Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:50 PM - 2-10 Switch (David Oakes)
     2. 09:16 PM - Re: Dynon Skyview Airspeed Calibration...  (Matt Dralle)
     3. 09:50 PM - Re: 2-10 Switch (Matt Dralle)
     4. 10:33 PM - Dynon Skyview vs. GRT HX EFIS... (Matt Dralle)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I need to understand how this type of switch works. My goal is to turn on two landing
      lights and then turn off one to use as a taxi light.
      
      Thanks for help in advance.
      Dave
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Dynon Skyview Airspeed Calibration...  | 
      
      At 07:39 PM 12/26/2011 Monday, Matt Dralle wrote:
      >Dear Listers,
      >
      >I've been flying the new 10" Dynon Skyview in the RV-6 for a few weeks now and
      it seems like the airspeed is reading maybe 10mph fast.  The GS always reads
      10mph or more slower than the True airspeed, no matter which way I fly with respect
      to the current wind.  Looking through the configuration options on the Skyview,
      I'm not seeing parameters to calibrate the airspeed.  If the airspeed
      were *slow* compared to the GS, I could envision making adjustments to the Pitot
      tube to get it in better alignment with slipstream.  But *fast* is a head scratcher.
      If there's no electronic configuration parameters to adjust, what do
      you do?  Are there Pitot line "attenuators" like for RF in coax? ;-)
      >
      >Matt
      
      Listers,
      
      Thank you for all the great suggestions on resolving this airspeed issue!  I took
      a look at the static ports on the RV-6 today and found that they are done using
      a flush head screw with a hole drilled in the center on either side of the
      fuselage.  They do *not* protrude from the side of the plane at all.  They are
      totally flush (see attached picture).  Just for fun, I whipped up a couple
      of quick test deals using a 3/16" washer and some electrical tape.  I poked a
      1/16" hole in the center of the tape and then put the washer centered over the
      static ports on both sides of the fuselage (see attached pictures).  Then, I
      went flying on this beautiful December 27 day in California!
      
      I didn't have time to do any real scientific multi-leg testing, but I was amazed
      that the True Airspeed is now falling in a much more believable range compared
      to the GPS-derived ground speed.  On one cross-country leg, I had an exactly
      90 degree crosswind component and the True Airspeed and GPS Ground Speed were
      tracking exactly the same.  Yahoo!
      
      Obviously I need to do some additional, more scientific measurements and probably
      come up with a slightly more "permanent" washer arrangement, but the early
      returns are very promising! :-)
      
      Thanks again for all the great feedback!
      
      Matt
      
      
      -
      Matt "Red Dawg" Dralle
      
      RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen"
      http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log
      http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log
      http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel
      Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap...
      
      RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer"
      http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log
      Status: 42+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      At 07:47 PM 12/27/2011  Tuesday, you wrote:
      >
      >I need to understand how this type of switch works. My goal is to turn on two
      landing lights and then turn off one to use as a taxi light.
      >
      >Thanks for help in advance.
      >Dave
      
      Hi Dave,
      
      Are you saying that you want to flip the switch UP and have both the Landing light
      and the Taxi light ON, and then flip the switch DOWN and just have the Taxi
      light ON and the Landing light OFF?  In the Center position both Landing and
      Taxi lights would be OFF?
      
      Matt
      
      -
      Matt "Red Dawg" Dralle
      
      RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen"
      http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log
      http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log
      http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel
      Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap...
      
      RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer"
      http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log
      Status: 42+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Dynon Skyview vs. GRT HX EFIS... | 
      
      
      
      >At 09:47 PM 12/27/2011  Tuesday, you wrote:
      >I have looked at the Dynon stuff up at Arlington Air Show the past two years
      >and really like the looks of them. They added autopilot and said last year
      >that they were about to announce communications added to their system.  A
      >single 10" screen to do everything would be pretty easy to install learn to
      >operate.  Mostly Dynon looks best in the magazines. I guess you get used to
      >any of them or they would not all still be in business.
      >Pete
      
      
      I have a Dynon 10" Skyview in the RV-6:
      
      http://www.mattsrv6.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV6&project 43&category=0&log=138164&row=45
      http://www.mattsrv6.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV6&project 43&category=0&log=138163&row=46
      
      and a triple GRT HX setup in the RV-8:
      
      http://www.mattsrv8.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV8&project=638&category=2973&log'376&row=134
      http://www.mattsrv8.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV8&project=638&category=2973&log'375&row=135
      
      I've flown the GRT HX setup about 170 hours and the Dynon Skyview system about
      45 hours now.
      
      Which do I prefer?  That's a tough call.  There are parts about each system that
      I like a lot...
      
      The installation and configuration of the Dynon is easier.  Instructions are also
      better.  The network cable interconnect system that Dynon uses (I think it
      is just RS485, but it works well) is also a no-brainer to install.  Their display
      (PFD/Engine/Map) are definitely very pretty and demo well.
      
      The GRT is a little harder to get installed, the manual is a little sketchy in
      places and there are a LOT of configuration options that can seem daunting at
      first.  BUT, there is power and utility in those options.  If you use them to
      your advantage, you can probably do more, better on the GRT compared to the Dynon.
      The displays on the GRT don't have the "3D-y", "Windows-y" look to them.
      BUT, I think I'm preferring that at this point.  Doing a scan on the GRT looking
      for something out of the ordinary is quicker and more accurate.  I also like
      the PFD layout and operation on the GRT better.  It feels more "accurate"
      and "believable" to me for some reason.  I never quite "trust" what I'm seeing
      on the Dynon for some reason and I don't know why.  Maybe I just need more time
      on the Dynon. 
      
      So, the Dynon has it for Installation and Configuation, but the GRT has it for
      Operation and Presentation as far as I'm concerned.  If I was building a new plane,
      I think that I would probably go with the GRT.  But its a close race.  I
      really like the Dynon system too.
      
      I guess I'm saying if you're in the market for a full-featured EFIS system, give
      GRT and Dynon both very close look before you make your selection.  In my opinion,
      it comes down to personal preferences in a few select areas on which way
      to go.  Both systems are top notch.
      
      BTW, Dynon's autopilot add-on for the Skyview which I have in the RV-6 works well.
      Its a good autopilot that does the job.  The servos are the same as with
      the TruTrak system.  In the RV-8, I have the TruTrak Digiflight II VSGV system.
      The TruTrak is a smoother, more accurate autopilot in my opinion, and I would
      go that route again.  But, it also costs quite a bit more than just adding
      servos to the Dynon or GRT.
      
      $.02
      
      -
      Matt "Red Dawg" Dralle
      
      RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen"
      http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log
      http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log
      http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel
      Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap...
      
      RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer"
      http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log
      Status: 42+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |