Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 04:58 AM - Re: Ram Performance - new intake manifolds (Phil Raker)
2. 05:10 PM - Re: Ram Performance - new intake manifolds (Andrew SanClemente)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Ram Performance - new intake manifolds |
--> Stratus-List message posted by: Phil Raker <phadr1@yahoo.com>
ZAC has said for years that the HD/HDS airfoil will not go significantly faster
than what we/they have been seeing. It's a high-lift (and high-drag) airfoil.
What you say, Bill, may be true for the XL with its thinner and lower-drag
airfoil. I don't know, but that makes sense. With the HD/HDS, more power will
get you a faster climb, but not enough more speed to justify the increase in
cost/weight/fuel burned. You are completely correct about fuel burn rates;
they're usually proportional to power generated.
Phil Raker N556P HDS/Stratus ~85% completed
--> Stratus-List message posted by: "Bill Morelli" <billvt@together.net>
>
> If you can get that much more horse power and the same weight,
> it should not be a problem for a 601 and would make it significantly faster.
> Would use a good deal more fuel though.
__________________________________
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Ram Performance - new intake manifolds |
--> Stratus-List message posted by: Andrew SanClemente <ansancle@townisp.com>
Talk to Ron at Ram, he was telling me about one if his engines in a
Europa I believe where they had it down to burning 2.5 gallons per
hour at cruise - and I believe it was a 150 horse. He's doing some
pretty incredible stuff with these engines.
- A
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:37:32 -0400, Bill Morelli wrote:
>--> Stratus-List message posted by: "Bill Morelli"
><billvt@together.net>
>
>I believe that RAM is producing an EA-81 with 130 to 140 hp with
>little if any increase in weight. If you can get that much more
>horse power and the same weight, it should not be a problem for a
>601 and would make it significantly faster. Would use a good deal
>more fuel though.
>
>Just my opinion.
>
>Regards,
>Bill
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|