TeamGrumman-List Digest Archive

Mon 04/19/04


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:26 AM - Re: New Tiger Update (flyv35b)
     2. 06:30 AM - Re: Tiger Update (Les Staples, are you on TeamGrumman?) (flyv35b)
     3. 08:26 AM -  (TeamGrumman@aol.com)
     4. 08:27 AM - Re: New Tiger Update (TeamGrumman@aol.com)
     5. 10:01 PM - Autopilot (Gil Alexander)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:26:47 AM PST US
    From: "flyv35b" <flyv35b@ashcreekwireless.com>
    Subject: Re: New Tiger Update
    --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: "flyv35b" <flyv35b@ashcreekwireless.com> The O-320 H series engine is a totally different design, unlike any of the other O-320 models. You can't really compare much of anything on this engine to others. Cliff A&P/IA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gil Alexander" <gilalex@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: New Tiger Update > --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: Gil Alexander <gilalex@earthlink.net> > > > > > >So, the last two days, I pulled the cowling, baffles, and cylinders. I > >looked very closely at the cam. It looks pretty good. I'm going to > >measure the > >lobes with a dial indicator. Does anyone know the lobe lift? I can't find > >it in the overhaul manual. > > > Gary .. this came from the Sacramento SkyRanch web site... > > "Lycoming do not publish the valve lift figures but I can tell you that it is! > Should be 0.30296\" plus or minus 0.002\" " > > This is for a O-320-H2AD .. my O-320 parts manual doesn't cover this > version, but you might be able to compare part numbers... > > gil A > > > >Gary > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:30:18 AM PST US
    From: "flyv35b" <flyv35b@ashcreekwireless.com>
    Subject: Re: Tiger Update (Les Staples, are you on TeamGrumman?)
    --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: "flyv35b" <flyv35b@ashcreekwireless.com> Gary, where are you taking the measurement, right on the cam lobes themselves? Or are you measuring valve lift? If you are measuring valve lift the rocker arms themselves will result is considerable variation possibly. Cliff ----- Original Message ----- From: <TeamGrumman@aol.com> Subject: TeamGrumman-List: Tiger Update (Les Staples, are you on TeamGrumman?) > --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: TeamGrumman@aol.com > > I pulled the cylinders and pistons. I inspected the cam and lifters > visually. They look remarkably good. The baffle that wraps around #4 was missing. > Consequently, #4 piston and cylinder have been run VERY hot. The pistons > and rings were cooked. At approximately 15 hours in the last 5 years, I'm > lucky. Had this been run a lot longer without the baffle, it could have been a > lot worse. > > I decided to mic the cam using a dial indicator. Here is where things get > interesting. I called Lycon and found that the cam is nominally 0.350 inch > lift. Before I measured the lobe height with a dial indicator, I removed all > the lifter parts, cleaned everything with solvent, dried them, and put them all > back together. > > Now, without the specs for the cam going in, I can't tell you what it was, > but, now, it reads like this. (NOTE: I measured the right side, #'s 1 & 3, > first) > > 1I: 0.350 (So, I felt pretty good about this.) > 1E: 0.3535 (OK, so, it was a little taller, I can live with that.) > > 3I: 0.351 (OK, close enough) > 3E: 0.372 (SAY WHAT? I measured this about a dozen times. I also had > 2 other people verify how I was measuring and duplicated the measurement > between 0.366 and 0.372 > > 2I: 0.355 > 2E: 0.357 > > 4I: 0.355 > 4E: 0.358 to 0.360 > > Now for the weird thing. #1 intake (0.350) and #2 intake (0.355) share > the same lobe. So, even after measuring the two together several times, #1 > was always about 0.005 less. Bent cam? > > Also, #3 intake (0.351) and #4 intake (0.355) share the same lobe. Same > thing. It's weird. Can you just picture two guys who have built numerous > motors and one machinist looking at this and wondering just how in the hell > the measurements can be different from one side to the other on the same cam > lobe? > > Tomorrow I am going to order: > > 1) new Lycoming cylinders and pistons, ported and polished by LyCon > 2) JPI 700 > 3) New lightweight starter, the high torque model, from Les Staples. > 4) plus a few odds and ends from Fletcher. > > Gary > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:26:26 AM PST US
    From: TeamGrumman@aol.com
    --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: TeamGrumman@aol.com In a message dated 04/19/04 06:34:11 AM, flyv35b@ashcreekwireless.com writes: > Gary, where are you taking the measurement, right on the cam lobes > themselves?=A0 Or are you measuring valve lift?=A0 If you are measuring valve > lift the rocker arms themselves will result is considerable variation > possibly. > I'm taking them right at the cam. Like I said, it's all apart. I just have the lifter body and its plunger and cap installed. I bled all the oil out.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:27:16 AM PST US
    From: TeamGrumman@aol.com
    Subject: Re: New Tiger Update
    --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: TeamGrumman@aol.com In a message dated 04/19/04 06:30:59 AM, flyv35b@ashcreekwireless.com writes: > The O-320 H series engine is a totally different design, unlike any of the > other O-320 models.=A0 You can't really compare much of anything on this > engine to others. > this is on my new Tiger


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:01:01 PM PST US
    From: Gil Alexander <gilalex@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Autopilot
    --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: Gil Alexander <gilalex@earthlink.net> Gary.... this was the Century I autopiot that was on E-Bay http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&category=26436&item=2473078947&sspagename=STRK%3AMEBWA%3AIT .. but I'll send you the amount we talked about. What address do you want me to send a check to?? What shape is the Narco NAV 12 1 in? ....and how much do you want for it?? gil in Tucson (Nav 121 for the future RV-6A)




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   teamgrumman-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/TeamGrumman-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/teamgrumman-list
  • Browse TeamGrumman-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/teamgrumman-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --