Tailwind-List Digest Archive

Tue 07/20/04


Total Messages Posted: 10



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:46 AM - Re: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and some related fuel questions (cgalley)
     2. 07:19 AM - Re: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and some related fuel questions (Rick)
     3. 07:27 AM - Re: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and som... (NorthernTailwind@aol.com)
     4. 07:40 AM - Re: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden (Fred Weaver)
     5. 09:02 AM - Re: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and some related fuel questions (cgalley)
     6. 11:27 AM - Re: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and som... (Jack Steele)
     7. 07:13 PM - Re: [TailwindForum] (unknown) (flamini2)
     8. 09:10 PM - Re: Re: [TailwindForum] (unknown) (Dave Conrad)
     9. 10:00 PM - Re: Re: [TailwindForum] (unknown) (flamini2)
    10. 11:26 PM - Re: Therapy (red)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:46:02 AM PST US
    From: "cgalley" <cgalley@qcbc.org>
    Subject: Re: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight
    and some related fuel questions All 1948 Cessna 170s had a fuel pump on the C-145. ----- Original Message ----- From: Rick To: tailwind-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:20 PM Subject: Re: Tailwind-List: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and some related fuel questions Rogers: I don't know of any O300 powered Tailwinds that have experienced the exact problems you tell us of. Few, if any O300 powered anythings are equipped with a fuel pump. By far most of these engines would have been on C172s, which had no fuel pump. I doubt anyone on this group can put their finger on a Tailwind that has had an O300 with a fuel pump, although there are one or two members who are obsessed with such details that may know of one. The wooden prop provides far less flywheel than a metal one, and will therefore stop windmilling at a higher speed. Likely the pilot slowed down when he had difficulty, stopping the prop. It is possible for an aircooled engine to seize when overheated, then unseize when cool. This will likely be a piston to cylinder wall seizure and there will be evidence of this on the cylinder walls. If the crank main bearings or big end connecting rod bearings seized, the engine will likely stay seized. We hate to hear of a Tailwind crashing, but we're glad the pilot escaped serious injury. Rick N241SW ----- Original Message ----- From: Rogers To: tailwind-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:32 PM Subject: Tailwind-List: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and some related fuel questions Fellow Listers On its maiden flight, a Canadian-registered tricycle T-wind experienced an engine stoppage shortly after take off and ended up on its back after a forced landing in a soybean field. Test pilot had only minor scratches, but the plane is close to being a write-off. Fuselage is in fairly good shape, and one wing seems totally undamaged. Nose gear broke off and caused major damage to the other wing. The dyna-focal engine mount hardly deformed at all and in fact broke the attachment points off the motor case. The owner is in the process of tearing down the engine but is already wondering if fuel starvation may have played a role. The engine ran perfectly throughout the take-off and only experienced problems as the test pilot pulled it into a steep climb. He claims the engine ran rough for a few seconds and then stopped. The wooden prop stopped windmilling almost immediately. Re-starting apparently involved taking both hands off the stick--which he decided not to do at 150 feet off the runway. The pre-flight dipped fuel reading indicated about 3/4 full tank. I don't know how much head there was between the fuel tank outlet and carb inlet. Measured fuel flow with both the tail and the mains on the ground (don't know what angle that represents) was 2 1/2 times maximum full throttle fuel consumption. Questions: Has anyone on the list experienced similar problems with the 0-300? Is anyone flying a T-wind with the 0-300 WITHOUT fuel pump assist? Does it seem likely that a wooden prop would stop windmilling that quickly with the plane going 95 mph in a nose-high attitude? The engine turned over freely post-crash. If the engine did seize in flight, is it likely that it would unseize after the forced landing? Any feedback greatly appreciated. Roger My Inbox is protected by SPAMfighter 10985 spam mails have been blocked so far. Download free SPAMfighter today!


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:19:00 AM PST US
    From: "Rick" <rcaviate@infionline.net>
    Subject: Re: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight
    and some related fuel questions Yes, but that wasn't an O300. ----- Original Message ----- From: cgalley To: tailwind-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 7:45 AM Subject: Re: Tailwind-List: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and some related fuel questions All 1948 Cessna 170s had a fuel pump on the C-145. ----- Original Message ----- From: Rick To: tailwind-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:20 PM Subject: Re: Tailwind-List: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and some related fuel questions Rogers: I don't know of any O300 powered Tailwinds that have experienced the exact problems you tell us of. Few, if any O300 powered anythings are equipped with a fuel pump. By far most of these engines would have been on C172s, which had no fuel pump. I doubt anyone on this group can put their finger on a Tailwind that has had an O300 with a fuel pump, although there are one or two members who are obsessed with such details that may know of one. The wooden prop provides far less flywheel than a metal one, and will therefore stop windmilling at a higher speed. Likely the pilot slowed down when he had difficulty, stopping the prop. It is possible for an aircooled engine to seize when overheated, then unseize when cool. This will likely be a piston to cylinder wall seizure and there will be evidence of this on the cylinder walls. If the crank main bearings or big end connecting rod bearings seized, the engine will likely stay seized. We hate to hear of a Tailwind crashing, but we're glad the pilot escaped serious injury. Rick N241SW ----- Original Message ----- From: Rogers To: tailwind-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:32 PM Subject: Tailwind-List: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and some related fuel questions Fellow Listers On its maiden flight, a Canadian-registered tricycle T-wind experienced an engine stoppage shortly after take off and ended up on its back after a forced landing in a soybean field. Test pilot had only minor scratches, but the plane is close to being a write-off. Fuselage is in fairly good shape, and one wing seems totally undamaged. Nose gear broke off and caused major damage to the other wing. The dyna-focal engine mount hardly deformed at all and in fact broke the attachment points off the motor case. The owner is in the process of tearing down the engine but is already wondering if fuel starvation may have played a role. The engine ran perfectly throughout the take-off and only experienced problems as the test pilot pulled it into a steep climb. He claims the engine ran rough for a few seconds and then stopped. The wooden prop stopped windmilling almost immediately. Re-starting apparently involved taking both hands off the stick--which he decided not to do at 150 feet off the runway. The pre-flight dipped fuel reading indicated about 3/4 full tank. I don't know how much head there was between the fuel tank outlet and carb inlet. Measured fuel flow with both the tail and the mains on the ground (don't know what angle that represents) was 2 1/2 times maximum full throttle fuel consumption. Questions: Has anyone on the list experienced similar problems with the 0-300? Is anyone flying a T-wind with the 0-300 WITHOUT fuel pump assist? Does it seem likely that a wooden prop would stop windmilling that quickly with the plane going 95 mph in a nose-high attitude? The engine turned over freely post-crash. If the engine did seize in flight, is it likely that it would unseize after the forced landing? Any feedback greatly appreciated. Roger My Inbox is protected by SPAMfighter 10985 spam mails have been blocked so far. Download free SPAMfighter today!


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:27:15 AM PST US
    From: NorthernTailwind@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight
    and som... Roger - A Canadian built plane must prove a fuel flow of 30 US gallons per hour, or 25 Imperial gallons, in climb attitude. This is not difficult to do with a 3/8 fuel line and gravity fed. Without this test a builder will not receive a flight permit. A wooden propeller will stop windmilling when the engine quits, even at 150 knots, at least mine did. I guess if the compression is the pits it might go around. At my airport, an RV-6 builder lost his investment on first flight in much the same way. When all the dust cleared it turned out the fuel selector was not in the ON indent, it was between on and off. Being a Canadian I am interested in where this happened? Earl Trimble


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:40:41 AM PST US
    From: Fred Weaver <mytyweav@earthlink.net>
    flight and some related fuel questions
    Subject: Re: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden
    flight and some related fuel questions DNA: do not archive Its-Bogus: do not forward to list --- MIME Errors --- A message with no text/plain section was received. The entire body of the message was removed. Please resend the email using plaintext formatting. NOTE! This error can also occur when the poster of the message has a specific type of computer virus. This virus WAS NOT forwarded on to the List. The poster should be informed of the potential problem with their system as soon as possible. --- MIME Errors ---


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:02:29 AM PST US
    From: "cgalley" <cgalley@qcbc.org>
    Subject: Re: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight
    and some related fuel questions Only difference is the crank in the O-300 has counterweights, Every thing else is the same. Many C-145 have had the crank changed. It is mostly just an ID that changed. Same Cert. E-253 Certification basis CAR 13 Type Certificate No. 253 issued for C145-2 December 59 1947; C145-2H added April 1, 1949; C145-2HP added January 27, 1953; O-300-A added May 12, 1954; O-300-B added September 27, 1955; O-300-C added February 24, 1959; O-300-D added June 1, 1960; O-300-E added April 3, 1963 So that all 170 before may 12, 1954 had to have C-145 301 cu in after that date the probably are O-300 of 301 cu in. As I said before it is just mostly a difference in Name. From: Rick To: tailwind-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:17 AM Subject: Re: Tailwind-List: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and some related fuel questions Yes, but that wasn't an O300. ----- Original Message ----- From: cgalley To: tailwind-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 7:45 AM Subject: Re: Tailwind-List: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and some related fuel questions All 1948 Cessna 170s had a fuel pump on the C-145. ----- Original Message ----- From: Rick To: tailwind-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:20 PM Subject: Re: Tailwind-List: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and some related fuel questions Rogers: I don't know of any O300 powered Tailwinds that have experienced the exact problems you tell us of. Few, if any O300 powered anythings are equipped with a fuel pump. By far most of these engines would have been on C172s, which had no fuel pump. I doubt anyone on this group can put their finger on a Tailwind that has had an O300 with a fuel pump, although there are one or two members who are obsessed with such details that may know of one. The wooden prop provides far less flywheel than a metal one, and will therefore stop windmilling at a higher speed. Likely the pilot slowed down when he had difficulty, stopping the prop. It is possible for an aircooled engine to seize when overheated, then unseize when cool. This will likely be a piston to cylinder wall seizure and there will be evidence of this on the cylinder walls. If the crank main bearings or big end connecting rod bearings seized, the engine will likely stay seized. We hate to hear of a Tailwind crashing, but we're glad the pilot escaped serious injury. Rick N241SW ----- Original Message ----- From: Rogers To: tailwind-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:32 PM Subject: Tailwind-List: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and some related fuel questions Fellow Listers On its maiden flight, a Canadian-registered tricycle T-wind experienced an engine stoppage shortly after take off and ended up on its back after a forced landing in a soybean field. Test pilot had only minor scratches, but the plane is close to being a write-off. Fuselage is in fairly good shape, and one wing seems totally undamaged. Nose gear broke off and caused major damage to the other wing. The dyna-focal engine mount hardly deformed at all and in fact broke the attachment points off the motor case. The owner is in the process of tearing down the engine but is already wondering if fuel starvation may have played a role. The engine ran perfectly throughout the take-off and only experienced problems as the test pilot pulled it into a steep climb. He claims the engine ran rough for a few seconds and then stopped. The wooden prop stopped windmilling almost immediately. Re-starting apparently involved taking both hands off the stick--which he decided not to do at 150 feet off the runway. The pre-flight dipped fuel reading indicated about 3/4 full tank. I don't know how much head there was between the fuel tank outlet and carb inlet. Measured fuel flow with both the tail and the mains on the ground (don't know what angle that represents) was 2 1/2 times maximum full throttle fuel consumption. Questions: Has anyone on the list experienced similar problems with the 0-300? Is anyone flying a T-wind with the 0-300 WITHOUT fuel pump assist? Does it seem likely that a wooden prop would stop windmilling that quickly with the plane going 95 mph in a nose-high attitude? The engine turned over freely post-crash. If the engine did seize in flight, is it likely that it would unseize after the forced landing? Any feedback greatly appreciated. Roger My Inbox is protected by SPAMfighter 10985 spam mails have been blocked so far. Download free SPAMfighter today!


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:27:32 AM PST US
    From: "Jack Steele" <jcsteele@ripnet.com>
    Subject: Re: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight
    and som... Earl, It happened at Carp Ontario, just outside of Ottawa Jack Steele TW C-FSNY ----- Original Message ----- From: NorthernTailwind@aol.com To: tailwind-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:26 AM Subject: Re: Tailwind-List: Crash landing on Canadian Tailwind's maiden flight and som... Roger - A Canadian built plane must prove a fuel flow of 30 US gallons per hour, or 25 Imperial gallons, in climb attitude. This is not difficult to do with a 3/8 fuel line and gravity fed. Without this test a builder will not receive a flight permit. A wooden propeller will stop windmilling when the engine quits, even at 150 knots, at least mine did. I guess if the compression is the pits it might go around. At my airport, an RV-6 builder lost his investment on first flight in much the same way. When all the dust cleared it turned out the fuel selector was not in the ON indent, it was between on and off. Being a Canadian I am interested in where this happened? Earl Trimble


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:13:49 PM PST US
    From: "flamini2" <flamini2@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: [TailwindForum] (unknown)
    Looks like i will be in Dallas Thurs thru Mon but will catch up with everyone at the Flyin. Here is a photo of my retirement project, a biplane i started 37 years ago when i was 24 years old. Now 61 and better get it done before i am too old to fly it. Dennis Flamini N564DF race #53 Chicago ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim and Donna Clement To: TailwindForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:38 PM Subject: Re: [TailwindForum] (unknown) Pat, Plan is to fly to OSH on Monday. Jim C ----- Original Message ----- From: patmc2002 To: TailwindForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:35 PM Subject: [TailwindForum] (unknown) I know that the tailwind fly-in is on the 24th and 25th. But are there going to be a majority of people there on Monday, and are most of you flying on to Oshkosh on Tuesday?...Pat Mc. The Tailwind Forum group site is: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TailwindForum The Tailwind Forum group site is: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TailwindForum ADVERTISEMENT a.. To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TailwindForum/ b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: TailwindForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:10:30 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: [TailwindForum] (unknown)
    From: Dave Conrad <dconrad@dwave.net>
    Great picture of the boys checking out the project! I have one like that of my boys when they were little in my Hatz. Priceless! Dave Conrad P.S. tonight was the perfect Biplane evening. 85=B0 and muggy. Yes I flew. On Tuesday, July 20, 2004, at 09:13 PM, flamini2 wrote: > Looks like i will be in Dallas Thurs thru Mon but will catch up with > everyone at the Flyin. > Here is a photo of my retirement project, a biplane i started 37 years > ago when i was 24 years old. > Now 61 and better get it done before i am too old to fly it. > Dennis Flamini N564DF race #53 Chicago > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jim and Donna Clement > To: TailwindForum@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:38 PM > Subject: Re: [TailwindForum] (unknown) > > Pat, Plan is to fly to OSH on Monday. Jim C > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: patmc2002 > To: TailwindForum@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:35 PM > Subject: [TailwindForum] (unknown) > > I know that the tailwind fly-in is on the 24th and 25th. But are > there going to be a majority of people there on Monday, and are most > of you flying on to Oshkosh on Tuesday?...Pat Mc. > > > The Tailwind Forum group site is: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TailwindForum > > > The Tailwind Forum group site is: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TailwindForum > > <image.tiff> > > <image.tiff> > > > =95 To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TailwindForum/ > > =95 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > TailwindForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > <sanger 7-19-04ax.jpg><biplane 7-20-04x.jpg>


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:00:28 PM PST US
    From: "flamini2" <flamini2@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: [TailwindForum] (unknown)
    Dave, i also have a photo of my Son in the biplane in 1969, those are his Sons in the photo, he works for United and his Brother is a Southwest pilot. The funny part is when i brought it home from the airport my wife thought i bought another airplane!! The project could set a record for completion time if i live that long. i have a friend who started a Skybolt about the same time and still not done but he paid extra to have the plans airmailed to him so he got a head start on me!! On a positive note 330' of tubing was $128 in 1967. Dennis in Chicago then Dallas then Oshkosh. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Conrad To: tailwind-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 11:10 PM Subject: Re: Tailwind-List: Re: [TailwindForum] (unknown) Great picture of the boys checking out the project! I have one like that of my boys when they were little in my Hatz. Priceless! Dave Conrad P.S. tonight was the perfect Biplane evening. 85=B0 and muggy. Yes I flew. On Tuesday, July 20, 2004, at 09:13 PM, flamini2 wrote: Looks like i will be in Dallas Thurs thru Mon but will catch up with everyone at the Flyin. Here is a photo of my retirement project, a biplane i started 37 years ago when i was 24 years old. Now 61 and better get it done before i am too old to fly it. Dennis Flamini N564DF race #53 Chicago ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim and Donna Clement To: TailwindForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:38 PM Subject: Re: [TailwindForum] (unknown) Pat, Plan is to fly to OSH on Monday. Jim C ----- Original Message ----- From: patmc2002 To: TailwindForum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:35 PM Subject: [TailwindForum] (unknown) I know that the tailwind fly-in is on the 24th and 25th. But are there going to be a majority of people there on Monday, and are most of you flying on to Oshkosh on Tuesday?...Pat Mc. The Tailwind Forum group site is: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TailwindForum The Tailwind Forum group site is: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TailwindForum <image.tiff> <image.tiff> . To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TailwindForum/ . To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: TailwindForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <sanger 7-19-04ax.jpg><biplane 7-20-04x.jpg>


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:26:45 PM PST US
    From: "red" <redswings@reds-headers.com>
    Subject: Re: Therapy
    --> Tailwind-List message posted by: "red" <redswings@reds-headers.com> Rick, That will be cool. Can you go from TN to CA nonstop? Red ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick" <rcaviate@infionline.net> Subject: Re: Tailwind-List: Therapy > --> Tailwind-List message posted by: "Rick" <rcaviate@infionline.net> > > Red: Thanks for your kind words, they are much appreciated. Hope to meet up > with you guys soon, hopefully in a screamin' fast yellow airplane. > Rick > N241SW > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "red" <redswings@reds-headers.com> > To: <tailwind-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 12:28 AM > Subject: Re: Tailwind-List: Therapy > > > > --> Tailwind-List message posted by: "red" <redswings@reds-headers.com> > > > > Sorry that you won't be there Rick, sorrier to hear of the breakup. > > We will see you next year with the O&O. > > Red > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Rick" <rcaviate@infionline.net> > > To: <tailwind-list@matronics.com> > > Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 12:31 PM > > Subject: Re: Tailwind-List: Therapy > > > > > > > --> Tailwind-List message posted by: "Rick" <rcaviate@infionline.net> > > > > > > John: Thanks, not going to be able to make it this year. Ashamed to fly > > the > > > 172 up there and too old to ride the motorcycle that far. > > > Rick > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "john" <frmrjohn@netonecom.net> > > > To: "tailwind" <tailwind-list@matronics.com> > > > Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 1:43 PM > > > Subject: Tailwind-List: Therapy > > > > > > > > > > --> Tailwind-List message posted by: "john" <frmrjohn@netonecom.net> > > > > > > > > Rick; It sounds like with your recent happenstance, that you need > > alittle > > > > Baraboo therapy, hope to see you there. JohnD > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   tailwind-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Tailwind-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/tailwind-list
  • Browse Tailwind-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/tailwind-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --