Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 10:33 AM - Re: Engines (Douglas A. Fischer)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
clamav-milter version 0.80j
on mail5.iserv.net
--> RV9-List message posted by: "Douglas A. Fischer" <dfischer@iserv.net>
My intention is a 160hp IO-320 with C.S. prop. The biggest reason? There
are no rpm restrictions on the 320. When I fly, I don't want to have to
remember what rpms aren't good for constant operation on the third Tuesday
of months that end in "R", etc. I've seen the posts about true horsepower
at 7,500 feet, but I'll settle for the lower power and go with Van's
recommendation - he knows the plane more than I do. I live in lower
elevations, so high-altitude take-off operations will be rare to
non-existent.
Doug
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne Williams" <rwayne@gamewood.net>
Subject: RV9-List: Engines
> --> RV9-List message posted by: "Wayne Williams" <rwayne@gamewood.net>
>
> What engine are most thinking of using? I'm leaning towards an 0-360 180hp
> fixed pitch.
> Seems to me the extra 20hp (over the recommended 160hp) will make up for
not
> having a CS prop on climb.
>
>
> Wayne
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|