Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:21 AM - Re: TeamGrumman-List Digest: 6 Msgs - 04/01/09 (Thomas Campbell)
2. 06:32 AM - Re: TeamGrumman-List Digest: 6 Msgs - 04/01/09 (Thomas Campbell)
3. 11:11 AM - Re: Re: TeamGrumman-List Digest: 6 Msgs - 04/01/09 (teamgrumman@aol.com)
4. 11:49 AM - cowling update (teamgrumman@aol.com)
5. 11:51 AM - speaking of JPI (teamgrumman@AOL.COM)
6. 12:49 PM - Re: speaking of JPI (Don Curry)
7. 09:21 PM - Re: speaking of JPI (teamgrumman@AOL.COM)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: TeamGrumman-List Digest: 6 Msgs - 04/01/09 |
Maybe not classy but whoever sent me the email with the bogus
return email address would have had to be reading this.
and the point that you would have replied to this post with the whole
reply shows you are just being a jerk as well.
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: TeamGrumman-List Digest: 6 Msgs - 04/01/09 |
Sorry to those thta got sprayed by my response.
My original post had a simple point.
Some people read the digest and you should "think" about being considerate
by just quoting the relevent portions in the reply. Not blatently reply to
the whole thread. When you do this it makes it unreadable for people that
do read the digest. As I see some of you do not care.
And the coward that sent me the private email with the bogus address. Why
hide?
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: TeamGrumman-List Digest: 6 Msgs - 04/01/09 |
maybe if you had the sense to subscribe to the posts instead of the digest you
wouldn't get all of the responses
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Campbell <airman@appledumplings.com>
Sent: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 8:20 am
Subject: TeamGrumman-List: Re: TeamGrumman-List Digest: 6 Msgs - 04/01/09
Sorry to those thta got sprayed by my response.
My original post had a simple point.
Some people read the digest and you should "think" about being considerate
by just quoting the relevent portions in the reply. Not blatently reply to
the whole thread. When you do this it makes it unreadable for people that
do read the digest. As I see some of you do not care.
And the coward that sent me the private email with the bogus address. Why
hide?
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
please pass along my offer for, what amounts to, about a 20% savings on the cowling
to anyone who might not have heard about it.
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
In the latest issue of EAAs Sport Aviation, there are pictures of a new JPI
800 and 830. =C2-They look like smaller versions of the 930 but fit into a
3 1/8 inch instrument hole.
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I'd like to see that; wonder why it's not on JPI's website!
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-teamgrumman-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-teamgrumman-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
teamgrumman@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:51 PM
Subject: TeamGrumman-List: speaking of JPI
In the latest issue of EAAs Sport Aviation, there are pictures of a new
JPI
800 and 830. They look like smaller versions of the 930 but fit into a
3
1/8 inch instrument hole.
_____
Navigator
and much
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List
Web
-Matt
===========
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: speaking of JPI |
I called JPI and the sales girl I talked to didn't know about it. =C2-Afte
r about minutes of silence while she tracked down the information, she came
back. =C2-It's a follow on to the EDM 800. =C2-It's 3 by 4 inches. =C2
-When you go to the JPI web site, click on new products. =C2-I know.
=C2-I had a tough time finding it too. =C2-They are $3800. =C2-Or, if
you have an 800 already, they are a $1200 upgrade. =C2-
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Curry <currydon@bellsouth.net>
Sent: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 12:46 pm
Subject: RE: TeamGrumman-List: speaking of JPI
I=99d like to see that; wonder why it=99s not
on JPI=99s website!
=C2-
=C2-
-----Original Message-----
From:
owner-teamgrumman-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-teamgrumman-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of teamgrumma
n@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, April
02, 2009 2:51 PM
Subject: TeamGrumman-List:
speaking of JPI
=C2-
In the latest issue of
EAAs Sport Aviation, there are pictures of a new JPI 800 and 830. =C2-They
look like smaller versions of the 930 but fit into a 3 1/8 inch instrument
hole.
=C2-
=C2-
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|