Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 02:12 PM - Sea/Float Plane empty vs. gross weight considerations (Chris In Madison)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Sea/Float Plane empty vs. gross weight considerations |
Afternoon all,
While at Oshkosh, I spoke with Paul Seehafer regarding the suitability of the LMA
Super Cub replica as a sea/float plane. We briefly discussed the empty weight
versus the gross weight rating of the aircraft and whether or not the useful
load would be grossly affected while on floats. One of the phrases Paul used
was the ability of the airplane to "lift its own weight" being a reasonable
criteria for an aircraft's suitability for life on floats.
The LMA Super Cub replica is specified by the manufacturer as about 690 lbs. empty
with an 1100 lb. gross weight when using a Rotax 582, and the use of a larger
engine will obviously make the airplane weigh more. Builders using larger
Continental engines and the like are using stronger landing gear and some other
updates to bring the gross weight up a bit, but the typical GW is about 1200
lbs. for the ones I'm familiar with, which seems to be along similar lines as
a stock J-3. But I'm not sure what the empty weight of a stock J-3 is. I did
see at least three J-3s on floats while at OSH, but I didn't see how many people
climbed out of them.
What are some of the criteria I should be considering when determining whether
or not an airplane will work well on floats or not? Any experiences to share
or online resources to reference?
Thanks and best regards,
Chris
--------
Chris Owens
Waunakee, WI
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=126447#126447
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|