----------------------------------------------------------
                           RV9-List Digest Archive
                                      ---
                     Total Messages Posted Thu 11/13/03: 3
           ----------------------------------------------------------
 
 
Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:39 AM - Re: alternative static ports  (ivo welch)
     2. 12:56 PM - Re: Re: alternative static ports  (Terry Hobert)
     3. 09:35 PM - Re: Re: alternative static ports  (Ralph Cloud)
 
 
 
________________________________  Message 1  _____________________________________


Time: 06:39:02 AM PST US
From: ivo welch <ivo.welch@yale.edu>
Subject: RV9-List: re: alternative static ports

--> RV9-List message posted by: ivo welch <ivo.welch@yale.edu>


hi doug:  personally, I think this may be misguided.  For $2,000, you can get 
a dynon efis system, which can be a backup in virtually every possible way. 
It functions more accurately, IMHO, than the ordinary aircraft systems.  (I 
have one, and love it.)  And this will also make fail-detection far faster.

I would just put in the 6 ordinary instruments, plus one dynon.

regards,

/iaw






________________________________  Message 2  _____________________________________


Time: 12:56:25 PM PST US
From: "Terry Hobert" <terhobey@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: RV9-List: re: alternative static ports

--> RV9-List message posted by: "Terry Hobert" <terhobey@hotmail.com>

Right on Ivo,
I seen the dynon at arlington and thought "that's the way to go"  if I go 
all electric and want a gyro horizon, that is right at about a $1000 anyway! 
  Stick the D10 in the that top middle spot and you've got all you need.

Terry Hobert 9A, wings finishing up
Do not archive


>From: ivo welch <ivo.welch@yale.edu>
>Reply-To: rv9-list@matronics.com
>To: rv9-list@matronics.com
>Subject: RV9-List: re: alternative static ports
>Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:38:13 -0500
>
>--> RV9-List message posted by: ivo welch <ivo.welch@yale.edu>
>
>
>hi doug:  personally, I think this may be misguided.  For $2,000, you can 
>get
>a dynon efis system, which can be a backup in virtually every possible way.
>It functions more accurately, IMHO, than the ordinary aircraft systems.  (I
>have one, and love it.)  And this will also make fail-detection far faster.
>
>I would just put in the 6 ordinary instruments, plus one dynon.
>
>regards,
>
>/iaw
>
>

MSN Shopping upgraded for the holidays!  Snappier product search... 
http://shopping.msn.com






________________________________  Message 3  _____________________________________


Time: 09:35:22 PM PST US
From: "Ralph Cloud" <rv9ralph@flash.net>
Subject: RE: RV9-List: re: alternative static ports

--> RV9-List message posted by: "Ralph Cloud" <rv9ralph@flash.net>

You still need a static air source... regardless of how much technology you
use.

Ralph
do not archive

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of ivo welch
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 6:38 AM
> To: rv9-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RV9-List: re: alternative static ports
>
>
> --> RV9-List message posted by: ivo welch <ivo.welch@yale.edu>
>
>
> hi doug:  personally, I think this may be misguided.  For $2,000,
> you can get
> a dynon efis system, which can be a backup in virtually every
> possible way.
> It functions more accurately, IMHO, than the ordinary aircraft
> systems.  (I
> have one, and love it.)  And this will also make fail-detection
> far faster.
>
> I would just put in the 6 ordinary instruments, plus one dynon.
>
> regards,
>
> /iaw
>
>