---------------------------------------------------------- RV9-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Mon 08/25/03: 2 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 08:35 AM - Re: RV9A Stabilizer (Pitner, Timothy) 2. 09:34 AM - Re: CHT Probe (Leland) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 08:35:51 AM PST US From: "Pitner, Timothy" Subject: RE: RV9-List: RV9A Stabilizer --> RV9-List message posted by: "Pitner, Timothy" Buy a drill gauge. When I worked in the industry, you could never trust what was on the bit. I always sorted my bits when I got a new lot of them in using my drill bit gauge. Tim -----Original Message----- From: Ken Moak [mailto:ken_moak@yahoo.com] Subject: Re: RV9-List: RV9A Stabilizer --> RV9-List message posted by: Ken Moak Depending on who you talk to a 41 or a 40 is right for 3/32 rivet. I have tried both not much difference. Be sure the bit is really the size you think. I bought some cheap bits once from Harbor Freight and they were way off. Cost me about $40 when I drilled a bolt hole too large and had to remake some parts. When in doubt measure it with a good pair of calipers. Vans makes mistakes, but I can tell you I have misread far more than they have written wrong. Found a lot of people on the list willing to help. It is a lot cheaper to ask first. Good Luck Ken Wings 90508 --- Warren Smith wrote: > --> RV9-List message posted by: "Warren Smith" > > > Hi Guys=0D > =0D > Horizontal Stabilizer RV9A=0D > I don't know if any one else has came across this in > the manual for the RV9a > in section 6 /6-2 in paragraph 8 on this page it > says to match drill the > skins to the skeletal structure, enlarging the > prepunched 3/32 inch holes > to #40, this I think is a mistake as the rivets > supplied for this are exact > for the 3/32 hole if they are drilled out to #40 the > rivets will fall > straight through the holes, either I'm missing > something or someone at Van's > have goofed.=0D > =0D > The rivets supplied are: AN426AD3-4.=0D > =0D > As I have not drilled these holes as yet and don't > intend to until this is > clarified.=0D > =0D > Any comment or help in this regard will be most > appreciated.=0D > =0D > Thanks Guys=0D > =0D > Warren Smith=0D > Builder from Sydney, Australia.=0D > adslf45i@tpg.com.au > > > > Contributions > any other > Forums. > > latest messages. > List members. > > http://www.matronics.com/subscription > http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV9-List.htm > http://www.matronics.com/archives > http://www.matronics.com/photoshare > http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > > > > __________________________________ http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 09:34:57 AM PST US From: Leland Subject: Re: RV9-List: CHT Probe --> RV9-List message posted by: Leland I asked Ken Scott if I could get away with a single CHT and he said no because these ships are "experimental". There are individual variations in the baffling which could cause variations in the heating pattern. Usually, the front two cylinders are the coolest and some builders install provisions for "air dams" in front of them to better balance the temperatures. I am installing the Grand Rapids Model 4000 EIS which provides all four EGTs, CHTs and most other diagnostic transducers for less than a thousand dollars (plus $375 for a FuelFlo). Leland in Pleasanton California