RV10-List Digest Archive

Wed 10/05/22


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:50 PM - Re: Chelton Flight Systems (Bob Turner)
     2. 03:12 PM - Re: Re: Chelton Flight Systems (Robert Jones)
     3. 04:43 PM - Re: Re: Chelton Flight Systems (Dan Masys)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:50:00 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Chelton Flight Systems
    From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu>
    My two cents: consider what Robert posted, above, but dont go completely crazy over it. In my case, I went with a small company, GRT, because I liked their equipment, especially that it could withstand loss of gps AND airspeed and still compute a horizon, plus the whole package was noticeably less than the competition. Here I am, a dozen years later, and GRT is still there. But if they had gone out of business 6 years ago, nothing would be different, because I havent needed any service, software upgrades, etc. Im happy with what I have. Also note that all avionics companies are prone to problems stemming from part availability. Garmin no longer supports the SL30, despite the fact that, IMHO, it remains the finest nav-com ever built (maybe the new Trig, which emmulates the SL30, will prove to be its equal). The issue is that a key integrated circuit was mass produced for a very large customer (likely a TV manufacturer). But now that TV is out of production, the avionics market is too small, so that chip is out of production. As the stockpile dwindles to zero, the SL30 cannot be economically repaired if that chip fails. The same is true of my GRT EFIS screen. Its no longer in production, so if it fails Im out of luck, regardless of whether or not GRT is still around. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=508026#508026


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:12:18 PM PST US
    From: Robert Jones <rjones560xl@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Chelton Flight Systems
    I have flown an RV7 with GRT installed in it from LAS to OSH and back for Airventure in 2016. That experience was one reason I did not consider GRT for my RV10. My wife (another professional pilot) told me We are not putting GRT in our aircraft. I also worked on the avionics on two other aircraft with GRT and and I was not very impressed on how easy it was to get everything working. As one of those aircraft owners remarked to me The manuals are terrible. I could not disagree with that. I installed 3 Dynon HDX screens along with all the optional components Dynon offered and a Garmin GTN650. My wife loves the panel and so do I. I will agree that a GRT panel will be cheaper, but will depress the resale value of the aircraft. Robert Jones > On Oct 5, 2022, at 12:53 PM, Bob Turner <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu> wrote: > > > My two cents: consider what Robert posted, above, but dont go completely crazy over it. In my case, I went with a small company, GRT, because I liked their equipment, especially that it could withstand loss of gps AND airspeed and still compute a horizon, plus the whole package was noticeably less than the competition. Here I am, a dozen years later, and GRT is still there. But if they had gone out of business 6 years ago, nothing would be different, because I havent needed any service, software upgrades, etc. Im happy with what I have. > Also note that all avionics companies are prone to problems stemming from part availability. Garmin no longer supports the SL30, despite the fact that, IMHO, it remains the finest nav-com ever built (maybe the new Trig, which emmulates the SL30, will prove to be its equal). The issue is that a key integrated circuit was mass produced for a very large customer (likely a TV manufacturer). But now that TV is out of production, the avionics market is too small, so that chip is out of production. As the stockpile dwindles to zero, the SL30 cannot be economically repaired if that chip fails. The same is true of my GRT EFIS screen. Its no longer in production, so if it fails Im out of luck, regardless of whether or not GRT is still around. > > -------- > Bob Turner > RV-10 QB > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=508026#508026 > > > > > > > > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:43:51 PM PST US
    From: Dan Masys <dmasys2@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Chelton Flight Systems
    Sounds like a builder failure more than a GRT failure. Back in 2007 when my wife and I completed our RV-10, GRT was the only game in town that could integrate a Garmin GNS480 with a TruTrak autopilot and fly a fully coupled ILS or RNAV/GPS approach. No Dynon options, no Garmin options. We flew with a two EFIS GRT setup for the first 13 years in a lot of scuzzy weather in the Pacific Northwest, then as a pandemic project upgraded the original displays (called WS by GRT) to Horizon EX's (same holes and same plugs as original units) with synthetic vision, ADS-B traffic and wx. Bright, crisp, very nice displays. Still cruising and shooting ILS and LPV approaches to minimums with that same set of multivendor boxes. We lived closed to Arlington WA and often spoke with Dynon reps who adamantly and repeatedly said their systems were not intended for IFR flight in those days. I did put a Dynon D180 and D100 in my RV-12, and it worked fine, and a Dynon Skyview in another RV-12 for a friend. Compared to GRT, Dynon was very tight lipped about providing schematics and pinouts for integration with other vendors (particularly Brand G). So, pay your money and take your chances on whether your vendor plays nice with others or is even in business a decade after you buy. Tailwinds, -Dan Masys RV-10 N104LD 1275 hrs TTSN On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 3:15 PM Robert Jones <rjones560xl@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have flown an RV7 with GRT installed in it from LAS to OSH and back for > Airventure in 2016. That experience was one reason I did not consider GRT > for my RV10. My wife (another professional pilot) told me =9CWe are not > putting GRT in our aircraft=9D. I also worked on the avionics on t wo other > aircraft with GRT and and I was not very impressed on how easy it was to > get everything working. As one of those aircraft owners remarked to me =9CThe > manuals are terrible.=9D I could not disagree with that. > I installed 3 Dynon HDX screens along with all the optional components > Dynon offered and a Garmin GTN650. My wife loves the panel and so do I. I > will agree that a GRT panel will be cheaper, but will depress the resale > value of the aircraft. > > Robert Jones > > > On Oct 5, 2022, at 12:53 PM, Bob Turner <bobturner@alum.rpi.edu> wrote: > > rpi.edu> > > > > My two cents: consider what Robert posted, above, but don=99t go > completely crazy over it. In my case, I went with a small company, GRT, > because I liked their equipment, especially that it could withstand loss of > gps AND airspeed and still compute a horizon, plus the whole package was > noticeably less than the competition. Here I am, a dozen years later, and > GRT is still there. But if they had gone out of business 6 years ago, > nothing would be different, because I haven=99t needed any service, software > upgrades, etc. I=99m happy with what I have. > > Also note that all avionics companies are prone to problems stemming > from part availability. Garmin no longer supports the SL30, despite the > fact that, IMHO, it remains the finest nav-com ever built (maybe the new > Trig, which emmulates the SL30, will prove to be its equal). The issue is > that a key integrated circuit was mass produced for a very large customer > (likely a TV manufacturer). But now that TV is out of production, the > avionics market is too small, so that chip is out of production. As the > stockpile dwindles to zero, the SL30 cannot be economically repaired if > that chip fails. The same is true of my GRT EFIS screen. It=99s no longer in > production, so if it fails I=99m out of luck, regardless of whether or not > GRT is still around. > > > > -------- > > Bob Turner > > RV-10 QB > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=508026#508026 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --