Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:57 PM - Re: starters (Robert Jones)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I agree with you. Hartzell just wants to milk every dollar out of the Skytec
brand that they can before they destroy it. I hope B&C is never sold.
Robert Jones
> On Oct 19, 2020, at 8:40 PM, Kelly McMullen <apilot2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> =EF=BB
> When Skytec was its own company, they did overhauls themselves, with good s
ervice. Never had a problem with a starter they rebuilt.
> I guess Hartzell doesn't want to be in the rebuild business. It would seem
any electric shop could reverse engineer it and apply for a PMA approval.
> It isn't like there is any exotic technology. Incredible how Hartzell rais
ed the prices by about $150 for Skytec units, and $300 for the Kelly Electri
c design starters.
> Sent from my TRS-80 Model 100
>
>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:00 PM Robert Jones <rjones560xl@gmail.com> wrot
e:
>> I seem to remember that there was a problem getting Sky-tec starters and a
lternators rebuilt. I chose the B&C starter and alternators because I know t
hat they will always rebuild whatever they have built.
>>
>> Robert Jones
>>
>>>> On Oct 19, 2020, at 5:30 PM, dlm <dlm34077@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>> =EF=BB
>>> anyone using the Vans starter (Sky-tec 149-12XLT) on your 540? The vendo
rs seem to tout the XLT version over the LS version which came with my 540?
>>>
>>> Virus-free. www.avast.com
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|