---------------------------------------------------------- RV10-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Thu 02/14/19: 4 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 07:15 PM - Section 38 Page 38-8 (Kelly McMullen) 2. 07:50 PM - Re: Section 38 Page 38-8 (Dan Charrois) 3. 08:07 PM - Re: Section 38 Page 38-8 (Tim Olson) 4. 08:33 PM - Re: Section 38 Page 38-8 (Kelly McMullen) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 07:15:41 PM PST US From: Kelly McMullen Subject: RV10-List: Section 38 Page 38-8 With regard to Step 4, and Figure 1. It appears that the cable exiting the left side of the fuselage is supposed to cross over the cable exiting the right side of the fuselage. It seems to me that this could use more clarity. It also seems like it would have been prudent to have a guide to prevent the cables from ever rubbing in that area. I suspect there are some flying examples that have this wrong. I welcome your comments. Kelly 80466, flying for almost 3 years ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 07:50:17 PM PST US From: Dan Charrois Subject: Re: RV10-List: Section 38 Page 38-8 Though the diagram appears to have the cables rubbing against each other, in 3 dimensions they don't come close enough to one another to worry about them chafing. It's one of those situations where the "real world" example makes more sense than the diagram. There wouldn't be flying examples of anyone getting this wrong, since if you didn't have the crossover of cables, the rudder would operate backwards. Dan > On 2019-Feb-14, at 8:12 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > > With regard to Step 4, and Figure 1. > It appears that the cable exiting the left side of the fuselage is supposed to cross over the cable exiting the right side of the fuselage. > It seems to me that this could use more clarity. It also seems like it would have been prudent to have a guide to prevent the cables from ever rubbing in that area. I suspect there are some flying examples that have this wrong. I welcome your comments. > Kelly > 80466, flying for almost 3 years > > > --- Dan Charrois President, Syzygy Research & Technology Phone: 780-961-2213 ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Time: 08:07:16 PM PST US Subject: Re: RV10-List: Section 38 Page 38-8 From: Tim Olson Well, they may have been "flown" examples for one flight. After that they would probably be salvage examples. ;) I agree. If someone follows the plans, they seem to be just fine. I'd worry more about wearing through the snap bushings, especially in places where the cable is always rubbing in the same spot. That's something to check ever condition inspection. Tim On 2/14/2019 9:47 PM, Dan Charrois wrote: > > There wouldn't be flying examples of anyone getting this wrong, since if you didn't have the crossover of cables, the rudder would operate backwards. > > Dan > ________________________________ Message 4 _____________________________________ Time: 08:33:12 PM PST US Subject: Re: RV10-List: Section 38 Page 38-8 From: Kelly McMullen I have seen an example of where the cable cross-over existed, but was "wrong" as the wrong cable on top, so that the cables in fact did rub. I wasn't suggesting one might not crossover the cables, that is clearly shown on the plans. What is not so clear is which one needs to be on top. Until tension is applies it is not so obvious. Kelly On 2/14/2019 8:47 PM, Dan Charrois wrote: > > Though the diagram appears to have the cables rubbing against each other, in 3 dimensions they don't come close enough to one another to worry about them chafing. It's one of those situations where the "real world" example makes more sense than the diagram. > > There wouldn't be flying examples of anyone getting this wrong, since if you didn't have the crossover of cables, the rudder would operate backwards. > > Dan > >> On 2019-Feb-14, at 8:12 PM, Kelly McMullen wrote: >> >> >> With regard to Step 4, and Figure 1. >> It appears that the cable exiting the left side of the fuselage is supposed to cross over the cable exiting the right side of the fuselage. >> It seems to me that this could use more clarity. It also seems like it would have been prudent to have a guide to prevent the cables from ever rubbing in that area. I suspect there are some flying examples that have this wrong. I welcome your comments. >> Kelly >> 80466, flying for almost 3 years >> >> >> > > > > --- > Dan Charrois > President, Syzygy Research & Technology > Phone: 780-961-2213 > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Matronics Email List Services ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post A New Message rv10-list@matronics.com UN/SUBSCRIBE http://www.matronics.com/subscription List FAQ http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm Web Forum Interface To Lists http://forums.matronics.com Matronics List Wiki http://wiki.matronics.com Full Archive Search Engine http://www.matronics.com/search 7-Day List Browse http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list Browse Digests http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list Browse Other Lists http://www.matronics.com/browse Live Online Chat! http://www.matronics.com/chat Archive Downloading http://www.matronics.com/archives Photo Share http://www.matronics.com/photoshare Other Email Lists http://www.matronics.com/emaillists Contributions http://www.matronics.com/contribution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.