Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:29 PM - Re: Re: Engine mounts (James Nelson)
2. 01:51 PM - Re: Re: Engine mounts (Ladyrat01@aol.com)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engine mounts |
--> RV9-List message posted by: James Nelson <europajim@juno.com>
Jim,
The other is with the dynafocal mounts, there is a reduction of
vibration transmitted to the airframe.
Jim Nelson
On Fri, 28 May 2004 06:40:22 -0600 Jim Brandvold
<jbrandv@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> --> RV9-List message posted by: Jim Brandvold
> <jbrandv@worldnet.att.net>
>
> Yes, one will fit your engine the other won't. Lycoming makes two
> different mounting configurations. The difference is in the angle
> that
> the bolts go through with respect to the engine.
>
> Jim Brandvold
> N209RV
>
> Neilekins@aol.com wrote:
>
> >--> RV9-List message posted by: Neilekins@aol.com
> >
> >Is there any benefit from one type of mount to another? Dynafocal
> vs Conical?
> >....Neil Florida
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
=
>
=
>
=
> >
>
>
>
>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engine mounts |
--> RV9-List message posted by: Ladyrat01@aol.com
I have not asked to be on this list please get me off or i will report you
TWATS
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|