Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:11 AM - Re: EFIS & IFR (DellAngelo, Scott)
2. 09:53 AM - Re: Re: EFIS & IFR (fcs@jlc.net)
3. 11:58 AM - Re: Fw: [RV-9A] Re: AFS Primer (Sargentclt@cs.com)
4. 12:00 PM - Re: Trim Tab Lower Bend (Sargentclt@cs.com)
Message 1
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV9-List message posted by: "DellAngelo, Scott" <SDellAngelo@usg.com>
I thought it went more like "Aircraft restricted to day VFR unless equipped
in accordance with FAR 91.205". If your plane has the criteria of 91.205
then you're ok. Likewise with night VFR. If you meet the criteria then you
are legal. Nothing in 91.205 says anything about TSO's being required.
Scott DellAngelo - #90598
FINALLY ordered wings yesterday (emp done since December)
>>>>It appears that these FAA regs alone are not enough. My FAA
representative and our FAA DAR(who is a homebuilder, too!) has told me that
it is not sufficient to follow all the rules; instead, an FAA rep or DAR
needs to positively approve it. If the instrument avionics are not TSO'ed or
equivalent, then they will not sign off on it. Period.
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> RV9-List message posted by: "fcs@jlc.net" <fcs@jlc.net>
You should take this up in the Blue Mountain newsgroup. There is already
a thread there for this topic, and that's where the solution will come
from. I am flying a BMA EFIS too and had similar questions. But I do not
intend to fly my plane IFR. I only equipped it for IFR as a safety
precaution. RV's are not appropriate airframes for "serious" IFR. Anyone
saying otherwise has never flown "serious" IFR in them. An occasional IFR
climb to clear destination is a much different story.
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Fw: [RV-9A] Re: AFS Primer |
--> RV9-List message posted by: Sargentclt@cs.com
DOUG, FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH I AM USING NAPA PRIMER #15210 IT IS ARMY GREEN AND CAN
BE SANDED OR SCUFFED FOR TOP COATING. IT IS ALSO SELF ETCHING. ANY AREAS THAT
MAY BLEED OVER ON TO THE TOP SURFACE MUST BE SCUFF SANDED FOR ADHESHION.
TALK TO A PAINT SPECIALIST. YOU SHOULD USE EPOXY WITH EPOXY AND EURATHANE WITH
THE LIKE. CALL AIRCRAFT SPRUCE FOR PAINT HELP OR VALSPAR ON VANS WEBSITE FOR
SPECIFICS. I HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF WATER BASED PAINTS. I ONLY USE SOLVENT BASED.
HOPE THIS HELPS TAD 7A "Douglas A. Fischer" <dfischer@iserv.net> wrote:
>--> RV9-List message posted by: "Douglas A. Fischer" <dfischer@iserv.net>
>
>
> I am looking for additional info on this string of messages. I am working on
the Emp (VS, HS, Rudder done) and have also been using the AFS Primer/ Sealer
but all this talk of non-water-based exterior paint not being compatable with
the AFS stuff makes me nervous. I am planning solvent-based exterior due to ability
to sand, repair, etc., but I have very little (read: none) painting experience.
If the exterior primer eats through AFS Sealer, I am wondering if I need
to switch to an epoxy primer and trash-can the AFS. My concern is that using
laquer thinner or MEK to remove all that exposed Sealer may seep through and
ruin the sealer inside the structure. I guess I have a choice ahead - Stick with
AFS and avoid spraying Sealer on areas that will eventually get exterior exposure
and removing the Sealer from exterior areas I've already done, or switch
to epoxy (or whatever primer that is compatable with non-water-based exterior)
and stop using AFS altogether.
>
> Any suggestions / experiences out there? Thanks in advance for any info!
>
> Doug Fischer
> 90706 Emp
>
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Trim Tab Lower Bend |
--> RV9-List message posted by: Sargentclt@cs.com
YOUR HAND. SERIOUSLY THIS IS ON THE BOTTOM OF THE AIRPLANE. WAIT TILL YOU GET
OIL AND DIRT UNDER THERE YOU WILL FORGET ABOUT THE SLIGHT BEND HERE. REALLY.
TAD RV7A"Douglas A. Fischer" <dfischer@iserv.net> wrote:
>--> RV9-List message posted by: "Douglas A. Fischer" <dfischer@iserv.net>
>
>The plans (and the parts) show a need for bending the forward edge of the lower
tab skin for downward travel clearance. Any suggestions for making a nice straight
bend line across the width of the tab?
>
>Doug Fischer
>90706 Emp
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|