Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 07:09 PM - Weight and Balance (teamgrumman@AOL.COM)
2. 07:46 PM - Re: Weight and Balance (Gil Alexander)
3. 08:10 PM - Re: Weight and Balance (teamgrumman@AOL.COM)
4. 08:32 PM - Re: Weight and Balance (flyv35b)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Weight and Balance |
Ned, send me your W&B stuff, the original stuff, and let me create a
database page for it.
I'm going to modify my W&B sample loading to reflect the
pilots/copilots CG at the extremes. I think it was a bad decision not
to include both limits in the original loading paperwork. Who'd be at
fault if a pilot used the sample loading and then crashed because both
front seat passengers fly at the aft location and loaded the plane to
what would have been a safe loading?
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Weight and Balance |
I would presume that the FAA would require a safety factor built into
these limits, just like the +10% (or was it +15%) on your Vne dive tests.
Is this not the case? Do you loose stability EXACTLY at the aft limit?
gil A
At 07:01 PM 6/20/2009, you wrote:
>
>Ned, send me your W&B stuff, the original stuff, and let me create a
>database page for it.
>
>I'm going to modify my W&B sample loading to reflect the
>pilots/copilots CG at the extremes. I think it was a bad decision
>not to include both limits in the original loading paperwork. Who'd
>be at fault if a pilot used the sample loading and then crashed
>because both front seat passengers fly at the aft location and
>loaded the plane to what would have been a safe loading?
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Weight and Balance |
Not sure. But, we can be assured, if it's FAA approved, it has to be
OK. Right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Alexander <gilalex@earthlink.net>
Sent: Sat, Jun 20, 2009 7:43 pm
Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: Weight and Balance
<gilalex@earthlink.net>
I would presume that the FAA would require a safety factor built into
these limits, just like the +10% (or was it +15%) on your Vne dive
tests.
Is this not the case? Do you loose stability EXACTLY at the aft limit?
gil A
At 07:01 PM 6/20/2009, you wrote:
>
>Ned, send me your W&B stuff, the original stuff, and let me create a
>database page for it.
>
>I'm going to modify my W&B sample loading to reflect the
>pilots/copilots CG at the extremes. I think it was a bad decision
>not to include both limits in the original loading paperwork. Who'd
>be at fault if a pilot used the sample loading and then crashed
>because both front seat passengers fly at the aft location and
>loaded the plane to what would have been a safe loading?
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Weight and Balance |
Right On! Does that go for the Airbus also?
----- Original Message -----
From: <teamgrumman@aol.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: Weight and Balance
>
> Not sure. But, we can be assured, if it's FAA approved, it has to be
> OK. Right?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gil Alexander <gilalex@earthlink.net>
> To: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Sat, Jun 20, 2009 7:43 pm
> Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: Weight and Balance
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <gilalex@earthlink.net>
>
>
> I would presume that the FAA would require a safety factor built into
> these limits, just like the +10% (or was it +15%) on your Vne dive
> tests.
>
>
> Is this not the case? Do you loose stability EXACTLY at the aft limit?
>
>
> gil A
>
>
> At 07:01 PM 6/20/2009, you wrote:
>
>
>>
>
>>Ned, send me your W&B stuff, the original stuff, and let me create a
>>database page for it.
>
>>
>
>>I'm going to modify my W&B sample loading to reflect the
>>pilots/copilots CG at the extremes. I think it was a bad decision
>>not to include both limits in the original loading paperwork. Who'd
>>be at fault if a pilot used the sample loading and then crashed
>>because both front seat passengers fly at the aft location and
>>loaded the plane to what would have been a safe loading?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam.
The Professional version does not have this message
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|