----------------------------------------------------------
                           RV9-List Digest Archive
                                      ---
                     Total Messages Posted Fri 05/28/04: 3
           ----------------------------------------------------------
 
 
Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:54 AM - Re: Engine mounts  (Neilekins@aol.com)
     2. 05:32 AM - Re: Re: Engine mounts  (Jim Brandvold)
     3. 08:32 AM - Re: Re: Engine mounts  (Neilekins@aol.com)
 
 
 
________________________________  Message 1  _____________________________________


Time: 03:54:28 AM PST US
From: Neilekins@aol.com
Subject: RV9-List: Re: Engine mounts

--> RV9-List message posted by: Neilekins@aol.com

Is there any benefit from one type of mount to another? Dynafocal vs Conical? 
....Neil   Florida






________________________________  Message 2  _____________________________________


Time: 05:32:20 AM PST US
From: Jim Brandvold <jbrandv@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: RV9-List: Re: Engine mounts

--> RV9-List message posted by: Jim Brandvold <jbrandv@worldnet.att.net>

Yes, one will fit your engine the other won't.  Lycoming makes two 
different mounting configurations.  The difference is in the angle that 
the bolts go through with respect to the engine.

Jim Brandvold
N209RV

Neilekins@aol.com wrote:

>--> RV9-List message posted by: Neilekins@aol.com
>
>Is there any benefit from one type of mount to another? Dynafocal vs Conical?

>....Neil   Florida
>
>
>  
>






________________________________  Message 3  _____________________________________


Time: 08:32:13 AM PST US
From: Neilekins@aol.com
Subject: Re: RV9-List: Re: Engine mounts

--> RV9-List message posted by: Neilekins@aol.com

Yes, I know there is a difference between the two mounts. I think you can 
order either from Vans. Is one stronger or better. I think ones is easier to 
mount?