Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:28 PM - Aileron Bellcranks (Rcaprd@aol.com)
2. 01:59 PM - Re: Aileron Bellcranks (Jim Clement)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Aileron Bellcranks |
Jim C.,
Why did you offset the bellcrank pivots from the slanted supports, for the
aileron controls ?
Why did you increase the angle between the arms from 80=BA to 100=BA ?
I've got the 100=BA bellcranks built, and I'm now setting up where the pivot
goes.
Chuck G.
NX770CG
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Aileron Bellcranks |
--> Tailwind-List message posted by: "Jim Clement" <jclement000@centurytel.net>
To keep the load on the bellcrank close to the slanted truss. The bellcrank
bushing is longer than the plans bushing to eliminate side play.
100 degree worked out better for the linkage although the 80 degree works
ok. 80 was the stock TW but my mods bellcranks are turned upside down
compared to the originals.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Rcaprd@aol.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 3:27 PM
Subject: Tailwind-List: Aileron Bellcranks
Jim C.,
Why did you offset the bellcrank pivots from the slanted supports, for the
aileron controls ?
Why did you increase the angle between the arms from 80 to 100 ?
I've got the 100 bellcranks built, and I'm now setting up where the pivot
goes.
Chuck G.
NX770CG
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|