RV9-List Digest Archive

Sat 01/24/04


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:00 AM - Re: RV6-List: RV fuselages (Jim Oke)
     2. 05:01 PM - Re: Interchangeable Cowlings? (robert watson)
     3. 06:08 PM - Possible elevator defect (Paul Eastham)
     4. 06:35 PM - Re: Possible elevator defect (Bob Kelly)
     5. 10:00 PM - Fuselage tail bottom skin (The Strong's)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:00:19 AM PST US
    From: Jim Oke <wjoke@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: RV6-List: RV fuselages
    --> RV9-List message posted by: Jim Oke <wjoke@shaw.ca> This goes back to differences in the basic wing structure. The -6 wing spars extent to the centre line of the aircraft and mate there with splice plates, etc. Thus, due to the wing dihedral angle, the fuselage bottom has to have a vee shape to accommodate the spars with minimum waste space. The -7, -8, -9 all use a three part spar with a centre section and left and right joins just at the fuselage side. The centre section can be made straight and so the fuselage bottom can be built flat. I think Vans should be commended for some clever design and parts standardization to keep inventory and costs down. This plus the introduction of CNC manufacturing is what makes the newer RV kits such an outstanding value while still allowing Vans to make a decent profit (at least I hope he is). Thus we all benefit. Jim Oke RV-3 RV-6A Wpg., MB ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dean Psiropoulos" <deanpsir@easystreet.com> <rv6-list@matronics.com> Subject: RV6-List: RV fuselages > --> RV6-List message posted by: "Dean Psiropoulos" <deanpsir@easystreet.com> > > The RV-7 and RV-9 fuselages are identical Konrad. Thats how Van's keeps his > prices (and inventory) so low. In case you didn't realize it, the RV-7 is > an RV-9 fuselage mated to the aerobatic wings and tail of the RV-8. I > suspect the RV-6 fuselage is also the same dimensions at the firewall so a > -6 cowl should fit on the -7 and -9. It's the wing mounting structure and > Vee shaped forward fuselage bottom that are different on the RV-6 (RV-7/9 > fuselages have a flat bottom under the wing spar carry through structure)... > along with a few other subtle changes that make the RV-7 and 9 parts able to > be designed on CAD and punched out on the CNC punch machine. > > > Dean Psiropoulos > > RV-6A, Canopy frame headaches > > > Time: 01:56:00 PM PST US > > From: <klwerner@comcast.net> > > <rv9-list@matronics.com> > > Subject: RV6-List: Interchangeable Cowlings? > > > --> RV6-List message posted by: <klwerner@comcast.net> > > > Greetings, > > Does anyone know if the cowlings for the -6, -7 & -9 airframes are > interchangeable? > > > In other words, are the firewall dimensions of the side-by-side airframes > the same (or at least pretty darn close)? > > > Thanks for any input, > > Konrad > > Do not archive > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:01:29 PM PST US
    From: robert watson <bob1629r@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Interchangeable Cowlings?
    --> RV9-List message posted by: robert watson <bob1629r@earthlink.net> Yes when i built my 9 the cowl was marked as a 6 from vans -----Original Message----- From: Roger Evenson <revenson@comcast.net> Subject: Re: RV9-List: Interchangeable Cowlings? --> RV9-List message posted by: "Roger Evenson" <revenson@comcast.net> yes for the 7 and 9; probably not for the 6. ----- Original Message ----- From: <klwerner@comcast.net> <rv9-list@matronics.com> Subject: RV9-List: Interchangeable Cowlings? > --> RV9-List message posted by: <klwerner@comcast.net> > > Greetings, > Does anyone know if the cowlings for the -6, -7 & -9 airframes are interchangeable? > In other words, are the firewall dimensions of the side-by-side airframes the same (or at least pretty darn close)? > > Thanks for any input, > Konrad > Do not archive > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:08:25 PM PST US
    From: Paul Eastham <eastham@netapp.com>
    Subject: Possible elevator defect
    --> RV9-List message posted by: Paul Eastham <eastham@netapp.com> Hi all, I was installing my elevator trim the other day and found that I apparently received incorrect platenuts in my emp kit. I seem to have gotten platenuts for -8 screws instead of the supplied -6 screws. The -6 screws go into the -08 platenuts just fine, but strip out if you tighten them hard... it was not immidiately obvious to me that there was a problem until I compared the size of the installed nuts with -06 nuts from my wing kit. (There are not supposed to be any -08 platenuts in the emp kit, so I don't see how else I would have accidentally installed the oversize platenuts on my elevator) I did alert Van's about this, and they said they would check their stock. They did not offer a workaround, but I plan to just redimple the access plate for -8...the 8 screws just barely fit through the existing holes. Then hopefully the dimples on the elevator itself will enlarge on their own when I install the screw. Anyway, I'd recommend that you check your elevator and make sure you can snug up those screws nice and tight. It would probably be bad if that plate (and servo) dropped off in flight. Paul (90804) http://hmb.dyndns.org/~eastham/rv


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:35:26 PM PST US
    From: Bob Kelly <mmpi@missionmedia.org>
    Subject: Re: Possible elevator defect
    Paul, --> RV9-List message posted by: Bob Kelly <mmpi@missionmedia.org> I received BOTH sizes nutplates with my kit, #8's in the bags with the main part of the kit and #6's in the box with the trim motor. I used the 6's and am happy with the way everything went together. I am just beginning to realize that the 8's are extra parts at this point. I haven't found a use for them and am just about done with the emp. I don't recall if the inventory called them out as 8's or 6's. I wouldn't have caught the problem then as they are close in size. Bob Kelly 90854 On 24-Jan-04, Paul Eastham wrote: > --> RV9-List message posted by: Paul Eastham <eastham@netapp.com> > > Hi all, > I was installing my elevator trim the other day and found that I > apparently received incorrect platenuts in my emp kit. I seem to have > gotten platenuts for -8 screws instead of the supplied -6 screws. The -6 > screws go into the -08 platenuts just fine, but strip out if you tighten > them hard... it was not immidiately obvious to me that there was a problem > until I compared the size of the installed nuts with -06 nuts from my wing > kit. > > (There are not supposed to be any -08 platenuts in the emp kit, so I > don't see how else I would have accidentally installed the oversize > platenuts on my elevator) > > I did alert Van's about this, and they said they would check their > stock. They did not offer a workaround, but I plan to just redimple > the access plate for -8...the 8 screws just barely fit through the > existing holes. Then hopefully the dimples on the elevator itself > will enlarge on their own when I install the screw. > > Anyway, I'd recommend that you check your elevator and make sure you > can snug up those screws nice and tight. It would probably be bad if > that plate (and servo) dropped off in flight. > > Paul (90804) > http://hmb.dyndns.org/~eastham/rv > > > > > > > Regards


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:00:21 PM PST US
    From: "The Strong's" <tstrong@ida.net>
    Subject: Fuselage tail bottom skin
    --> RV9-List message posted by: "The Strong's" <tstrong@ida.net> What is the order for the lower J stiffener, tail bottom skin and aft side skin? I have the J stiffner next to the Bulkhead then the Tail bottom skin and then the aft side skin. That seems the logical way but it leaves a small step as the J stiffner goes forward from the tail bottom skin to the aft side skin. Thanks, Tom




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv9-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV9-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv9-list
  • Browse RV9-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv9-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --