Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:39 AM - Re: alternative static ports (ivo welch)
2. 12:56 PM - Re: Re: alternative static ports (Terry Hobert)
3. 09:35 PM - Re: Re: alternative static ports (Ralph Cloud)
Message 1
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | re: alternative static ports |
--> RV9-List message posted by: ivo welch <ivo.welch@yale.edu>
hi doug: personally, I think this may be misguided. For $2,000, you can get
a dynon efis system, which can be a backup in virtually every possible way.
It functions more accurately, IMHO, than the ordinary aircraft systems. (I
have one, and love it.) And this will also make fail-detection far faster.
I would just put in the 6 ordinary instruments, plus one dynon.
regards,
/iaw
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: re: alternative static ports |
--> RV9-List message posted by: "Terry Hobert" <terhobey@hotmail.com>
Right on Ivo,
I seen the dynon at arlington and thought "that's the way to go" if I go
all electric and want a gyro horizon, that is right at about a $1000 anyway!
Stick the D10 in the that top middle spot and you've got all you need.
Terry Hobert 9A, wings finishing up
Do not archive
>From: ivo welch <ivo.welch@yale.edu>
>Reply-To: rv9-list@matronics.com
>To: rv9-list@matronics.com
>Subject: RV9-List: re: alternative static ports
>Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:38:13 -0500
>
>--> RV9-List message posted by: ivo welch <ivo.welch@yale.edu>
>
>
>hi doug: personally, I think this may be misguided. For $2,000, you can
>get
>a dynon efis system, which can be a backup in virtually every possible way.
>It functions more accurately, IMHO, than the ordinary aircraft systems. (I
>have one, and love it.) And this will also make fail-detection far faster.
>
>I would just put in the 6 ordinary instruments, plus one dynon.
>
>regards,
>
>/iaw
>
>
MSN Shopping upgraded for the holidays! Snappier product search...
http://shopping.msn.com
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | re: alternative static ports |
--> RV9-List message posted by: "Ralph Cloud" <rv9ralph@flash.net>
You still need a static air source... regardless of how much technology you
use.
Ralph
do not archive
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of ivo welch
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 6:38 AM
> To: rv9-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RV9-List: re: alternative static ports
>
>
> --> RV9-List message posted by: ivo welch <ivo.welch@yale.edu>
>
>
> hi doug: personally, I think this may be misguided. For $2,000,
> you can get
> a dynon efis system, which can be a backup in virtually every
> possible way.
> It functions more accurately, IMHO, than the ordinary aircraft
> systems. (I
> have one, and love it.) And this will also make fail-detection
> far faster.
>
> I would just put in the 6 ordinary instruments, plus one dynon.
>
> regards,
>
> /iaw
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|