Stratus-List Digest Archive

Mon 08/06/07


Total Messages Posted: 8



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 09:27 AM - in-flight adjustable props (LarryMcFarland)
     2. 09:27 AM - in-flight adjustable props (LarryMcFarland)
     3. 09:46 AM - Re: in-flight adjustable props (Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis))
     4. 01:21 PM - Re: in-flight adjustable props (LarryMcFarland)
     5. 01:39 PM - Re: in-flight adjustable props (Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis))
     6. 03:18 PM - Re: in-flight adjustable props (LarryMcFarland)
     7. 03:30 PM - Re: in-flight adjustable props (Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis))
     8. 07:13 PM - Re: in-flight adjustable props (Don Walker)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:27:15 AM PST US
    From: LarryMcFarland <larry@macsmachine.com>
    Subject: in-flight adjustable props
    Hi guys, Is anyone flying a Stratus Subaru with an in-flight adjustable prop with any success? I understand that a re-drive may have some adverse effect on these things, but I'd still like to know if it's doable, practical, safe or not. Warp Drive has an in-flight adjustable in development, but they've made no further comments. Larry McFarland


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:27:39 AM PST US
    From: LarryMcFarland <larry@macsmachine.com>
    Subject: in-flight adjustable props
    Hi guys, Is anyone flying a Stratus Subaru with an in-flight adjustable prop with any success? I understand that a re-drive may have some adverse effect on these things, but I'd still like to know if it's doable, practical, safe or not. Warp Drive has an in-flight adjustable in development, but they've made no further comments. Larry McFarland


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:46:28 AM PST US
    Subject: in-flight adjustable props
    From: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com>
    I have no data Larry but I would doubt if the cost is worth it for the performance gains you would see in a Zodiac. If you have a ground adjustable prop you can do is to ground adjust pitch and measure your cruise speed increase vs fuel burn data. I.e set your cruise up at say 5000 ft, pull your fuel burn down to 5GPH and see what speed you get over a 3 way course using one of the online calculators. Do this for various pitches and see what benefit you will get form being able to increase the pitch in flight. My personal guess is that it won't be worth it an a draggy airplane like the Zodiac. Now in the RV...its a different story..:) Frank 601HDS modified Stratus 400 hours RV 7a IO360 Constant speed 200 hours -----Original Message----- From: owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of LarryMcFarland Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 9:25 AM Subject: Stratus-List: in-flight adjustable props --> <larry@macsmachine.com> Hi guys, Is anyone flying a Stratus Subaru with an in-flight adjustable prop with any success? I understand that a re-drive may have some adverse effect on these things, but I'd still like to know if it's doable, practical, safe or not. Warp Drive has an in-flight adjustable in development, but they've made no further comments. Larry McFarland


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:21:20 PM PST US
    From: LarryMcFarland <larry@macsmachine.com>
    Subject: Re: in-flight adjustable props
    Hi Frank, I agree with you entirely, but the reason I'd like an adjustable is for the low end. I fly with my pitch at 17-degrees and the performance is very acceptable, but getting out of short grass strips with long corn is sometimes a concern. Being able to put it into low gear would be the best value to me. The high end is not at issue, but if I could adjust to 18 or 19-degrees, it might be interesting to know where the prop begins to labor. My worry is that some of these in-flight adjustable props really don't like re-drive harmonics. Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis) wrote: > > I have no data Larry but I would doubt if the cost is worth it for the > performance gains you would see in a Zodiac. > > If you have a ground adjustable prop you can do is to ground adjust > pitch and measure your cruise speed increase vs fuel burn data. > > I.e set your cruise up at say 5000 ft, pull your fuel burn down to 5GPH > and see what speed you get over a 3 way course using one of the online > calculators. > > Do this for various pitches and see what benefit you will get form being > able to increase the pitch in flight. > > My personal guess is that it won't be worth it an a draggy airplane like > the Zodiac. > > Now in the RV...its a different story..:) > > Frank > > 601HDS modified Stratus 400 hours > RV 7a IO360 Constant speed 200 hours > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > LarryMcFarland > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 9:25 AM > To: zenith-list; stratus-list > Subject: Stratus-List: in-flight adjustable props > > --> <larry@macsmachine.com> > > Hi guys, > Is anyone flying a Stratus Subaru with an in-flight adjustable prop with > any success? > I understand that a re-drive may have some adverse effect on these > things, but I'd still like to know if it's doable, practical, safe or > not. > > Warp Drive has an in-flight adjustable in development, but they've made > no further comments. > > Larry McFarland > > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:39:19 PM PST US
    Subject: in-flight adjustable props
    From: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com>
    Hey Larry, I did try 14 deg (if I remember correctly) and I did not gain anything in terms of cruise performance above that pitch. This would make sense for a relatively draggy airplane, i.e for any particular pitch the relative angle of attack reduces with increases in speed and prop efficiency decreases. Thus as speed goes up you want to increase pitch. For an airplane that only cruises at 100mph anyway then further increases in pitch are unlikely to help much...except that RPM will reduce which may aid a bit. Anyway, you could still do the same experiment and see how much your short field performance increases and what it does to your cruise speed as you reduce pitch. There is a bit of getting used to an engine that is turning faster than your used to in cruise but that's a just a "head thing"..:) Certainly 11 degrees it makes the HDS a rocket ship off the ground, but then your stuck in low gear. How short is your short strip? I was working out of 1600ft grass with big trees at the end of a displaced threashold and 14 deg with the same engine made it quite comfortable. If I were in your shoes I would avoid the variable pitch prop...As you said a few unkowns that would make me nervous. Of course I'm a little spoiled right now...On a cool morning I see 2600FPM solo at 250MSL...Woohoo! Frank -----Original Message----- From: owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of LarryMcFarland Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 1:21 PM Subject: Re: Stratus-List: in-flight adjustable props --> <larry@macsmachine.com> Hi Frank, I agree with you entirely, but the reason I'd like an adjustable is for the low end. I fly with my pitch at 17-degrees and the performance is very acceptable, but getting out of short grass strips with long corn is sometimes a concern. Being able to put it into low gear would be the best value to me. The high end is not at issue, but if I could adjust to 18 or 19-degrees, it might be interesting to know where the prop begins to labor. My worry is that some of these in-flight adjustable props really don't like re-drive harmonics. Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis) wrote: > --> <frank.hinde@hp.com> > > I have no data Larry but I would doubt if the cost is worth it for the > performance gains you would see in a Zodiac. > > If you have a ground adjustable prop you can do is to ground adjust > pitch and measure your cruise speed increase vs fuel burn data. > > I.e set your cruise up at say 5000 ft, pull your fuel burn down to > 5GPH and see what speed you get over a 3 way course using one of the > online calculators. > > Do this for various pitches and see what benefit you will get form > being able to increase the pitch in flight. > > My personal guess is that it won't be worth it an a draggy airplane > like the Zodiac. > > Now in the RV...its a different story..:) > > Frank > > 601HDS modified Stratus 400 hours > RV 7a IO360 Constant speed 200 hours > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > LarryMcFarland > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 9:25 AM > To: zenith-list; stratus-list > Subject: Stratus-List: in-flight adjustable props > > --> <larry@macsmachine.com> > > Hi guys, > Is anyone flying a Stratus Subaru with an in-flight adjustable prop > with any success? > I understand that a re-drive may have some adverse effect on these > things, but I'd still like to know if it's doable, practical, safe or > not. > > Warp Drive has an in-flight adjustable in development, but they've > made no further comments. > > Larry McFarland > > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:18:08 PM PST US
    From: LarryMcFarland <larry@macsmachine.com>
    Subject: Re: in-flight adjustable props
    Yes Frank, Flying at 15-degrees seemed much like being in a slingshot. After the climb out, the rpm and airspeed stayed pretty much the same. I eventually got everything faired in nicely and worked up to 17-degrees. Lightly loaded at 3500 feet the top end is 133 mph. Cruise is 120 and it sounds better with that pitch and burns 4 gph. Go faster and it burns 5. The flying I do is more about access than destination and there are two strips that are called "1500 ft" with tall corn each end. Mowing is questionable. I get off concrete in 800 ft with a full header tank, but not with a passenger. Does make one feel a little nervous trying to drop over the corn and then worry about running into it at the other end on takeoff. I don't like flying the HDS at less than 17-degrees so the in-flight adjustable is an intriguing consideration for shorter fields. The next project will likely be a gyro. Some are shortening lift off and using higher inertia blades to round out the flight envelope. I attended Mentone this past week for the rotary aircraft gathering and it was interesting. Didn't bother to go to Oshkosh this year because innovation has essentially been replaced by sales hype. Thanks, Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis) wrote: > > Hey Larry, > > I did try 14 deg (if I remember correctly) and I did not gain anything > in terms of cruise performance above that pitch. This would make sense > for a relatively draggy airplane, i.e for any particular pitch the > relative angle of attack reduces with increases in speed and prop > efficiency decreases. Thus as speed goes up you want to increase pitch. > > For an airplane that only cruises at 100mph anyway then further > increases in pitch are unlikely to help much...except that RPM will > reduce which may aid a bit. > > Anyway, you could still do the same experiment and see how much your > short field performance increases and what it does to your cruise speed > as you reduce pitch. > > There is a bit of getting used to an engine that is turning faster than > your used to in cruise but that's a just a "head thing"..:) > > Certainly 11 degrees it makes the HDS a rocket ship off the ground, but > then your stuck in low gear. > > How short is your short strip? > > I was working out of 1600ft grass with big trees at the end of a > displaced threashold and 14 deg with the same engine made it quite > comfortable. > > If I were in your shoes I would avoid the variable pitch prop...As you > said a few unkowns that would make me nervous. > > Of course I'm a little spoiled right now...On a cool morning I see > 2600FPM solo at 250MSL...Woohoo! > > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > LarryMcFarland > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 1:21 PM > To: stratus-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Stratus-List: in-flight adjustable props > > --> <larry@macsmachine.com> > > Hi Frank, > I agree with you entirely, but the reason I'd like an adjustable is for > the low end. I fly with my pitch at 17-degrees and the performance is > very acceptable, but getting out of short grass strips with long corn is > sometimes a concern. Being able to put it into low gear would be the > best value to me. The high end is not at issue, but if I could adjust > to 18 or 19-degrees, it might be interesting to know where the prop > begins to labor. My worry is that some of these in-flight adjustable > props really don't like re-drive harmonics. > > Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com > > Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis) wrote: > >> --> <frank.hinde@hp.com> >> >> I have no data Larry but I would doubt if the cost is worth it for the >> > > >> performance gains you would see in a Zodiac. >> >> If you have a ground adjustable prop you can do is to ground adjust >> pitch and measure your cruise speed increase vs fuel burn data. >> >> I.e set your cruise up at say 5000 ft, pull your fuel burn down to >> 5GPH and see what speed you get over a 3 way course using one of the >> online calculators. >> >> Do this for various pitches and see what benefit you will get form >> being able to increase the pitch in flight. >> >> My personal guess is that it won't be worth it an a draggy airplane >> like the Zodiac. >> >> Now in the RV...its a different story..:) >> >> Frank >> >> 601HDS modified Stratus 400 hours >> RV 7a IO360 Constant speed 200 hours >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com >> [mailto:owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of >> LarryMcFarland >> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 9:25 AM >> To: zenith-list; stratus-list >> Subject: Stratus-List: in-flight adjustable props >> >> --> <larry@macsmachine.com> >> >> Hi guys, >> Is anyone flying a Stratus Subaru with an in-flight adjustable prop >> with any success? >> I understand that a re-drive may have some adverse effect on these >> things, but I'd still like to know if it's doable, practical, safe or >> not. >> >> Warp Drive has an in-flight adjustable in development, but they've >> made no further comments. >> >> Larry McFarland >> >> >> >>


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:30:55 PM PST US
    Subject: in-flight adjustable props
    From: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com>
    Sounds like you got some significant drag reduction to work on the HDS there Larry. Good for you. I was tempted to start doing this work but realised my priorities had a changed a bit from when I built the HDS...I.e IFR, aerobatics and fast cross country. Would have been a fun project though. Cheers Frank -----Original Message----- From: owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of LarryMcFarland Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 3:18 PM Subject: Re: Stratus-List: in-flight adjustable props --> <larry@macsmachine.com> Yes Frank, Flying at 15-degrees seemed much like being in a slingshot. After the climb out, the rpm and airspeed stayed pretty much the same. I eventually got everything faired in nicely and worked up to 17-degrees. Lightly loaded at 3500 feet the top end is 133 mph. Cruise is 120 and it sounds better with that pitch and burns 4 gph. Go faster and it burns 5. The flying I do is more about access than destination and there are two strips that are called "1500 ft" with tall corn each end. Mowing is questionable.


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:13:59 PM PST US
    From: Don Walker <d3dw@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: in-flight adjustable props
    When I started flying the HDS in 1999, I found very quickly that keeping the bird light is the key. It didn't take long to see that the "published" or popular prop setting weren't for me. Experiementing from the gitgo, I set it at 17 and found no tendency to feel loaded at all. that let me climb at 1800 fpm initial clomg with an all out speed of 125. that was with a 612 lb empty weight and loaded light...150 lb. pilot. With this I was off the ground and climbing like heck after 450Ft. take off roll. No problem getting off anywhere. Reiner told me my Stratus was putting out 113 hp. Of course I wrung that engine out pretty quickly with the valve guide problems. don Yes Frank, Flying at 15-degrees seemed much like being in a slingshot. After the climb out, the rpm and airspeed stayed pretty much the same. I eventually got everything faired in nicely and worked up to 17-degrees. Lightly loaded at 3500 feet the top end is 133 mph. Cruise is 120 and it sounds better with that pitch and burns 4 gph. Go faster and it burns 5. The flying I do is more about access than destination and there are two strips that are called "1500 ft" with tall corn each end. Mowing is questionable. I get off concrete in 800 ft with a full header tank, but not with a passenger. Does make one feel a little nervous trying to drop over the corn and then worry about running into it at the other end on takeoff. I don't like flying the HDS at less than 17-degrees so the in-flight adjustable is an intriguing consideration for shorter fields. The next project will likely be a gyro. Some are shortening lift off and using higher inertia blades to round out the flight envelope. I attended Mentone this past week for the rotary aircraft gathering and it was interesting. Didn't bother to go to Oshkosh this year because innovation has essentially been replaced by sales hype. Thanks, Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis) wrote: > > Hey Larry, > > I did try 14 deg (if I remember correctly) and I did not gain anything > in terms of cruise performance above that pitch. This would make sense > for a relatively draggy airplane, i.e for any particular pitch the > relative angle of attack reduces with increases in speed and prop > efficiency decreases. Thus as speed goes up you want to increase pitch. > > For an airplane that only cruises at 100mph anyway then further > increases in pitch are unlikely to help much...except that RPM will > reduce which may aid a bit. > > Anyway, you could still do the same experiment and see how much your > short field performance increases and what it does to your cruise speed > as you reduce pitch. > > There is a bit of getting used to an engine that is turning faster than > your used to in cruise but that's a just a "head thing"..:) > > Certainly 11 degrees it makes the HDS a rocket ship off the ground, but > then your stuck in low gear. > > How short is your short strip? > > I was working out of 1600ft grass with big trees at the end of a > displaced threashold and 14 deg with the same engine made it quite > comfortable. > > If I were in your shoes I would avoid the variable pitch prop...As you > said a few unkowns that would make me nervous. > > Of course I'm a little spoiled right now...On a cool morning I see > 2600FPM solo at 250MSL...Woohoo! > > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > LarryMcFarland > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 1:21 PM > To: stratus-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Stratus-List: in-flight adjustable props > > --> > > Hi Frank, > I agree with you entirely, but the reason I'd like an adjustable is for > the low end. I fly with my pitch at 17-degrees and the performance is > very acceptable, but getting out of short grass strips with long corn is > sometimes a concern. Being able to put it into low gear would be the > best value to me. The high end is not at issue, but if I could adjust > to 18 or 19-degrees, it might be interesting to know where the prop > begins to labor. My worry is that some of these in-flight adjustable > props really don't like re-drive harmonics. > > Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com > > Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis) wrote: > >> --> >> >> I have no data Larry but I would doubt if the cost is worth it for the >> > > >> performance gains you would see in a Zodiac. >> >> If you have a ground adjustable prop you can do is to ground adjust >> pitch and measure your cruise speed increase vs fuel burn data. >> >> I.e set your cruise up at say 5000 ft, pull your fuel burn down to >> 5GPH and see what speed you get over a 3 way course using one of the >> online calculators. >> >> Do this for various pitches and see what benefit you will get form >> being able to increase the pitch in flight. >> >> My personal guess is that it won't be worth it an a draggy airplane >> like the Zodiac. >> >> Now in the RV...its a different story..:) >> >> Frank >> >> 601HDS modified Stratus 400 hours >> RV 7a IO360 Constant speed 200 hours >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com >> [mailto:owner-stratus-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of >> LarryMcFarland >> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 9:25 AM >> To: zenith-list; stratus-list >> Subject: Stratus-List: in-flight adjustable props >> >> --> >> >> Hi guys, >> Is anyone flying a Stratus Subaru with an in-flight adjustable prop >> with any success? >> I understand that a re-drive may have some adverse effect on these >> things, but I'd still like to know if it's doable, practical, safe or >> not. >> >> Warp Drive has an in-flight adjustable in development, but they've >> made no further comments. >> >> Larry McFarland >> >> >> >>




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   stratus-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Stratus-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/stratus-list
  • Browse Stratus-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/stratus-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --