Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:16 AM - Fuel return line size (Matthew Brandes)
     2. 07:52 AM - Re: Fuel return line size (Larry PERRYMAN)
     3. 01:54 PM - Re: RV9A Fuel line (Mark Schrimmer)
     4. 05:35 PM - Re: Re: RV9A Fuel line (fcs@jlc.net)
     5. 08:05 PM - Re: Fuel return line size (Tim Coldenhoff)
     6. 08:35 PM - Re: Fuel return line size (Stein Bruch)
     7. 09:52 PM - Re: Baseball and elevator rivets (KDMIGAS@aol.com)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Fuel return line size | 
      
      --> RV9-List message posted by: Matthew Brandes <mbrandes@irr.com>
      
      Gang,
      
      I'm starting on my fuel tanks and want to plan for a fuel return line in
      case I go fuel-injected.  Should the return line be the same size or larger
      than the feed line?  Seems logical that it would be the same size since it
      will only return as much as supplied minus fuel burned.  Am I missing
      something?
      
      Matthew 
      RV-9A (Wings - Tanks)
      #90569
      www.n523rv.com
      ShopCam Online!
      
      
      > 
      > I just installed my fuel lines also except I had the
      > additional problem of a third line to recirculate fuel
      > back to the tanks (Eggenfellner Subaru modification).
      > 
      > I ran the feed line through the top hole, enlarged the
      > middle hole for the return line, and put the brake line
      > through the bottom hole.  On mine, I was able to bend the
      > brake line around the weldment with room to spare as it
      > exited the outboard bracket so there is no contact.
      > 
      > Not sure what you mean by "wander around with many turns"... 
      > Aside from some mild bends to get through the weldment holes, 
      > there is just a "Z" bend where the tube exits the fuse which 
      > I made by hand.  Aesthetically, it leaves a lot to be 
      > desired, but on the other hand, that is what all those covers 
      > are for. :-)
      > -- 
      > Tim Coldenhoff
      > www.deru.com/~rv9a
      > 90338 - plumbing/electrical/finishing
      > 
      > 
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Fuel return line size | 
       10/09/2003 04:51:49 PM,
              Serialize complete at 10/09/2003 04:51:49 PM
      
      --> RV9-List message posted by: "Larry PERRYMAN" <larry.perryman@atofina.com>
      
      This is a multipart message in MIME format.
      --=_alternative 0050DB8686256DBA_=
      
      Matthew,
      
      That is how I did it for my fuel injected Subaru. I understand that the 
      injected Lycomings do not have a return line. You will also need a 6 port 
      fuel valve to return the excess fuel to the tank it came from. 
      
      I put my return line down near the nose of the  tank so that the return 
      line could be run through the alignment holes in the tank ribs (used a 3/8 
      inch snap bushing to protect it). That way the hot fuel is dumped at least 
      one bay back and has time to cool off before making another trip around 
      the loop.
      
      If your tanks are still open, you could run the return line all the say to 
      the far end for maximum cooling. Mine were already done so not an option 
      for me but one bay works fine.
      
      Regards,
      Larry Perryman
      Voice Supervisor
      ATOFINA Petrochemicals Inc.
      (281) 227-5550
      
      
      Matthew Brandes <mbrandes@irr.com>
      Sent by: owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com
      10/09/2003 08:17 AM
      Please respond to rv9-list
      
      
              To:     "'rv9-list@matronics.com'" <rv9-list@matronics.com>
              cc: 
              Subject:        RV9-List: Fuel return line size
      
      
      --> RV9-List message posted by: Matthew Brandes <mbrandes@irr.com>
      
      Gang,
      
      I'm starting on my fuel tanks and want to plan for a fuel return line in
      case I go fuel-injected.  Should the return line be the same size or 
      larger
      than the feed line?  Seems logical that it would be the same size since it
      will only return as much as supplied minus fuel burned.  Am I missing
      something?
      
      Matthew 
      RV-9A (Wings - Tanks)
      #90569
      www.n523rv.com
      
      
      --=_alternative 0050DB8686256DBA_=
      
      
      <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Matthew,</font>
      <br>
      <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">That is how I did it for my fuel injected Subaru.
      I understand that the injected Lycomings do not have a return line. You
      will also need a 6 port fuel valve to return the excess fuel to the tank it came
      from. </font>
      <br>
      <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I put my return line down near the nose of the
       tank so that the return line could be run through the alignment holes
      in the tank ribs (used a 3/8 inch snap bushing to protect it). That way the hot
      fuel is dumped at least one bay back and has time to cool off before making
      another trip around the loop.</font>
      <br>
      <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">If your tanks are still open, you could run
      the return line all the say to the far end for maximum cooling. Mine were already
      done so not an option for me but one bay works fine.</font>
      <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> <br>
      Regards,<br>
      Larry Perryman<br>
      Voice Supervisor<br>
      ATOFINA Petrochemicals Inc.<br>
      (281) 227-5550</font>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <table width=100%>
      <tr valign=top>
      <td>
      <td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Matthew Brandes <mbrandes@irr.com></b></font>
      <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com</font>
      <p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">10/09/2003 08:17 AM</font>
      <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to rv9-list</font>
      <br>
      <td><font size=1 face="Arial">        </font>
      <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">        To:    
         "'rv9-list@matronics.com'" <rv9-list@matronics.com></font>
      <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">        cc:    
         </font>
      <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">        Subject:  
           RV9-List: Fuel return line size</font></table>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br><font size=2 face="Courier New">--> RV9-List message posted by: Matthew
      Brandes <mbrandes@irr.com><br>
      <br>
      Gang,<br>
      <br>
      I'm starting on my fuel tanks and want to plan for a fuel return line in<br>
      case I go fuel-injected.  Should the return line be the same size or larger<br>
      than the feed line?  Seems logical that it would be the same size since it<br>
      will only return as much as supplied minus fuel burned.  Am I missing<br>
      something?<br>
      <br>
      Matthew <br>
      RV-9A (Wings - Tanks)<br>
      #90569<br>
      www.n523rv.com<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      </font>
      <br>
      <br>
      --=_alternative 0050DB8686256DBA_=--
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: RV9A Fuel line | 
      
      --> RV9-List message posted by: Mark Schrimmer <mschrimmer@pacbell.net>
      
      I asked Van's if it was OK to move the fuel line to the top hole. Here is
      their answer:
      
      "The FAA does not like wires run below fuel lines.  That's why the
      wire hole is at the top.  Some builders have replaced the rigid lines
      with flexible hose.  We know that it's a pain to route the lines
      through the gear leg brackets and the support ribs.  I spoke to a
      builder that did as you requested and used the top hole and his
      inspector didn't say anything."
      
      
      A question for those of you who put the fuel lines in the bottom--was it
      really as difficult as it seems?
      
      Mark Schrimmer
      Irvine, CA
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: RV9A Fuel line | 
      
      --> RV9-List message posted by: "fcs@jlc.net" <fcs@jlc.net>
      
      
       Any A&P knows not to run fuel lines above wiring, but I suggest that you
      refrain from running ANY wiring along the front of the spar to begin with. 
      There is simply no need to run wires there.  You can bring your wiring down
      inside the side spar caps and route them under the seat floors from there. 
      I ran all antenna coax down my right spar cap and all airframe wiring down
      the left spar cap.  Works great.  Just make sure you consider how far the
      wings insert so you don't run into your wires.  You can also run wires
      along the center tunnel from firewall back if you need to.
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Fuel return line size | 
      
      --> RV9-List message posted by: Tim Coldenhoff <rv9a_000@deru.com>
      
      Matthew Brandes wrote:
      > --> RV9-List message posted by: Matthew Brandes 
      > I'm starting on my fuel tanks and want to plan for a fuel return line in
      > case I go fuel-injected.  Should the return line be the same size or larger
      > than the feed line?  Seems logical that it would be the same size since it
      > will only return as much as supplied minus fuel burned.  Am I missing
      > something?
      > 
      
      You are not missing anything - you can't return what
      you are not fed.
      
      For the Eggenfellner Subaru installation, the stock
      feed lines are used which are 3/8" OD.  The return lines
      are slightly smaller at 5/16" OD.
      
      You should really check with your (eventual) engine mfgr.
      about fuel system modifications.  In fact, I would not worry
      about it too much until you are working on plumbing the fuselage.
      By that time you should have your engine choice nailed down.
      
      You can also delay sealing the cover plates onto your fuel
      tank until you are sure about your engine choice and wether
      the tanks will require mods.  Just store your proseal in a cool
      place...
      -- 
      Tim Coldenhoff
      www.deru.com/~rv9a
      90338 - plumbing/electrical/finishing
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Fuel return line size | 
      
      --> RV9-List message posted by: "Stein Bruch" <stein@steinair.com>
      
      Hi Matthew,
      
      Just a quick note, if you're using a Lycosaur with Bendix, AFP, or Ellsion
      TBI, you don't need a return line.
      
      Cheers,
      Stein Bruch
      RV6's, Minneapolis
      
      http://www.steinair.com
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Matthew Brandes
      Subject: RV9-List: Fuel return line size
      
      
      --> RV9-List message posted by: Matthew Brandes <mbrandes@irr.com>
      
      Gang,
      
      I'm starting on my fuel tanks and want to plan for a fuel return line in
      case I go fuel-injected.  Should the return line be the same size or larger
      than the feed line?  Seems logical that it would be the same size since it
      will only return as much as supplied minus fuel burned.  Am I missing
      something?
      
      Matthew
      RV-9A (Wings - Tanks)
      #90569
      www.n523rv.com
      ShopCam Online!
      
      
      >
      > I just installed my fuel lines also except I had the
      > additional problem of a third line to recirculate fuel
      > back to the tanks (Eggenfellner Subaru modification).
      >
      > I ran the feed line through the top hole, enlarged the
      > middle hole for the return line, and put the brake line
      > through the bottom hole.  On mine, I was able to bend the
      > brake line around the weldment with room to spare as it
      > exited the outboard bracket so there is no contact.
      >
      > Not sure what you mean by "wander around with many turns"...
      > Aside from some mild bends to get through the weldment holes,
      > there is just a "Z" bend where the tube exits the fuse which
      > I made by hand.  Aesthetically, it leaves a lot to be
      > desired, but on the other hand, that is what all those covers
      > are for. :-)
      > --
      > Tim Coldenhoff
      > www.deru.com/~rv9a
      > 90338 - plumbing/electrical/finishing
      >
      >
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Baseball and elevator rivets | 
      
      --> RV9-List message posted by: KDMIGAS@aol.com
      
      
      If you have some places that are hard to buck,ot in place of pop rivets 
      suggest cherry max..3214-4-2 is the size. they fit in a #40 dimple but the hole
      is 
      enlarged to a #30. Work really well in those places near the ends of skin etc 
      where it is hard to reach My eaa tech guy liked them. I think airspruce has 
      them
      
      Dick Migas RV9A, fuselage finished
      
      
      <HTML><FONT FACEarial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE2 FAMILY"SANSSERIF" FACE=
      "Arial" LANG"0">If you have some places that are hard to buck,ot in pl=
      ace of pop rivets suggest cherry max..3214-4-2 is the size. they fit in a #4=
      0 dimple but the hole is enlarged to a #30. Work really well in those places=
       near the ends of skin etc where it is hard to reach My eaa tech guy liked t=
      hem. I think airspruce has them<BR>
      <BR>
      Dick Migas RV9A, fuselage finished</FONT></HTML>
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |