Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 04:07 PM - IO-320 (Rafael)
2. 04:45 PM - Re: IO-320 (John Morgensen)
3. 05:41 PM - Brake pedal position: (McCarty)
4. 05:41 PM - Re: IO-320 ()
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I'm considering building an RV9-A. One of the factors I'm weighing is the
availability of an injected engine. Has anyone have any information on an
IO-320 installation? Van's web site only calls for the O-320.
Thanks and regards,
Rafael
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I am building a 9A with an IO-320. The Superior cold induction sump
issue is supposed to be resolved "real soon now". In the meantime, my
engine is on order. I have been offered the chance to change the
configuration but I can still afford to wait. Talking to Van's
engineers, I will end up using the same cowl as the -7A angle valve
IO-360 without the "snout" under the chin. The forward facing servo will
be fed air from the left "nostril" instead. It's a little hard to see
because of the prop blur, but the red RV on Van's main page has a smooth
chin. If you follow the link to the RV-8/8A, the 3-view drawings show an
8 with a snout and an 8A with a smooth chin.
The vertical servo in place of a traditional carburetor would be a much
easier installation. It would look just like an O-320 and use the same
cowl, intake, etc. The biggest difference would be the fuel boost pump.
Hope this helps,
John Morgensen
Rafael wrote:
> Im considering building an RV9-A. One of the factors Im weighing is
> the availability of an injected engine. Has anyone have any information
> on an IO-320 installation? Vans web site only calls for the O-320.
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
>
>
> Rafael
>
> *
>
>
> *
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Brake pedal position: |
In attempting to determine the proper position to place the dual system brake pedals
for my 9-A I have found that it will be necessary to depress two of the
master cylinders in order to have the bolt holes line up with the designated tabs
that are welded to the brake pedals. Having never set up a hydralic system
before I have no experience to draw on and am not sure what I am doing. Could
someone with more experience advise me before I make a mistake and drill a hole
in the wrong place?
Mac
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I recently had an interesting chat with Larry
Vetterman who builds the exhaust systems for Van's.
He has an RV-7A with an IO-0-360 with the smooth cowl
without the fish mouth lower induction opening.
It his opinion that if using an injected engine the
best choice is an updraft induction sump and use the
cowling with the forward facing fish mouth. He said
his test indicates that gives 1 1/2 more inches of
manifold pressure.
You might want to give him a call.
Dennis Thomas
--- John Morgensen <john@morgensen.com> wrote:
> <john@morgensen.com>
>
> I am building a 9A with an IO-320. The Superior cold
> induction sump
> issue is supposed to be resolved "real soon now". In
> the meantime, my
> engine is on order. I have been offered the chance
> to change the
> configuration but I can still afford to wait.
> Talking to Van's
> engineers, I will end up using the same cowl as the
> -7A angle valve
> IO-360 without the "snout" under the chin. The
> forward facing servo will
> be fed air from the left "nostril" instead. It's a
> little hard to see
> because of the prop blur, but the red RV on Van's
> main page has a smooth
> chin. If you follow the link to the RV-8/8A, the
> 3-view drawings show an
> 8 with a snout and an 8A with a smooth chin.
>
> The vertical servo in place of a traditional
> carburetor would be a much
> easier installation. It would look just like an
> O-320 and use the same
> cowl, intake, etc. The biggest difference would be
> the fuel boost pump.
>
> Hope this helps,
> John Morgensen
>
>
> Rafael wrote:
> > Im considering building an RV9-A. One of the
> factors Im weighing is
> > the availability of an injected engine. Has
> anyone have any information
> > on an IO-320 installation? Vans web site only
> calls for the O-320.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Rafael
> >
> > *
> >
> >
> > *
>
>
>
>
>
> browse
> Subscriptions page,
> FAQ,
> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV9-List
>
> Web Forums!
>
>
>
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|