RV9-List Digest Archive

Mon 03/08/04


Total Messages Posted: 7



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:24 AM -  (Roger Crandell)
     2. 07:47 AM - Re: FW: dimpling (tchoug@micron.com)
     3. 07:48 AM - Re: dimpling (Bill Ervin)
     4. 08:34 AM - Re: FW: dimpling (Richard Tasker)
     5. 08:52 AM - Re: FW: dimpling (tchoug@micron.com)
     6. 09:20 AM - Re: FW: dimpling (DThomas773@aol.com)
     7. 08:16 PM - empennage question (G B)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:24:52 AM PST US
    From: "Roger Crandell" <rwc000@hotmail.com>
    rv8-list@matronics.com, rv9-list@matronics.com --> RV9-List message posted by: "Roger Crandell" <rwc000@hotmail.com> Can anyone recommend a source for a two port (two transducer) manifold? Van's sells a three port unit, but I only need two ports. I could cut off one port on the Van's unit, but would rather not do that. Thanks Roger Crandell Get business advice and resources to improve your work life, from bCentral.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:47:52 AM PST US
    From: tchoug@micron.com
    Subject: FW: dimpling
    --> RV9-List message posted by: tchoug@micron.com I also built a five legged workbench with a built in recess for the C-frame. The fifth leg is directly under the C-frame to provide support for the pounding that it will take. It also has a sacrificial work surface that can be drilled into and clecod to also. Here's a tip when using the C-frame for dimpling . . . It sounds like some people are dimpling with the face (outside surface) up which requires careful alignment and holding the male dimple die in the hole by hand. I've always dimpled with the face down and the male die in the bottom of the C-frame. You simply slide the sheet over the male die and let it protrude through the hole. Then you can strike the dimple without having to hold the dies in alignment. With this method I generally use two hits to form a good dimple. The first is a lighter hit that forms 70-80% of the dimple and is less likely to cause radial cracks in the aluminum. The second hit is firmer and forms a nice clean dimple. Todd Houg Fuselage just about ready to flip right side up! -----Original Message----- From: Bill Repucci [mailto:bill@repucci.com] Subject: RV9-List: FW: dimpling --> RV9-List message posted by: "Bill Repucci" <bill@repucci.com> I thought I would forward this on for the others to follow. The picture should help everyone understand how to get good dimples and as Tad said, us a good hammer and hit each hole only once and hit it hard. Bill R. RV-9 SN: 90737 -----Original Message----- From: Bill Repucci [mailto:bill@repucci.com] Subject: RE: dimpling Randy, Not a problem, the trick is to build some small tables that will rest on either side of the C frame so the surface is level or just a little above the height of the dimple die. If you don't do this you will put smiley faces around each dimple because the skin isn't level. Then lower the dimple by hand and hold it down in each hole before hitting it with the hammer. If you don't do this, there is a good chance you will miss the hole and punch a new one in the wrong place. (Don't ask how I know this!) See the picture on my web site: http://www.repucci.com/bill/images/Dimpling%20the%20left%20HS%20skin001. jpg This should help explain how it works. Bill R. -----Original Message----- From: Randy [mailto:rer51@lincsat.com] Subject: dimpling I am also a newbie. I have the hs to the point of dimpling and riveting. I have looked at the dimpler riveter, and I am absolutely perplexed on how to use it without damaging the other surface of the hs skins. It appears that the stand would sit directly on the other surface while dimpling the one side. I am a retired tool and die guy, and this apparatus isn't logical to me. I looks like it would work on the edges, but on the deep parts where the skin curves... HELP!!! Randy == direct advertising on the Matronics Forums. == == ==


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:48:55 AM PST US
    From: Bill Ervin <n57wc@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: dimpling
    --> RV9-List message posted by: Bill Ervin <n57wc@yahoo.com> If you haven't bought a C-frame yet check into Experimentalaero.com, the DRDT-2. Its does great dimples and makes a lot less noise (None) Its also easier to control the metal sheet and dimple at the same time. Bill __________________________________ http://search.yahoo.com


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:34:50 AM PST US
    From: Richard Tasker <retasker@optonline.net>
    Subject: Re: FW: dimpling
    --> RV9-List message posted by: Richard Tasker <retasker@optonline.net> tchoug@micron.com wrote: >I've always dimpled with the face down and the male die in the >bottom of the C-frame. You simply slide the sheet over the male die and >let it protrude through the hole. Then you can strike the dimple without >having to hold the dies in alignment. With this method I generally use >two hits to form a good dimple. The first is a lighter hit that forms >70-80% of the dimple and is less likely to cause radial cracks in the >aluminum. The second hit is firmer and forms a nice clean dimple. > > Be careful when doing this without holding the dimple die down. I did it your way at first and discovered that the male die was not always centered relative to the female die - causing wear on each die. I suspect this was due to slight play in the bronze bushing holding the vertical rod that the female die was in. Also, hitting it any way but perfectly vertically would guarantee that any play would make the dies hit slightly off center. If you choose to do it this way, make sure that there is an absolute minimum amount of clearance between the two dies - just enough to get the aluminum sheet between them. Now I still put the male die on the bottom, but I also now hold the dies together before I make the hit. Dick Tasker, 90573


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:52:41 AM PST US
    From: tchoug@micron.com
    Subject: FW: dimpling
    --> RV9-List message posted by: tchoug@micron.com That's a good point Dick, I do adjust the slider shaft with the female die to float just above the work. I have noticed a bit of wear on the tip of the male die from slightly off center strikes, but nothing that effects the formation of the dimple. This has worked well for me with 98% of the dimpling behind me now - Yeah!!! Todd -----Original Message----- From: Richard Tasker [mailto:retasker@optonline.net] Subject: Re: RV9-List: FW: dimpling --> RV9-List message posted by: Richard Tasker <retasker@optonline.net> tchoug@micron.com wrote: >I've always dimpled with the face down and the male die in the bottom >of the C-frame. You simply slide the sheet over the male die and let it >protrude through the hole. Then you can strike the dimple without >having to hold the dies in alignment. With this method I generally use >two hits to form a good dimple. The first is a lighter hit that forms >70-80% of the dimple and is less likely to cause radial cracks in the >aluminum. The second hit is firmer and forms a nice clean dimple. > > Be careful when doing this without holding the dimple die down. I did it your way at first and discovered that the male die was not always centered relative to the female die - causing wear on each die. I suspect this was due to slight play in the bronze bushing holding the vertical rod that the female die was in. Also, hitting it any way but perfectly vertically would guarantee that any play would make the dies hit slightly off center. If you choose to do it this way, make sure that there is an absolute minimum amount of clearance between the two dies - just enough to get the aluminum sheet between them. Now I still put the male die on the bottom, but I also now hold the dies together before I make the hit. Dick Tasker, 90573 == direct advertising on the Matronics Forums. == == ==


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:20:25 AM PST US
    From: DThomas773@aol.com
    Subject: Re: FW: dimpling
    --> RV9-List message posted by: DThomas773@aol.com I agree with Dick. It is better to bring the dies together with hand pressure before the hammer comes down. I found also, if you have the male die on the bottom, you need to exercise care not to let the aluminum slide over the male pilot. It will scratch the BeJesus out of your alclad. Dennis Thomas


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:16:49 PM PST US
    From: G B <microsys@alltel.net>
    Subject: empennage question
    --> RV9-List message posted by: G B <microsys@alltel.net> Hello, I need help right off the bat with the RV-9 empennage! There are three small holes punched into the HS-907 doubler plate that are NOT in the HS-902 front spar. I am assuming that the hole nearest the center of the spar is the 'alignment' hole for the two angles I have to make. What are the two other holes for, or, asked in another way, why are they not punched through? They look like they are along the top edge of the spar, not the bottom. Can you help me clear this up? Thanks, Glen




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv9-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV9-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv9-list
  • Browse RV9-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv9-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --