TeamGrumman-List Digest Archive

Mon 07/19/04


Total Messages Posted: 7



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:25 AM - Re: Details on Gary's new cylinders (TeamGrumman@aol.com)
     2. 12:26 AM - High CHTs (TeamGrumman@aol.com)
     3. 12:38 AM - Re: High CHTs (TeamGrumman@aol.com)
     4. 06:34 AM - Re: High CHTs (Steven Jackson)
     5. 06:36 AM - Re: Details on Gary's new cylinders (Steven Jackson)
     6. 08:45 AM - Re: High CHTs (TeamGrumman@aol.com)
     7. 11:21 PM - Re: High CHTs (Steven Jackson)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:25:20 AM PST US
    From: TeamGrumman@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Details on Gary's new cylinders
    --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: TeamGrumman@aol.com In a message dated 7/18/04 10:37:41 PM, steven.jackson14@adelphia.net writes: > My crank was case-in-point.=A0 Manufactured in 1956, and when it was measured > dimensionally, the journals came out within Lycomings "factory new" > tolerances. > I took an O320 apart that had a bad crank (for how long I don't know, at least for the 20 hours that I flew it before finding metal in the filter) and the crank measured as new. Even the oil pump looked new with no measurable wear.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:26:53 AM PST US
    From: TeamGrumman@aol.com
    Subject: High CHTs
    --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: TeamGrumman@aol.com A lot has been said about the high CHTs in Grummans. If you read GG, you'll read -------------------------------- In a message dated 7/17/04 4:24:00 PM, rblevy@mindspring.com writes: > If you have to do this trick to keep your CHT's under 450F in a climb, you > have significant > cooling problems (see Bob S's remarks about baffling, etc.) that should > be repaired before further flight. > > [Levy] Cool EGT's are generally associated with inefficient combustion. > That means higher fuel consumption and lead fouling.=A0 I recommend > against the use of carb heat as a temperature control except as an > emergency measure to get the plane back on the ground where it can be > repaired. > No where did I propose to fly continuously with the carb heat on. Even with perfect baffles, climbing under full power with high ambient temps (over 80 F) will cause the CHTs to go too high (i.e., over 450F). You can reduce power, go full rich (if not already), and wait for the temps to come down. And wait. However, they will take a while to cool off. Adding carb heat will bring the temps down pretty quickly. Also, adding carb heat will leave the throttle wide open and keep the enrichment system operating. Then, just as quickly, you can reduce the amount of carb heat needed to keep the temps from going down below, say 400 F, during the climb out. You'll notice you can reduce the amount of carb heat needed to keep the temps in check once you level off and accelerate. Yes, if you ran with the carb heat on for extended periods, you will foul the plugs. Plugs are easy to clean. A lot easier than replacing the cylinders. Somewhere on the net, and I don't recall where, I read an article about using a small amount of carb heat to even out the CHT's and EGTs. I have noticed that the EGTs respond quickly to various amounts of carb heat. Fortunately, my EGTs rarely differ by more than 50 degrees F between the cylinders. I've investigated a lot of approaches to reducing high CHTs (particulary in Tigers). Personally, I think every plane should have digital CHT/EGT. You'd be surprised by what you see. On my plane, #2 and #4 are within a few degrees of each other on CHT and within 20 degrees on EGT. #1 was running 15 degrees cooler CHT than either 2 or 4 under almost any condition and #3 was running 15 degrees hotter than either 2 or 4. A piece of aluminum about 2 inches high, placed in front of #1 raised #1 by 15 degrees and lowered #3 by a few degrees. The next step is=20to investigate the effects of removing the very small amounts of slag between the fins.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:38:49 AM PST US
    From: TeamGrumman@aol.com
    Subject: Re: High CHTs
    --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: TeamGrumman@aol.com --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: TeamGrumman@aol.com A lot has been said about the high CHTs in Grummans.=A0=A0 If you read GG, you'll read -------------------------------- In a message dated 7/17/04 4:24:00 PM, rblevy@mindspring.com writes: > [Levy] If you have to do this trick to keep your CHT's under 450F in a climb, you > have significant cooling problems (see Bob S's remarks about baffling, etc.) that should > be repaired before further flight. > > [Levy] Cool EGT's are generally associated with inefficient combustion. > That means higher fuel consumption and lead fouling.A0 I recommend > against the use of carb heat as a temperature control except as an > emergency measure to get the plane back on the ground where it can be > repaired. No where did I propose to fly continuously with the carb heat on.=A0 Even with perfect baffles, climbing under full power with high ambient temps (over 80 F) will cause the CHTs to go too high (i.e., over 450F).=A0=A0 You=20can reduce power, go full rich (if not already), and wait for the temps to come down.=A0=A0 And wait.=A0=A0 However, they will take a while to cool off.=A0=A0 Adding carb heat will bring the temps down pretty quickly.=A0=A0 Also, adding carb heat=20will leave the throttle wide open and keep the enrichment system operating.=A0=20=A0 Then, just as quickly, you can reduce the amount of carb heat needed to keep the temps from going down below, say 400 F, during the climb out.=A0=A0 You'll notice=20you can reduce the amount of carb heat needed to keep the temps in check once you level off and accelerate.=A0 Yes, if you ran with the carb heat on for extended periods, you will foul the plugs.=A0=A0 Plugs are easy to clean.=A0=A0 A lot easier than replacing the cylinders.=A0 Somewhere on the net, and I don't recall where, I read an article about using a small amount of carb heat to even out the CHT's and EGTs.=A0=A0 I have noticed that the EGTs respond quickly to various amounts of carb heat.=A0=A0 Fortunately, my EGTs rarely differ by more than 50 degrees F between the cylinders.=A0 I've investigated a lot of approaches to reducing high CHTs (particulary in Tigers).=A0 Personally, I think every plane should have digital CHT/EGT.=A0 You'd be surprised by what you see. On my plane,=A0=A0 #2 and #4 are within a few degrees of each other on CHT and within 20 degrees on EGT.=A0=A0 #1 was running 15 degrees cooler CHT than either 2 or 4 under almost any condition and #3 was running 15 degrees hotter than either 2 or 4.=A0=A0 A piece of aluminum about 2 inches high, placed in front of #1 raised #1 by 15 degrees and lowered #3 by a few degrees.=A0=A0 The next step is20to investigate the effects of removing the very small amounts of slag between the fins. --------------------------------- I have been able to reduce the CHTs by messaging the baffle (strap) that wraps around the heads on #1 and #3 and by increasing the size of the exit ramps. A hangar neighbor had a LOT of problems with slag between the fins on his new ECI Titan cylinders. The local engine shop has had problems with slag in Superior cylinders. There is no clear leader. What I have found, however, is NO slag in older Lycoming cylinders. (I have a dozen or so really trashed cylinders sitting around. No one wants them.) I'll keep you all posted on what I find in my new Lycoming cylinders. Gary By-the-way, the new cowling is being stiffened up a bit. We made a completely new cowling and vacuum bagged it. Most of it was 4 layers with=20up to 7 layers around the edges. Total weight without hardware was 14 pounds.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:34:09 AM PST US
    From: "Steven Jackson" <steven.jackson14@adelphia.net>
    Subject: High CHTs
    --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: "Steven Jackson" <steven.jackson14@adelphia.net> Gary wrote, "Somewhere on the net, and I don't recall where, I read an article about using a small amount of carb heat to even out the CHT's and EGTs. I have noticed that the EGTs respond quickly to various amounts of carb heat. Fortunately, my EGTs rarely differ by more than 50 degrees F between the cylinders." Wasn't there an article either in Flying or AOPA magazine a couple of months ago written about the guys at GAMI and their research into lean of peak operations? They said something about how LOP is hard to do in a carb aircraft because of the fuel distribution, but that engaging carb heat would allow you to go relatively LOP during cruise, since it will enrichen the mixture in whichever cylinder leans first, and allow you to lean more. Now, I have a question. Carb heat in my plane knocks off about 100 rpm. Why not back off a 100 rpm during the climb instead of engaging the carb heat? Wouldn't the lower rpm setting keep you from developing max CHT in the climb? Steven Jackson N1434R L22 Yucca Valley, CA


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:36:40 AM PST US
    From: "Steven Jackson" <steven.jackson14@adelphia.net>
    Subject: Details on Gary's new cylinders
    --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: "Steven Jackson" <steven.jackson14@adelphia.net> Oh, I guess my reasoning fails then. I guess that's why they NDI the things then. So how is the bottom end "bullet proof" then--and I'm asking, not being a smarty pants... Steven Jackson N1434R L22 Yucca Valley, CA -----Original Message----- From: owner-teamgrumman-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-teamgrumman-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of TeamGrumman@aol.com Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: Details on Gary's new cylinders --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: TeamGrumman@aol.com In a message dated 7/18/04 10:37:41 PM, steven.jackson14@adelphia.net writes: > My crank was case-in-point.=A0 Manufactured in 1956, and when it was measured > dimensionally, the journals came out within Lycomings "factory new" > tolerances. > I took an O320 apart that had a bad crank (for how long I don't know, at least for the 20 hours that I flew it before finding metal in the filter) and the crank measured as new. Even the oil pump looked new with no measurable wear.


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:45:38 AM PST US
    From: TeamGrumman@aol.com
    Subject: Re: High CHTs
    --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: TeamGrumman@aol.com In a message dated 7/19/04 6:34:58 AM, steven.jackson14@adelphia.net writes: > Now, I have a question.=A0 Carb heat in my plane knocks off about 100 rpm. > Why not back off a 100 rpm during the climb instead of engaging the carb > heat?=A0 Wouldn't the lower rpm setting keep you from developing max CHT in > the climb? > well, the enrichment system in the carb would also disengage and it takes a long time to lower the temps just by reducing power. If you have 4 cyl CHT/EGT, go try it. Gary


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:21:11 PM PST US
    From: "Steven Jackson" <steven.jackson14@adelphia.net>
    Subject: High CHTs
    --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: "Steven Jackson" <steven.jackson14@adelphia.net> I'll take your word for it, but once my JPI is installed, I'll do a test... Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-teamgrumman-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-teamgrumman-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of TeamGrumman@aol.com Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: High CHTs --> TeamGrumman-List message posted by: TeamGrumman@aol.com In a message dated 7/19/04 6:34:58 AM, steven.jackson14@adelphia.net writes: > Now, I have a question.=A0 Carb heat in my plane knocks off about 100 rpm. > Why not back off a 100 rpm during the climb instead of engaging the carb > heat?=A0 Wouldn't the lower rpm setting keep you from developing max CHT in > the climb? > well, the enrichment system in the carb would also disengage and it takes a long time to lower the temps just by reducing power. If you have 4 cyl CHT/EGT, go try it. Gary




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   teamgrumman-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/TeamGrumman-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/teamgrumman-list
  • Browse TeamGrumman-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/teamgrumman-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --