Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 03:13 AM - Re: Cowling dimensions (Bob Steward)
2. 06:12 AM - Re: Engine mount shims. Need help. (flyv35b)
3. 06:46 AM - Re: Engine mount shims. Need help. (phil@ReliantAir.com)
4. 08:27 AM - Re: Re: Cowling dimensions (teamgrumman@aol.com)
5. 08:53 AM - Re: Re: Cowling dimensions (teamgrumman@AOL.COM)
6. 09:13 PM - Re: Engine mount shims. Need help. (teamgrumman@aol.com)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Cowling dimensions |
>Bob S, you're a font of knowledge on lots of things. Do you know if there
> are differences between the installed heights of any of the engine mount
> vibration isolators? I know there a a couple of different part numbers
> out there for Tiger/Cheetahs, do they have different installed heights?
I don't have any data on differences in height between the Lord and Barry
mounts. I have shimmed (and in many cased UNshimmed) the engine to mount
configuration to get the spinner centered in the stock nose bowl. IMHO,
the purpose of the shims is to make up for manufacturing tolerances in the
cowling, the mount, and the firewall. Only the bottom shim washers are
required to have the engine clear the steel mount, due to the diameter of
the pressed steel cups that Grumman used. Other brands (C, P, B) have
different designs of steel mount pads, and don't require any lower shims to
be standard.
It is interesting that the experimental crowd just bolts the engine to the
mount, and then fits the cowl with the spinner in the position that it
falls. Could be some pretty large plane to plane variations as the exact
position of the firewall varies, the mount varies, and if you listen to
PowerFlow, even the Lycoming engine varies from unit to unit! And this
could affect the thrust line, which in turn changes the flight characteristics.
Given the problems I've had swapping cowl parts to repair crack damaged
planes, I'd say there probably is AT LEAST 1/4" manufacturing tolerance in
the area you speak of -- distance from firewall to crank flange.
My suggestion is to center the spinner in the stock cowl, and then install
the Jaguar cowl and trim the trailing edge as needed to achieve a good fit.
Alternatively, you might have to construct some sort of jig/fixture that
will confirm the crank flange position relative to the firewall for a
"standard" installation, and then compare that to each plane before the
gross trim of the cowl.
Best wishes, we are all pulling for you!
Bob Steward
Birmingham, AL
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engine mount shims. Need help. |
"Bob S, you're a font of knowledge on lots of things. Do you know if
there are differences between the installed heights of any of the engine
mount vibration isolators? I know there a a couple of different part
numbers out there for Tiger/Cheetahs, do they have different installed
heights?"
There are three different mounts for Tigers, 2 Lord and 1 Barry. The
early Tigers used a J-9613-49, which was changed to an improved
J-9613-59 mount in 1977 as I recall. The Barry mount is a cross for the
-49 Lord mount and no cross for the -59 is available. Many of the
planes that came with the -59 mount have been replaced with the Barry
mount because it is CHEAPER (but not as good). From a stack height
standpoint, all three mounts should be the same I would think but the
-59 mounts have a considerably higher spring rate in compression and
lower spring rate in shear. In effect they will sag less and absorb
torsional vibration better.
Cliff
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engine mount shims. Need help. |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Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Cowling dimensions |
Bob, both this and the one you sent to TeamGrumman@aol.com come to the sam
e mailbox.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Steward <n76lima@mindspring.com>
Sent: Tue, Mar 9, 2010 3:18 am
Subject: TeamGrumman-List: Re: Cowling dimensions
m>
>Bob S, you're a font of knowledge on lots of things. Do you know if ther
e
> are differences between the installed heights of any of the engine moun
t
> vibration isolators? I know there a a couple of different part numbers
> out there for Tiger/Cheetahs, do they have different installed heights?
I don't have any data on differences in height between the Lord and Barry
mounts. I have shimmed (and in many cased UNshimmed) the engine to mount
configuration to get the spinner centered in the stock nose bowl. IMHO,
the purpose of the shims is to make up for manufacturing tolerances in th
e cowling, the mount, and the firewall. Only the bottom shim washers are
required to have the engine clear the steel mount, due to the diameter of
the pressed steel cups that Grumman used. Other brands (C, P, B) have di
fferent designs of steel mount pads, and don't require any lower shims to
be standard.
It is interesting that the experimental crowd just bolts the engine to the
mount, and then fits the cowl with the spinner in the position that it fa
lls. Could be some pretty large plane to plane variations as the exact po
sition of the firewall varies, the mount varies, and if you listen to Powe
rFlow, even the Lycoming engine varies from unit to unit! And this could
affect the thrust line, which in turn changes the flight characteristics.
Given the problems I've had swapping cowl parts to repair crack damaged pl
anes, I'd say there probably is AT LEAST 1/4" manufacturing tolerance in
the area you speak of -- distance from firewall to crank flange.
My suggestion is to center the spinner in the stock cowl, and then install
the Jaguar cowl and trim the trailing edge as needed to achieve a good fi
t.
Alternatively, you might have to construct some sort of jig/fixture that
will confirm the crank flange position relative to the firewall for a "st
andard" installation, and then compare that to each plane before the gross
trim of the cowl.
Best wishes, we are all pulling for you!
Bob Steward
Birmingham, AL
========================
============
========================
============
========================
============
========================
============
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Cowling dimensions |
Bob, could you do me a favor and post this request on GG? The more data
the better.
Thanks
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Steward <n76lima@mindspring.com>
Sent: Tue, Mar 9, 2010 3:18 am
Subject: TeamGrumman-List: Re: Cowling dimensions
m>
>Bob S, you're a font of knowledge on lots of things. Do you know if ther
e
> are differences between the installed heights of any of the engine moun
t
> vibration isolators? I know there a a couple of different part numbers
> out there for Tiger/Cheetahs, do they have different installed heights?
I don't have any data on differences in height between the Lord and Barry
mounts. I have shimmed (and in many cased UNshimmed) the engine to mount
configuration to get the spinner centered in the stock nose bowl. IMHO,
the purpose of the shims is to make up for manufacturing tolerances in th
e cowling, the mount, and the firewall. Only the bottom shim washers are
required to have the engine clear the steel mount, due to the diameter of
the pressed steel cups that Grumman used. Other brands (C, P, B) have di
fferent designs of steel mount pads, and don't require any lower shims to
be standard.
It is interesting that the experimental crowd just bolts the engine to the
mount, and then fits the cowl with the spinner in the position that it fa
lls. Could be some pretty large plane to plane variations as the exact po
sition of the firewall varies, the mount varies, and if you listen to Powe
rFlow, even the Lycoming engine varies from unit to unit! And this could
affect the thrust line, which in turn changes the flight characteristics.
Given the problems I've had swapping cowl parts to repair crack damaged pl
anes, I'd say there probably is AT LEAST 1/4" manufacturing tolerance in
the area you speak of -- distance from firewall to crank flange.
My suggestion is to center the spinner in the stock cowl, and then install
the Jaguar cowl and trim the trailing edge as needed to achieve a good fi
t.
Alternatively, you might have to construct some sort of jig/fixture that
will confirm the crank flange position relative to the firewall for a "st
andard" installation, and then compare that to each plane before the gross
trim of the cowl.
Best wishes, we are all pulling for you!
Bob Steward
Birmingham, AL
========================
============
========================
============
========================
============
========================
============
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engine mount shims. Need help. |
You really should have 1 shim on each of the bottom mounts. The engine ca
se actually contacts the mount if you don't.
The spinner down 1/8 is good. In flight, the engine/spinner comes up. I
bet you wonder how I know this. A little smily face on my cowling told
me. (alternator drive pulley.)
-----Original Message-----
From: phil@ReliantAir.com
Sent: Tue, Mar 9, 2010 6:46 am
Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: Engine mount shims. Need help.
79 Tiger S/N 0942, 2 washers top right, 1 bottom left, none on rest. 39
3/4" FW to spinner. Spinner droops 1/8 " down and to the right. No sag
in Barry mounts that were installed in 2000.
Phil
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
From: teamgrumman@aol.com
Subject: TeamGrumman-List: Engine mount shims. Need help.
Some of you may remember= I asked what the distance was on your Tiger/Ch
eetah from the firewall to= the back of the spinner (you know, the edge
you'd be measuring to if you= laid a measuring tape across the top of
the engine from the firewall to= the aft edge of the spinner. Don't ma
ke this harder than it has to= be).
NOTE: The original tooling was made on N28840. This plane had= one shim
on the top of each mount. A splash made from that original= tooling wa
s fitted on about a half dozen planes. I have pictures of= it on John
Bunker's plane and Vi Bui's plane. They all fit fine. &n=bsp;So, I fin
alized the tooling. From that tooling, a cowling was ma=de and installe
d on N119ST. All of my initial flights were with that= plane.
My original question was a result of, during the fitting of Jaguar co=wl
ing Serial Number: 0 on N1976T, I found that distance to be 39 3/4= inc
hes. Whereas, mine was 40 inches (mine has 2 shims on each top= bushing
). This made the 'trim-to-fit' lines on the cowling about us=eless. I
added shims to the top engine mount bushings and that moved= the engine
down somewhat. Still shy of 40 inches, but, not much. &n=bsp;Fitting
the cowling was still a pain in the ass.
OK, so, then comes Serial Number 1: N3752W was 39 3/4 inches wi=th one
shim on each top. I added one shim each and that moved it to= 40 inche
s. Still, fitting the cowling was odd because the trim line= on the lef
t side of the cowling was right, but, the right side was 1/4 in=ches shy
(meaning I had to trim 1/4 inch more than indicated by the trim= line).
Along the bottom, the trim goes from trim line to 1/4 inches= forward.
I have a spare fuselage with an engine hanging on it. With one= shim on
each top mount, it was a little over 39 3/4, say 39 13/16. =I added on
e shim to each and got about 40 inches. Great. Or so= I thought. I be
gan fitting a cowling for another plane using that= configuration. Stil
l, it was off about 1/4 inches on the right side=.
Solution: I installed the cowling from my plane onto the spare= fuselag
e. The result was, in order to get the engine to align with= the my cow
ling, I had to add an additional 1/2 shim to the right and remo=ve 1 shi
m from the left. Both bottom mounts have 1 shim each.
I have N119ST in my hangar. It has no shims on the top left, on=e on th
e top right and one each on the bottom mounts. That engine is= 40 1/16
from the firewall to the spinner.
So, please do my a favor, a big favor, and look at your spinner to no=se
bowl alignment. Then give me the following information.
Alignment: (e.g., aligned, spinner is to the right and down, et=c.)
Distance from firewall to spinner: (i.e., measure from the fire=wall ad
jacent to where the hinge mounts and the aft edge of the spinner)
Then engine mount shim configuration:
Top Left: (e.g., 1 shim, 2 shims, etc)
Top right: ( same )
Bottom left: (same )
Bottom right ( same).
Bob S, you're a font of knowledge on lots of things. Do you kno=w if th
ere are differences between the installed heights of any of the eng=ine
mount vibration isolators? I know there a a couple of different= part
numbers out there for Tiger/Cheetahs, do they have different install=ed
heights?
You all (Y'all, Garner) might want to know why it makes a difference.=
As installed, my prop spinner to cowling gap is about .100 to .120= in
ches. Trust me, it makes a difference. Please, I need to kn=ow how muc
h variation there is in the installed distances.
Thanks in advance.
Gary
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|