Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:34 AM - Aileron Alternate Compliance (Thomas Campbell)
2. 09:29 AM - Re: Aileron Alternate Compliance (923te)
3. 09:42 AM - Re: Aileron Alternate Compliance (flyv35b)
4. 10:25 AM - Re: Aileron Alternate Compliance (IAN MATTERFACE)
5. 10:28 AM - Re: Aileron Alternate Compliance (IAN MATTERFACE)
6. 10:54 AM - Re: Aileron Alternate Compliance (teamgrumman@AOL.COM)
7. 02:23 PM - 79 Tiger (Denham, Bobby D.)
8. 09:50 PM - Re: 79 Tiger (teamgrumman@AOL.COM)
9. 09:59 PM - Re: 79 Tiger (teamgrumman@aol.com)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Aileron Alternate Compliance |
I am currently doing an anual on my 76 Tiger. My mechanic is wondering
about how the Alternate compliance letter for the Aileron repetitive AD I
have given him ties back to the FAA.
Since on the letter it does not seem to have a reference to the governing
body
of the original AD. Do any of you guys that have Signed off this Alternate
Compliance have an answer for this.
#2 Question ...
On the Flaps thre is a plate(roller plate?!?) about halfway in that is
riveted .. My question is ... Is it supposed to be riveted(if so what
kind) or bonded? And Should there be a matching plate on the wing?
Thomas
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Aileron Alternate Compliance |
Would this be what you are looking for:
http://www.approachaviation.com/common_images/SI_06_01_Approval_letter.jpg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Campbell" <airman@appledumplings.com>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:09 PM
Subject: TeamGrumman-List: Aileron Alternate Compliance
<airman@appledumplings.com>
I am currently doing an anual on my 76 Tiger. My mechanic is wondering
about how the Alternate compliance letter for the Aileron repetitive AD I
have given him ties back to the FAA.
Since on the letter it does not seem to have a reference to the governing
body
of the original AD. Do any of you guys that have Signed off this Alternate
Compliance have an answer for this.
#2 Question ...
On the Flaps thre is a plate(roller plate?!?) about halfway in that is
riveted .. My question is ... Is it supposed to be riveted(if so what
kind) or bonded? And Should there be a matching plate on the wing?
Thomas
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Aileron Alternate Compliance |
A letter, dated August 3, 2006, from the Manager, New York Certification
Office to John Rock at Tiger Aircraft authorizes their SI-06-01 as
acceptable for an AMOC to AD 79-22-04. What more authorization do you need?
Cliff A&P/IA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Campbell" <airman@appledumplings.com>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:09 AM
Subject: TeamGrumman-List: Aileron Alternate Compliance
> <airman@appledumplings.com>
>
> I am currently doing an anual on my 76 Tiger. My mechanic is wondering
> about how the Alternate compliance letter for the Aileron repetitive AD I
> have given him ties back to the FAA.
> Since on the letter it does not seem to have a reference to the governing
> body
> of the original AD. Do any of you guys that have Signed off this Alternate
> Compliance have an answer for this.
>
>
> #2 Question ...
>
> On the Flaps thre is a plate(roller plate?!?) about halfway in that is
> riveted .. My question is ... Is it supposed to be riveted(if so what
> kind) or bonded? And Should there be a matching plate on the wing?
>
> Thomas
>
>
> --
> 7:54 AM
>
--
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Aileron Alternate Compliance |
Yes if you go to the AYA web site I think there is a copy of the signed FAA acceptance
letter to Tiger aircraft.
Ian
Thomas Campbell <airman@appledumplings.com> wrote:
I am currently doing an anual on my 76 Tiger. My mechanic is wondering
about how the Alternate compliance letter for the Aileron repetitive AD I
have given him ties back to the FAA.
Since on the letter it does not seem to have a reference to the governing
body
of the original AD. Do any of you guys that have Signed off this Alternate
Compliance have an answer for this.
#2 Question ...
On the Flaps thre is a plate(roller plate?!?) about halfway in that is
riveted .. My question is ... Is it supposed to be riveted(if so what
kind) or bonded? And Should there be a matching plate on the wing?
Thomas
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Aileron Alternate Compliance |
Having looked again myself I can't find it on the AYA web site, so check out http://www.approachaviation.com/common_images/SI_06_01_Approval_letter.jpg
which is the approval letter from the FAA. Sorry for that.
Ian
MatAir
Thomas Campbell <airman@appledumplings.com> wrote:
I am currently doing an anual on my 76 Tiger. My mechanic is wondering
about how the Alternate compliance letter for the Aileron repetitive AD I
have given him ties back to the FAA.
Since on the letter it does not seem to have a reference to the governing
body
of the original AD. Do any of you guys that have Signed off this Alternate
Compliance have an answer for this.
#2 Question ...
On the Flaps thre is a plate(roller plate?!?) about halfway in that is
riveted .. My question is ... Is it supposed to be riveted(if so what
kind) or bonded? And Should there be a matching plate on the wing?
Thomas
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Aileron Alternate Compliance |
Thomas, go out and look at a few Tigers/Cheetahs/Travelers. You'll
notice a rub strip on both the wing and the flap. They are both
riveted in place. Without the strip, it's possible to lock the flap in
the down position, wedged against the wing, when you deploy the flaps
during landing. The flap really bows out.
As for the AMOC. I would find a Grumman mechanic that is familiar with
the previous ADs and their requirements for compliance. If your
mechanic is not familiar with the plane, Grummans in general, well, I
wouldn't trust him. There is plenty f information in the AMOC to
complete the task.
-----Original Message-----
From: airman@appledumplings.com
Sent: Mon, 21 May 2007 10:09 AM
Subject: TeamGrumman-List: Aileron Alternate Compliance
<airman@appledumplings.com>
I am currently doing an anual on my 76 Tiger. My mechanic is wondering
about how the Alternate compliance letter for the Aileron repetitive AD
I
have given him ties back to the FAA.
Since on the letter it does not seem to have a reference to the
governing
body
of the original AD. Do any of you guys that have Signed off this
Alternate
Compliance have an answer for this.
#2 Question ...
On the Flaps thre is a plate(roller plate?!?) about halfway in that is
riveted .. My question is ... Is it supposed to be riveted(if so what
kind) or bonded? And Should there be a matching plate on the wing?
Thomas
________________________________________________________________________
from AOL at AOL.com.
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Want info info on 79" Tiger
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>79 Tiger</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Want info info on 79" Tiger</FONT>
</P>
<pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier">
</b></font></pre></body></html>
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
-----Original Message-----
From: BDDenham@lasd.org
Sent: Mon, 21 May 2007 2:22 PM
Subject: TeamGrumman-List: 79 Tiger
Want info info on 79" Tiger
________________________________________________________________________
from AOL at AOL.com.
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hey Bobby, I sent them through TeamGrumman-List and at least one was
rejected for being too big. So, I sent them to your email. You may
get a lot of pictures.
-----Original Message-----
From: BDDenham@lasd.org
Sent: Mon, 21 May 2007 2:22 PM
Subject: TeamGrumman-List: 79 Tiger
Want info info on 79" Tiger
________________________________________________________________________
from AOL at AOL.com.
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|