Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:35 AM - Re: RV9A Stabilizer (Pitner, Timothy)
2. 09:34 AM - Re: CHT Probe (Leland)
Message 1
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV9-List message posted by: "Pitner, Timothy" <TPitner@flowcorp.com>
Buy a drill gauge. When I worked in the industry, you could never trust
what was on the bit. I always sorted my bits when I got a new lot of them
in using my drill bit gauge.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Moak [mailto:ken_moak@yahoo.com]
Subject: Re: RV9-List: RV9A Stabilizer
--> RV9-List message posted by: Ken Moak <ken_moak@yahoo.com>
Depending on who you talk to a 41 or a 40 is right for
3/32 rivet. I have tried both not much difference.
Be sure the bit is really the size you think. I
bought some cheap bits once from Harbor Freight and
they were way off. Cost me about $40 when I drilled a
bolt hole too large and had to remake some parts.
When in doubt measure it with a good pair of calipers.
Vans makes mistakes, but I can tell you I have misread
far more than they have written wrong. Found a lot of
people on the list willing to help. It is a lot
cheaper to ask first.
Good Luck
Ken
Wings 90508
--- Warren Smith <adslf45i@tpg.com.au> wrote:
> --> RV9-List message posted by: "Warren Smith"
> <adslf45i@tpg.com.au>
>
> Hi Guys=0D
> =0D
> Horizontal Stabilizer RV9A=0D
> I don't know if any one else has came across this in
> the manual for the RV9a
> in section 6 /6-2 in paragraph 8 on this page it
> says to match drill the
> skins to the skeletal structure, enlarging the
> prepunched 3/32 inch holes
> to #40, this I think is a mistake as the rivets
> supplied for this are exact
> for the 3/32 hole if they are drilled out to #40 the
> rivets will fall
> straight through the holes, either I'm missing
> something or someone at Van's
> have goofed.=0D
> =0D
> The rivets supplied are: AN426AD3-4.=0D
> =0D
> As I have not drilled these holes as yet and don't
> intend to until this is
> clarified.=0D
> =0D
> Any comment or help in this regard will be most
> appreciated.=0D
> =0D
> Thanks Guys=0D
> =0D
> Warren Smith=0D
> Builder from Sydney, Australia.=0D
> adslf45i@tpg.com.au
>
>
>
> Contributions
> any other
> Forums.
>
> latest messages.
> List members.
>
> http://www.matronics.com/subscription
> http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV9-List.htm
> http://www.matronics.com/archives
> http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
> http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV9-List message posted by: Leland <Federigo@pacbell.net>
I asked Ken Scott if I could get away with a single CHT and he said no
because these ships are "experimental". There are individual variations
in the baffling which could cause variations in the heating pattern.
Usually, the front two cylinders are the coolest and some builders
install provisions for "air dams" in front of them to better balance the
temperatures. I am installing the Grand Rapids Model 4000 EIS which
provides all four EGTs, CHTs and most other diagnostic transducers for
less than a thousand dollars (plus $375 for a FuelFlo).
Leland in Pleasanton California
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|