RV9-List Digest Archive

Sun 08/24/03


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:09 AM - Re: RV9A Stabilizer (Ken Moak)
     2. 01:43 AM - Re: RV9A Stabilizer (Warren Smith)
     3. 02:15 PM - CHT Probe (Roy Taylor)
     4. 04:38 PM - #40 hole sizes (Rob W M Shipley)
     5. 10:09 PM - Re: CHT Probe (DThomas773@aol.com)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:09:43 AM PST US
    From: Ken Moak <ken_moak@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: RV9A Stabilizer
    --> RV9-List message posted by: Ken Moak <ken_moak@yahoo.com> Depending on who you talk to a 41 or a 40 is right for 3/32 rivet. I have tried both not much difference. Be sure the bit is really the size you think. I bought some cheap bits once from Harbor Freight and they were way off. Cost me about $40 when I drilled a bolt hole too large and had to remake some parts. When in doubt measure it with a good pair of calipers. Vans makes mistakes, but I can tell you I have misread far more than they have written wrong. Found a lot of people on the list willing to help. It is a lot cheaper to ask first. Good Luck Ken Wings 90508 --- Warren Smith <adslf45i@tpg.com.au> wrote: > --> RV9-List message posted by: "Warren Smith" > <adslf45i@tpg.com.au> > > Hi Guys=0D > =0D > Horizontal Stabilizer RV9A=0D > I don't know if any one else has came across this in > the manual for the RV9a > in section 6 /6-2 in paragraph 8 on this page it > says to match drill the > skins to the skeletal structure, enlarging the > prepunched 3/32 inch holes > to #40, this I think is a mistake as the rivets > supplied for this are exact > for the 3/32 hole if they are drilled out to #40 the > rivets will fall > straight through the holes, either I'm missing > something or someone at Van's > have goofed.=0D > =0D > The rivets supplied are: AN426AD3-4.=0D > =0D > As I have not drilled these holes as yet and don't > intend to until this is > clarified.=0D > =0D > Any comment or help in this regard will be most > appreciated.=0D > =0D > Thanks Guys=0D > =0D > Warren Smith=0D > Builder from Sydney, Australia.=0D > adslf45i@tpg.com.au > > > > Contributions > any other > Forums. > > latest messages. > List members. > > http://www.matronics.com/subscription > http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV9-List.htm > http://www.matronics.com/archives > http://www.matronics.com/photoshare > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > > > > __________________________________ http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:43:13 AM PST US
    From: "Warren Smith" <adslf45i@tpg.com.au>
    Subject: Re: RV9A Stabilizer
    --> RV9-List message posted by: "Warren Smith" <adslf45i@tpg.com.au> Hi Ken=0D =0D Thanks for that help this is why I asked first as there are many builders out there with more experience in building then me I'm still learning. The #30 drills are readily available here in Australia but the #40s are only available from a couple of suppliers so I have been informed.=0D =0D Once again thank guys for your invaluable help.=0D =0D Cheers=0D Warren Smith=0D RV9A builder=0D Sydney Australia.=0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: rv9-list@matronics.com=0D Subject: Re: RV9-List: RV9A Stabilizer=0D =0D --> RV9-List message posted by: Ken Moak <ken_moak@yahoo.com>=0D =0D Depending on who you talk to a 41 or a 40 is right for=0D 3/32 rivet. I have tried both not much difference.=0D Be sure the bit is really the size you think. I=0D bought some cheap bits once from Harbor Freight and=0D they were way off. Cost me about $40 when I drilled a=0D bolt hole too large and had to remake some parts.=0D When in doubt measure it with a good pair of calipers.=0D =0D Vans makes mistakes, but I can tell you I have misread=0D far more than they have written wrong. Found a lot of=0D people on the list willing to help. It is a lot=0D cheaper to ask first.=0D =0D Good Luck=0D =0D Ken=0D Wings 90508=0D =0D =0D --- Warren Smith <adslf45i@tpg.com.au> wrote:=0D > --> RV9-List message posted by: "Warren Smith"=0D > <adslf45i@tpg.com.au>=0D >=0D > Hi Guys0D=0D > 0D=0D > Horizontal Stabilizer RV9A0D=0D > I don't know if any one else has came across this in=0D > the manual for the RV9a=0D > in section 6 /6-2 in paragraph 8 on this page it=0D > says to match drill the=0D > skins to the skeletal structure, enlarging the=0D > prepunched 3/32 inch holes=0D > to #40, this I think is a mistake as the rivets=0D > supplied for this are exact=0D > for the 3/32 hole if they are drilled out to #40 the=0D > rivets will fall=0D > straight through the holes, either I'm missing=0D > something or someone at Van's=0D > have goofed.0D=0D > 0D=0D > The rivets supplied are: AN426AD3-4.0D=0D > 0D=0D > As I have not drilled these holes as yet and don't=0D > intend to until this is=0D > clarified.0D=0D > 0D=0D > Any comment or help in this regard will be most=0D > appreciated.0D=0D > 0D=0D > Thanks Guys0D=0D > 0D=0D > Warren Smith0D=0D > Builder from Sydney, Australia.0D=0D > adslf45i@tpg.com.au=0D >=0D >=0D >=0D > Contributions=0D > any other=0D > Forums.=0D >=0D > latest messages.=0D > List members.=0D >=0D > http://www.matronics.com/subscription=0D > http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV9-List.htm=0D > http://www.matronics.com/archives=0D > http://www.matronics.com/photoshare=0D > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists=0D >=0D >=0D >=0D >=0D >=0D =0D =0D __________________________________=0D http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com=0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =2E


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:15:29 PM PST US
    From: "Roy Taylor" <Royandjilly@btinternet.com>
    Subject: CHT Probe
    --> RV9-List message posted by: "Roy Taylor" <Royandjilly@btinternet.com> I expect this has been discussed before....the Lycoming Reprints book that comes with the engine says "..most GA aircraft take the CHT off the hottest cylinder of the four..." (page 50). Those of you flying, if still reading this site, will have a view on which cylinder that's likely to be...assuming you've got 4 CHT's. I'm only fitting one, so which one is it? Roy, G-RUVY. FWF at last.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:38:01 PM PST US
    From: "Rob W M Shipley" <rob@robsglass.com>
    Subject: #40 hole sizes
    --> RV9-List message posted by: "Rob W M Shipley" <rob@robsglass.com> --> RV9-List message posted by: Sargentclt@cs.com Great news You are not alone. As I began building my RV7A which is similar to the RV9 I went through the same doubts as you. Just remember all the holes Van has drilled are one size too small by one size. Example the #40 hole you are to drill is actually a #41. Another reminder for me is the larger the number on the drill bit the small the The prepunched holes are not #41 - they are smaller. I was cautioned by my technical adviser for having holes too loose using the recommended Vans method. Being sceptical of this advice I researched the Mil Spec requirements and indeed he was correct. The recommended practices I found specified holes to be no more than .003 oversize. Unfortunately using a #40 drill and a #40 dimple die gives you holes with far more clearance - .008 to .011 depending on the skin thickness you're dimpling. I switched to using a #41 drill bit for the skins in order to get tighter tolerances - about .005. Does any of this matter? Probably not. As Van's tell you "Build the way we tell you and you'll have a fine plane". It's very hard to argue with Van's track record and bear in mind that you can't buy a #41 dimpler which is probably what is required to meet the .003 tolerances, so every builder has the same holes you will. Good luck and fly safe. Rob Rob W M Shipley RV9A N919RV (res) Fuselage


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:09:50 PM PST US
    From: DThomas773@aol.com
    Subject: Re: CHT Probe
    --> RV9-List message posted by: DThomas773@aol.com Hi Roy, I'm not an engine guy but I think it is the one closest to the firewall. Dennis Thomas




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv9-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV9-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv9-list
  • Browse RV9-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv9-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --