RV9-List Digest Archive

Sat 03/08/03


Total Messages Posted: 9



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:02 AM - Re: V Speeds (Frank)
     2. 12:28 AM - Re: Aeroflash Strobe Unit (Steve Sampson)
     3. 09:20 AM - Re:Aeroflash Strobe Unit (Leland)
     4. 12:04 PM - Re: Re:Aeroflash Strobe Unit (Bob Kelly)
     5. 01:06 PM - [ John Harris ] : New Email List Photo Share Available! (Email List Photo Shares)
     6. 07:20 PM - (no subject) (DLOMHEIM@aol.com)
     7. 07:24 PM - Sorry about my last posting! (DLOMHEIM@aol.com)
     8. 11:45 PM - Gifts from the French (Rob W M Shipley)
     9. 11:46 PM - 705 bulkhead alignment. (Rob W M Shipley)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:02:38 AM PST US
    From: "Frank" <fscorpio@softcom.net>
    Subject: Re: V Speeds
    --> RV9-List message posted by: "Frank" <fscorpio@softcom.net> Ned, Per Gus Funnell at vansaircraft: Vne RV-7/7A is 230 mph Vne RV-A is 210 mph Va RV-7 is 142 mph Va RV-9A is 118 mph Vx RV-7 is 90 mph Vx RV-9A is 80 mph Vy RV-7 is 115 mph Vy RV-9A is 110 mph All are approximate. Frank ----- Original Message ----- From: <315@cox.net> Subject: RV9-List: V Speeds > --> RV9-List message posted by: <315@cox.net> > > Anyone know what the V speeds for the RV9A are? Such as Maximum Structural > Cruising and Never Exceed speeds? > Thanks, > Ned > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:28:17 AM PST US
    From: "Steve Sampson" <SSampson.SLN21@london.edu>
    Subject: Aeroflash Strobe Unit
    --> RV9-List message posted by: "Steve Sampson" <SSampson.SLN21@london.edu> Todd - thanks for that. It's the conclusion I have reluctantly been moving towards. That combined with the absolutely offputting style of the aeroflash customer service have nearly sold me on going with Whelen. They sure hate to answer a question. I just hate to pay so much for that little tail light. Regards, Steve. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of tchoug Subject: RE: RV9-List: Aeroflash Strobe Unit --> RV9-List message posted by: tchoug <tchoug@micron.com> Steve, If you're thinking about using the aeroflash tube with the NOVA X-PAK, you might want to look into the power rating of the aeroflash tube. The aeroflash spec from the link listed earlier indicates that the supply is rated at 10 joules output, it doesn't state what the tube can handle. The X-PAK 904 used to power two wing tip strobes and one tail strobe is rated at about 40 joules for each pair of outputs. With the wingtip strobes working as a pair they divide this for 20 joules each. With the tail strobe being solitary, it gets the full 40 joules! I have the X-PAK 904 and the Whelen strobe tubes. I've hooked them up in the shop and let me tell you, they are bright! However, the tail strobe definitely gets very hot with no airflow. If the aeroflash tail strobe can't handle much more than the 10 joule rating of the supply, you're likely to fry it driving it from an X-PAK. The Whelen supply is rated very similar to the X-PAK so the Whelen tubes should be able to handle the X-PAK supply output. Todd RV9A - Fuselage -----Original Message----- From: Steve Sampson [mailto:SSampson.SLN21@london.edu] Subject: RE: RV9-List: Aeroflash Strobe Unit --> RV9-List message posted by: "Steve Sampson" <SSampson.SLN21@london.edu> Yes I also have a Nova strobe power unit. I am just trying to avoid using the Whelen unit on the tail . I hate monopolies! Regards, Steve. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Leland Subject: Re: RV9-List: Aeroflash Strobe Unit --> RV9-List message posted by: Leland <Federigo@pacbell.net> Steve, generally the Aeroflash system puts out less energy per flash, so a Whelan power supply may overdrive the Aeroflash flashlamps. I bought an X-PAK 904 strobe power supply, which has specifications comparable to Whelan's, is cheaper and has a longer warranty. I have operated it with the Whelan lamps, but only in the garage. Leland in Pleasanton Installing the empenage fairing, which fits like an OJ glove. PS: Buy Van's gascolator bracket (listed in the fireward-forward kit) before drilling holes for mounting the gascolator to the firewall. This bracket is not shown on the fuse drawings


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:20:08 AM PST US
    From: Leland <Federigo@pacbell.net>
    Subject: RE:Aeroflash Strobe Unit
    --> RV9-List message posted by: Leland <Federigo@pacbell.net> Mathew A joule as used here refers to the energy supplied to the flashlamp. A candela or candle is related to watts or joules/second of light actually radiated by the lamp, and this relationship includes the color or wavelength of the light and the "solid angle" over which it is radiated. The "watts radiated" is roughly equal to the "joules radiated" divided by the time over which it is radiated. Bottom line is that the manufacturer will have to measure the radiated candles for a specific light source, amount of supplied joules and pulse width. The regulation that all aircraft must meet is FAR 23.1401. I suspect that the Aeroflash units meet the candle requirement because they are standard equipment on thousands of Cessnas. The Whelan units are probably brighter. Leland in Pleasanton Re-plumbing some of the fuel line "There ya have it. According to the Whelen site "These anti-collision systems must produce a minimum of 400 effective candela in aviation". Can anyone convert joules to candela??"


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:04:28 PM PST US
    From: Bob Kelly <mmpi@missionmedia.org>
    Subject: Re: RE:Aeroflash Strobe Unit
    --> RV9-List message posted by: Bob Kelly <mmpi@missionmedia.org> Leland, My problem with 23.1401 isn't so much the amount of light, because at least comparitively, that can be measured with either a light meter (rotating beacon) or flash meter. With the proper amount of light (and flashes or rotations/min) the intent of the reg would be met. I wonder about the word "approved." Has anyone has ever actually had a system approved made by several manufacturers? I would love to experiment with lighting, specifically LED's, but don't want to waste time and money. Does anyone know what is meant by "approved?" Can a DAR do this? Bob Kelly On 08-Mar-03, Leland wrote: > --> RV9-List message posted by: Leland <Federigo@pacbell.net> > > Mathew > A joule as used here refers to the energy supplied to the flashlamp. A > candela or candle is related to watts or joules/second of light actually > radiated by the lamp, and this relationship includes the color or > wavelength of the light and the "solid angle" over which it is radiated. > The "watts radiated" is roughly equal to the "joules radiated" divided > by the time over which it is radiated. Bottom line is that the > manufacturer will have to measure the radiated candles for a specific > light source, amount of supplied joules and pulse width. > > The regulation that all aircraft must meet is FAR 23.1401. I suspect > that the Aeroflash units meet the candle requirement because they are > standard equipment on thousands of Cessnas. The Whelan units are > probably brighter. > > Leland in Pleasanton > Re-plumbing some of the fuel line > > > "There ya have it. According to the Whelen site "These anti-collision > systems > must produce a minimum of 400 effective candela in aviation". Can > anyone > convert joules to candela??" > > > > > > > Regards


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:06:56 PM PST US
    Subject: [ John Harris ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
    From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures@matronics.com>
    --> RV9-List message posted by: Email List Photo Shares <pictures@matronics.com> A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: John Harris <johnharris@nc.rr.com> Subject: Bracket for Wing Wiring Conduit http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/johnharris@nc.rr.com.03.08.2003/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures@matronics.com


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:20:51 PM PST US
    From: DLOMHEIM@aol.com
    Subject: (no subject)
    --> RV9-List message posted by: DLOMHEIM@aol.com Ned: I have had great luck with the dimple dies from Brown tools right out on Meridian by Will Rodgers. I did get the tank dies from Cleaveland tools and they worked great for the fuel tanks...I sent them to my dad in Denver (building a 7) and the male one finally broke...I hear I can get another one but haven't tried yet. Mitchell stopped by my house today and we talked RV-9s for while...his quick build should be coming in the next few months...good for him. Happy building! Doug Lomheim 793-8647 Twin Lakes Airport "Pilot's Haven" 90116 Flaps


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:24:10 PM PST US
    From: DLOMHEIM@aol.com
    Subject: Sorry about my last posting!
    --> RV9-List message posted by: DLOMHEIM@aol.com Sorry guys...I meant to send my last posting to Ned direct... Doug Lomheim 90116 From: DLOMHEIM@aol.com Subject: (no subject) Ned: I have had great luck with the dimple dies from Brown tools right out on Meridian by Will Rodgers. I did get the tank dies from Cleaveland tools and they worked great for the fuel tanks...I sent them to my dad in Denver (building a 7) and the male one finally broke...I hear I can get another one but haven't tried yet. Mitchell stopped by my house today and we talked RV-9s for while...his quick build should be coming in the next few months...good for him. Happy building! Doug Lomheim 793-8647 Twin Lakes Airport "Pilot's Haven" 90116 Flaps


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:45:57 PM PST US
    From: "Rob W M Shipley" <Rob@RobsGlass.com>
    Subject: Gifts from the French
    --> RV9-List message posted by: "Rob W M Shipley" <Rob@RobsGlass.com> Whilst listing the gifts America has received from our valiant allies, the French remember to add one more. They gave us the ground to bury our dead from the First and Second world wars. They would do well to remember the support they received from the United States of America. Do Not Archive Rob Rob W M Shipley RV9A N919RV Fuselage.


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:46:02 PM PST US
    From: "Rob W M Shipley" <Rob@RobsGlass.com>
    Subject: 705 bulkhead alignment.
    --> RV9-List message posted by: "Rob W M Shipley" <Rob@RobsGlass.com> Do others with their fuselages upside down and mostly assembled have a slight dip (approx 3/16") at the 705 bulkhead if a straight edge is placed across it down the longitudinal axis of the fuselage? I hope this is clear ......... Mine appears to have everything fitting correctly but this slight concavity in the bottom of the fuse at the 705 is quite obvious and I'm wondering why it's there. [The 705 is the rear spar attach / seat belt floor attach / roll bar bulkhead.] Input welcomed. Rob Rob W M Shipley RV9A N919RV Fuselage.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv9-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV9-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv9-list
  • Browse RV9-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv9-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --