I suspect there are some flying examples that have this wrong. I welcome
your comments.
> Kelly
> 80466, flying for almost 3 years
>
>
>
---
Dan Charrois
President, Syzygy Research & Technology
Phone: 780-961-2213
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Section 38 Page 38-8 |
Well, they may have been "flown" examples for one flight.
After that they would probably be salvage examples. ;)
I agree. If someone follows the plans, they seem to be
just fine. I'd worry more about wearing through the
snap bushings, especially in places where the cable is
always rubbing in the same spot. That's something
to check ever condition inspection.
Tim
On 2/14/2019 9:47 PM, Dan Charrois wrote:
>
> There wouldn't be flying examples of anyone getting this wrong, since if you
didn't have the crossover of cables, the rudder would operate backwards.
>
> Dan
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Section 38 Page 38-8 |
I have seen an example of where the cable cross-over existed, but was
"wrong" as the wrong cable on top, so that the cables in fact did rub.
I wasn't suggesting one might not crossover the cables, that is clearly
shown on the plans. What is not so clear is which one needs to be on
top. Until tension is applies it is not so obvious.
Kelly
On 2/14/2019 8:47 PM, Dan Charrois wrote:
>
> Though the diagram appears to have the cables rubbing against each other, in
3 dimensions they don't come close enough to one another to worry about them chafing.
It's one of those situations where the "real world" example makes more
sense than the diagram.
>
> There wouldn't be flying examples of anyone getting this wrong, since if you
didn't have the crossover of cables, the rudder would operate backwards.
>
> Dan
>
>> On 2019-Feb-14, at 8:12 PM, Kelly McMullen <kellym@aviating.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> With regard to Step 4, and Figure 1.
>> It appears that the cable exiting the left side of the fuselage is supposed
to cross over the cable exiting the right side of the fuselage.
>> It seems to me that this could use more clarity. It also seems like it would
have been prudent to have a guide to prevent the cables from ever rubbing in
that area. I suspect there are some flying examples that have this wrong. I welcome
your comments.
>> Kelly
>> 80466, flying for almost 3 years
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---
> Dan Charrois
> President, Syzygy Research & Technology
> Phone: 780-961-2213
>
>
>
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|