Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 02:00 PM - Re: Re: RV4-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 01/24/06 (Steve Sampson)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RV4-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 01/24/06 |
--> RV4-List message posted by: "Steve Sampson" <SSampson.SLN21@london.edu>
Rob - I am totally unfamiliar with the set up you have.Never heard of K&N
but I have never understood why we need to filter the air once airborne.
My plan was to go with the Silver Hawk injector, mostly because that is what
everyone offered if FI. Reason for going FI was here in the UK carb ice is
frequent and I presume the injected engine is smoother and more frugal on
fuel. However the things stacking up the other way are:
- I really prefer the look of the O-320 cowl
- the air inlet is presumably matched to the engine
- VANS can supply the brackets for the carb but not FI and the O-320 FAB
will fit
- there are not so many aircraft to copy how things are done near me. I have
built a carb -9A before and feel more confident.
- there was also an interesting old post at Vans Airforce "Carb vs Fuel
Injection" by Stein Bruch which go me thinking that perhaps the money is
better in my pocket.
Feel free to tell me I am making a mistake if you feel strongly.
If I go back to a carb I guess I have to understand if I want a Marvel or
someting else. Is there any other carb I should consider? If so what does it
offer?
Cheers, Steve.
----- Original Message -----
From: "rob ray" <smokyray@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 1:38 PM
Subject: RV4-List: Re: RV4-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 01/24/06
> --> RV4-List message posted by: rob ray <smokyray@yahoo.com>
>
> Steve, I didn't use the FAB on my RV4 as I built my own tunnel ram
> equipped with Ram air for normal flight and a K&N filter by-pass for
> ground operations. Hasn't let me down in 10 years. This allowed me to run
> the early stock cowl and scoop with a carb. My cowl was from pre-FAB days
> when the plans called for a setup similar to mine. In 95' the FAB came out
> and they enlarged the scoop to handle it, although the carb intake
> location isn't the same on all 320 sumps and the FAB won't work on every
> engine without some serious cutting. Van's sells the larger scoop you can
> attach to the cowl, I bought one and it is still sitting in my attic,
> never used. Which injector throttle body are you going with?
>
> I too like the looks of the 320 cowl and scoop and haven't changed it
> one bit...
>
> RR
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|