RV9-List Digest Archive

Sun 08/07/05


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 07:16 AM - Re: RV9-List Digest: 4 Msgs - 08/06/05 (Mark Taylor)
     2. 11:16 AM - Re: Re: RV9-List Digest: 4 Msgs - 08/06/05 (Ken)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:16:30 AM PST US
    From: "Mark Taylor" <mtaylo17@msn.com>
    Subject: RE: RV9-List Digest: 4 Msgs - 08/06/05
    --> RV9-List message posted by: "Mark Taylor" <mtaylo17@msn.com> It is true that it takes a certain amount of fuel to obtain a certain horsepower. By limiting his power, he'll also be limiting his fuel right?! Also, we're not talking about the difference between an RV and a Mig 15 that burns 80 gals for a high speed pass down the runway here are we?! Mark www.4sierratango.com >Time: 05:24:36 PM PST US >From: "Ralph Cloud" <rv9ralph@flash.net> >Subject: RE: RV9-List: Engine decision time ... > >--> RV9-List message posted by: "Ralph Cloud" <rv9ralph@flash.net> > >I'll throw my $.02 in. On the Superior Air Parts XP 360 website they >have a position paper on why you can use "their" derated XP-360 in a >Vans RV-9. Why? They want you to buy their engine. Just remember - >higher HP = higher GPH!! > >Personally, I will use a IO-320 clone. Also, in a RVator from several >issues back, Vans addressed the effect on Vne of carrying too much HP to >higher altitudes. > >The fuse, verticle stabilizer and rudder are identical between the 7 & 9 >series. The cracks were from the rivets on the stiffners on the rudder. >I have seen these same cracks on a RV-4 rudder, however on the 4 the >cracks were on the hinge end of the stiffners. My personal, uneducated >theory on the origin of the cracks is from work hardening the metal from >over "smacking" the dimpler on the skins and over driving the rivets on >the stiffners. > >Ralph >RV9A wings, fuse in box >Livermore, CA


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:16:33 AM PST US
    From: "Ken" <4aero2plane@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: RE: RV9-List Digest: 4 Msgs - 08/06/05
    --> RV9-List message posted by: "Ken" <4aero2plane@sbcglobal.net> Mark You are right, about 20,000 BTUs per pound of AV gas. If the volumetric efficiency is the same, producing the same HP, the only extra fuel burn would be from the increase in weight and friction difference of the larger engine, maybe 1 percent. The really sad part is we only get about 30 - 40 percent efficiency. This is where the auto conversion people can point and laugh at us using a Lycosaur. We lose about 40 - 45 percent out the exhaust and 15 to 20 percent in cooling, and 5 - 10 percent to friction. So their turbo charged water cooled engines are much better in that respect. At least for me the stupid human variable that burns more fuel, I tend to want to push the throttle a little more, go a little faster....hey it's only 75%. Maybe instead of looking at an O-320 or O-360 I should start looking for that 118 hp engine vans gives specs on... Ken -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv9-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mark Taylor Subject: RV9-List: RE: RV9-List Digest: 4 Msgs - 08/06/05 --> RV9-List message posted by: "Mark Taylor" <mtaylo17@msn.com> It is true that it takes a certain amount of fuel to obtain a certain horsepower. By limiting his power, he'll also be limiting his fuel right?! Also, we're not talking about the difference between an RV and a Mig 15 that burns 80 gals for a high speed pass down the runway here are we?! Mark www.4sierratango.com >Time: 05:24:36 PM PST US >From: "Ralph Cloud" <rv9ralph@flash.net> >Subject: RE: RV9-List: Engine decision time ... > >--> RV9-List message posted by: "Ralph Cloud" <rv9ralph@flash.net> > >I'll throw my $.02 in. On the Superior Air Parts XP 360 website they >have a position paper on why you can use "their" derated XP-360 in a >Vans RV-9. Why? They want you to buy their engine. Just remember - >higher HP = higher GPH!! > >Personally, I will use a IO-320 clone. Also, in a RVator from several >issues back, Vans addressed the effect on Vne of carrying too much HP to >higher altitudes. > >The fuse, verticle stabilizer and rudder are identical between the 7 & 9 >series. The cracks were from the rivets on the stiffners on the rudder. >I have seen these same cracks on a RV-4 rudder, however on the 4 the >cracks were on the hinge end of the stiffners. My personal, uneducated >theory on the origin of the cracks is from work hardening the metal from >over "smacking" the dimpler on the skins and over driving the rivets on >the stiffners. > >Ralph >RV9A wings, fuse in box >Livermore, CA




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv9-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV9-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv9-list
  • Browse RV9-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv9-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --