----------------------------------------------------------
                           RV9-List Digest Archive
                                      ---
                     Total Messages Posted Sat 05/29/04: 2
           ----------------------------------------------------------
 
 
Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:29 PM - Re: Re: Engine mounts  (James Nelson)
     2. 01:51 PM - Re: Re: Engine mounts  (Ladyrat01@aol.com)
 
 
 
________________________________  Message 1  _____________________________________


Time: 12:29:27 PM PST US
Subject: Re: RV9-List: Re: Engine mounts
From: James Nelson <europajim@juno.com>

--> RV9-List message posted by: James Nelson <europajim@juno.com>

Jim,
        The other is with the dynafocal mounts, there is a reduction of
vibration transmitted to the airframe.

Jim Nelson


On Fri, 28 May 2004 06:40:22 -0600 Jim Brandvold
<jbrandv@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> --> RV9-List message posted by: Jim Brandvold 
> <jbrandv@worldnet.att.net>
> 
> Yes, one will fit your engine the other won't.  Lycoming makes two 
> different mounting configurations.  The difference is in the angle 
> that 
> the bolts go through with respect to the engine.
> 
> Jim Brandvold
> N209RV
> 
> Neilekins@aol.com wrote:
> 
> >--> RV9-List message posted by: Neilekins@aol.com
> >
> >Is there any benefit from one type of mount to another? Dynafocal 
> vs Conical? 
> >....Neil   Florida
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
>
=
>
=
>
=
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 






________________________________  Message 2  _____________________________________


Time: 01:51:44 PM PST US
From: Ladyrat01@aol.com
Subject: Re: RV9-List: Re: Engine mounts

--> RV9-List message posted by: Ladyrat01@aol.com

I have not asked to be on this list please get me off or i will report you  
TWATS