Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:42 AM - Re: High Oil Temps (TeamGrumman@aol.com)
2. 02:28 AM - Re: High Oil Temps (FLYaDIVE@AOL.COM)
3. 06:26 AM - Gary's Cowling and the FAA (mark.t.mueller@comcast.net)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: High Oil Temps |
In a message dated 6/14/06 7:06:18 AM, flyv35b@ashcreekwireless.com writes:
> There-are quite a few experimentals that are not well thought out or
> constructed.-
>
OK, true enough. There is one experimental at Fox field that no one will
even try a high speed taxi with.
When I think of experimentals, I think of RVs, Lancairs, etc.
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: High Oil Temps |
In a message dated 6/15/2006 4:44:28 AM Eastern Standard Time,
TeamGrumman@aol.com writes:
There are quite a few experimentals that are not well thought out or
constructed.
OK, true enough. There is one experimental at Fox field that no one will
even try a high speed taxi with.
When I think of experimentals, I think of RVs, Lancairs, etc.
=======================================
When talking experimental it is difficult not to consider the quality of the
building. Just because it is an RV does not mean it fly's like an RV. And
when you talk about "not well thought out", you MUST put Grumman's under that
classification as well.
Barry
"Chop'd Liver"
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Gary's Cowling and the FAA |
I deal with some of these guys from time to time from 'inside the Beltway.' It
is very interesting in that the whole FSDO/ACO/DER concept are almost empires
unto themselves, since management in DC is technically incompetent. There isn't
any consistency mainly because the program managers have no clue. It can
get quite humorous when the guys from the Atlantic City Tech Center are on a conference
call with management types in DC...
The bottom line, until an FAA Administrator comes along that actually spent any
real time in aviation product development or GAMA pays off a lobbiest to put
language into legislation and force the issue, it ain't gonna get any better.
The writing is pretty much on the wall, and why I am leaning towards building my
next plane. I still want to wait and see how the whole "turbodiesel vs. pocket
turbine" contest falls out.
Mark
Tiger N1533R
<html><body>
<DIV>I deal with some of these guys from time to time from 'inside the Beltway.'
It is very interesting in that the whole FSDO/ACO/DER concept are almost
empires unto themselves, since management in DC is technically incompetent.
There isn't any consistency mainly because the program managers have no
clue. It can get quite humorous when the guys from the Atlantic City Tech
Center are on a conference call with management types in DC...</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The bottom line, until an FAA Administrator comes along that actually spent
any real time in aviation product development or GAMA pays off a lobbiest to
put language into legislation and force the issue, it ain't gonna get any better.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The writing is pretty much on the wall, and why I am leaning towards building
my next plane. I still want to wait and see how the whole "turbodiesel
vs. pocket turbine" contest falls out.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Mark</DIV>
<DIV>Tiger N1533R</DIV></body></html>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|