Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:04 AM - Re: RV-List: Dynon Skyview Airspeed Calibration... (Carl Froehlich)
2. 09:16 PM - Re: Dynon Skyview Airspeed Calibration... (Matt Dralle)
3. 10:33 PM - Dynon Skyview vs. GRT HX EFIS... (Matt Dralle)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | RE: RV-List: Dynon Skyview Airspeed Calibration... |
A few of thoughts.
1. It is an easy set up to verify IAS reads properly. Attached photos are
the rig I used. I also attached the scale to translate inches to knots.
There are various placed to find the test rig on the web. You need not take
the airspeed indicator out of the plane, just attached the tube to the pitot
and seal with electrical tape. In the attached rig photo, the pressure
source attaches to the tube that is hanging free on the left. I found an
old blood pressure bulb for this.
2. For my 8A, I initially used a pitot tube that included the static port.
It word well except for high pitch angles. At high angles the static port
started to get ram air. The result was I could have "0" IAS in power on
stalls but still be flying.
3. When I took the plane down for paint, I installed two of the Cleveland
tool static ports in the standard fuselage locations. These are flush
ports. I found this induced a static error. I did a simple fix by drilling
a 1/16 inch hole in the center of a 3/16 round head rivet, cut the rivet
head off and then epoxied the rivet head over the static port. I used a
toothpick to hold the rivet head in place while the epoxy set, and to keep
the epoxy out the hole. This fix solved the static problem. Photo
attached.
4. On the RV-10, I used the same rivet but did not use the Cleveland ports.
I drilled the 1/16" hole all the way thought the head and rivet shank. I
epoxied the rivet to the fuselage, adding a 1/8" thick, 1/2" diameter
aluminum ring (3/16 hole drilled in the middle) backer to the inside of the
fuselage to add strength. The static line then gets epoxied over the rivet
shank.
Once you verify the IAS is correct, but you still have a problem with TAS
reading high, recommend you talk a look at where you mounted the Dynon OAT
probe. If you have it in a place that is typically hotter than outside or
getting a lot of prop wash (increases temperature), TAS will read high.
Carl
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-rv-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Linn Walters
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: RV-List: Dynon Skyview Airspeed Calibration...
--> RV-List message posted by: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot@bellsouth.net>
I think you're on the right track ..... airspeed is the measurement of
the difference in pressure between the pitot and static. So, it appears
(to me anyway) that the static pressure is in a lower pressure area than
it 'should be'. You should have two static ports, one on each side of
the fuselage about 1/2 way between wing trailing edge and horizontal
stab leading edge. This should be the area of least disturbed air going
by. Having the ports on each side balances the pressures caused by
slipping and sliding. The port should stick out a little to get out of
the laminar air flow along the fuselage.
Since there's no airflow in either the pitot or static lines, a
restricter won't have any effect. The angle of the pitot to relative
airflow will have some effect on the airspeed reading too.
One of our RV-4 pilots (he bought it, not built it) was complaining
about inaccurate airspeed and we found the single static port above and
forward of the wing leading edge on the left fuselage side. It's a
'washer' about 1" dia and 1/16" thick with a small hole in the center.
It's located right where prop wash will really hit it with turbulent
air. He plans on moving it and installing two ports as above.
Linn
On 12/26/2011 10:39 PM, Matt Dralle wrote:
> --> RV-List message posted by: Matt Dralle<dralle@matronics.com>
>
> Dear Listers,
>
> I've been flying the new 10" Dynon Skyview in the RV-6 for a few weeks now
and it seems like the airspeed is reading maybe 10mph fast. The GS always
reads 10mph or more slower than the True airspeed, no matter which way I fly
with respect to the current wind. Looking through the configuration options
on the Skyview, I'm not seeing parameters to calibrate the airspeed. If the
airspeed were *slow* compared to the GS, I could envision making adjustments
to the Pitot tube to get it in better alignment with slipstream. But *fast*
is a head scratcher. If there's no electronic configuration parameters to
adjust, what do you do? Are there Pitot line "attenuators" like for RF in
coax? ;-)
>
> Matt
>
> -
> Matt "Red Dawg" Dralle
>
> RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen"
> http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log
> http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log
> http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel
> Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap...
>
> RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer"
> http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log
> Status: 42+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer
Mode
>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Dynon Skyview Airspeed Calibration... |
At 07:40 PM 12/26/2011 Monday, Matt Dralle wrote:
>Dear Listers,
>
>I've been flying the new 10" Dynon Skyview in the RV-6 for a few weeks now and
it seems like the airspeed is reading maybe 10mph fast. The GS always reads
10mph or more slower than the True airspeed, no matter which way I fly with respect
to the current wind. Looking through the configuration options on the Skyview,
I'm not seeing parameters to calibrate the airspeed. If the airspeed
were *slow* compared to the GS, I could envision making adjustments to the Pitot
tube to get it in better alignment with slipstream. But *fast* is a head scratcher.
If there's no electronic configuration parameters to adjust, what do
you do? Are there Pitot line "attenuators" like for RF in coax? ;-)
>
>Matt
Listers,
Thank you for all the great suggestions on resolving this airspeed issue! I took
a look at the static ports on the RV-6 today and found that they are done using
a flush head screw with a hole drilled in the center on either side of the
fuselage. They do *not* protrude from the side of the plane at all. They are
totally flush (see attached picture). Just for fun, I whipped up a couple
of quick test deals using a 3/16" washer and some electrical tape. I poked a
1/16" hole in the center of the tape and then put the washer centered over the
static ports on both sides of the fuselage (see attached pictures). Then, I
went flying on this beautiful December 27 day in California!
I didn't have time to do any real scientific multi-leg testing, but I was amazed
that the True Airspeed is now falling in a much more believable range compared
to the GPS-derived ground speed. On one cross-country leg, I had an exactly
90 degree crosswind component and the True Airspeed and GPS Ground Speed were
tracking exactly the same. Yahoo!
Obviously I need to do some additional, more scientific measurements and probably
come up with a slightly more "permanent" washer arrangement, but the early
returns are very promising! :-)
Thanks again for all the great feedback!
Matt
-
Matt "Red Dawg" Dralle
RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen"
http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log
http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log
http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel
Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap...
RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer"
http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log
Status: 42+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Dynon Skyview vs. GRT HX EFIS... |
>At 09:47 PM 12/27/2011 Tuesday, you wrote:
>I have looked at the Dynon stuff up at Arlington Air Show the past two years
>and really like the looks of them. They added autopilot and said last year
>that they were about to announce communications added to their system. A
>single 10" screen to do everything would be pretty easy to install learn to
>operate. Mostly Dynon looks best in the magazines. I guess you get used to
>any of them or they would not all still be in business.
>Pete
I have a Dynon 10" Skyview in the RV-6:
http://www.mattsrv6.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV6&project 43&category=0&log=138164&row=45
http://www.mattsrv6.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV6&project 43&category=0&log=138163&row=46
and a triple GRT HX setup in the RV-8:
http://www.mattsrv8.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV8&project=638&category=2973&log'376&row=134
http://www.mattsrv8.com/users/display_log.php?user=MattsRV8&project=638&category=2973&log'375&row=135
I've flown the GRT HX setup about 170 hours and the Dynon Skyview system about
45 hours now.
Which do I prefer? That's a tough call. There are parts about each system that
I like a lot...
The installation and configuration of the Dynon is easier. Instructions are also
better. The network cable interconnect system that Dynon uses (I think it
is just RS485, but it works well) is also a no-brainer to install. Their display
(PFD/Engine/Map) are definitely very pretty and demo well.
The GRT is a little harder to get installed, the manual is a little sketchy in
places and there are a LOT of configuration options that can seem daunting at
first. BUT, there is power and utility in those options. If you use them to
your advantage, you can probably do more, better on the GRT compared to the Dynon.
The displays on the GRT don't have the "3D-y", "Windows-y" look to them.
BUT, I think I'm preferring that at this point. Doing a scan on the GRT looking
for something out of the ordinary is quicker and more accurate. I also like
the PFD layout and operation on the GRT better. It feels more "accurate"
and "believable" to me for some reason. I never quite "trust" what I'm seeing
on the Dynon for some reason and I don't know why. Maybe I just need more time
on the Dynon.
So, the Dynon has it for Installation and Configuation, but the GRT has it for
Operation and Presentation as far as I'm concerned. If I was building a new plane,
I think that I would probably go with the GRT. But its a close race. I
really like the Dynon system too.
I guess I'm saying if you're in the market for a full-featured EFIS system, give
GRT and Dynon both very close look before you make your selection. In my opinion,
it comes down to personal preferences in a few select areas on which way
to go. Both systems are top notch.
BTW, Dynon's autopilot add-on for the Skyview which I have in the RV-6 works well.
Its a good autopilot that does the job. The servos are the same as with
the TruTrak system. In the RV-8, I have the TruTrak Digiflight II VSGV system.
The TruTrak is a smoother, more accurate autopilot in my opinion, and I would
go that route again. But, it also costs quite a bit more than just adding
servos to the Dynon or GRT.
$.02
-
Matt "Red Dawg" Dralle
RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen"
http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log
http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log
http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel
Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap...
RV-6 #20916 N360EM "The Flyer"
http://www.mattsrv6.com - Matt's RV-6 Revitalization Log
Status: 42+ Hours Since Purchase - Upgrades Complete; Now In Full Flyer Mode
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|