Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:41 AM - Re: Re: Tinnerman speed nuts #4 (Ian's)
2. 05:50 AM - Re: Flying 626 (lmassaro)
3. 09:59 AM - Re: Re: Flying 626 (Gary Vogt)
4. 12:43 PM - Re: Re: Flying 626 (Andrew Kuzyk)
5. 01:47 PM - Re: Re: Flying 626 (Bob Steward)
6. 06:48 PM - New brake fairings (Gary Vogt)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Tinnerman speed nuts #4 |
What I mean is not all that appears on the internet ends up being available w
hen you actually try to order. As this is a US company that is why I suggest
ed it best someone in the US enquires rather than the me on the UK. Only try
ing to help.
Ian
Sent from my iPhone
On 21 Dec 2011, at 02:10, Gary Vogt <teamgrumman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> When I click on the Falcon link, the price comes up as $.16 each.
>
> What do you mean, "If you get stuck with Falcon?"
>
> 16 cents is reasonable.
>
> From: grumpyparts <i.r.m@btinternet.com>
> To: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 7:50 AM
> Subject: TeamGrumman-List: Re: Tinnerman speed nuts #4
>
m>
>
> Gary and Bob
>
> The A6187-4Z-1's came in today, they look good. If you get stuck with Falc
on I have 50 and will be getting more.
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=361201#361201
>
>
>
>
> Attachments:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com//files/a6187_4-= (And Get Some AWES
OME FREE Gifts!)www.aert="_blank" href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">ww
w.buildersbooks.comhttp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-Listhttp:/
/ww======================
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
>
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Your right in that the original wing lights are crap.
On 9186M, I put the 50W XeVison HIDs on the wings with the flasher option and have
more than enough light for landing. They are nicknamed, the "Blowtorches".
Not only do they provide a ton of light for landing, but I leave them on flash
all the time day or night. Ive had the tower at KRNM even comment on them
saying they are so much easier to pick out in the haze on some days.
Aside from the obvious fact that the original lights aren't that bright anyway,
the positioning of lights on the wing eliminate the issue of "vibration induced"
failures of the incandescent bulbs. I have a 172 that I rent and I simply
had enough of replacing that damn light. Finally went LED.
As far as 626FT, it will be nice to see how it trues out when we get a Jaguar on
it with that new induction system.
Regards,
L. Massaro
9186M KRNM
626FT KAUN
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=361396#361396
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I know some people light the wing tip lights. -Yea, they look like a big
airliner. -They look cool. -Brightness isn't the issue. -Other planes
/pilots seeing me 25 miles away isn't the issue. -When landing and taxiin
g, I want to see the MIDDLE of the runway and taxiway. -I'm not intereste
d in seeing what happens on the edges of the runway/taxiway. -=0A=0AThe i
nstallation of the lights on an AG5B PROHIBITS aiming them at the centerlin
e, even if you wanted to. -They sit too far into the wing and the opening
is too narrow.=0A=0AI hear all the time about how the landing lights don't
last in a Grumman. -I think I've replaced the one in mine once in 500 ho
urs. -But, then, I only use it to land at night and taxi to my hangar.=0A
=0ADave has the design of the new inlet for the Jaguar cowling for an AG5B.
-=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0A From: lmassaro <lmassaro@t
ac-eng.com>=0ATo: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com =0ASent: Wednesday, Decemb
er 21, 2011 5:48 AM=0ASubject: TeamGrumman-List: Re: Flying 626=0A =0A--> T
eamGrumman-List message posted by: "lmassaro" <lmassaro@tac-eng.com>=0A=0AY
our right in that the original wing lights are crap.- =0AOn 9186M, I put
the 50W XeVison HIDs on the wings with the flasher option and have more tha
n enough light for landing.- They are nicknamed, the "Blowtorches".- No
t only do they provide a ton of light for landing, but I leave them on flas
h all the time day or night.- Ive had the tower at KRNM even comment on t
hem saying they are so much easier to pick out in the haze on some days.=0A
=0AAside from the obvious fact that the original lights aren't that bright
anyway, the positioning of lights on the wing eliminate the issue of "vibra
tion induced" failures of the incandescent bulbs.- I have a 172 that I re
nt and I simply had enough of replacing that damn light.- Finally went LE
D.=0A=0AAs far as 626FT, it will be nice to see how it trues out when we ge
t a Jaguar on it with that new induction system.=0A=0ARegards,=0AL. Massaro
=0A9186M KRNM=0A626FT KAUN=0A=0A=0A=0A=0ARead this topic online here:=0A=0A
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=361396#361396=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
=
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Has anyone installed Powerburst Lights by Aveo Engineering
http://www.aveoengineering.com/Aviation/Airplane_LED_Lights/index.php.
Of course the certified are more expensive than the non certified. I
was planning on installing marker lights.
Andrew Kuzyk BID, ACIDO, RGD // Partner
T: 416-368-6988 x 222
M: 416-706-4490
Gottschalk and Ash International has merged with
Entro Communications to form Entro | G+A.
Entro Communications
122 Parliament St. Toronto, Canada M5A 2Y8
F: 416-368-5616 www.entro.com
TORONTO CALGARY Z=DCRICH
On Dec 21, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Gary Vogt wrote:
> I know some people light the wing tip lights. Yea, they look like a
big airliner. They look cool. Brightness isn't the issue. Other
planes/pilots seeing me 25 miles away isn't the issue. When landing and
taxiing, I want to see the MIDDLE of the runway and taxiway. I'm not
interested in seeing what happens on the edges of the runway/taxiway.
>
> The installation of the lights on an AG5B PROHIBITS aiming them at the
centerline, even if you wanted to. They sit too far into the wing and
the opening is too narrow.
>
> I hear all the time about how the landing lights don't last in a
Grumman. I think I've replaced the one in mine once in 500 hours. But,
then, I only use it to land at night and taxi to my hangar.
>
> Dave has the design of the new inlet for the Jaguar cowling for an
AG5B.
>
> From: lmassaro <lmassaro@tac-eng.com>
> To: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 5:48 AM
> Subject: TeamGrumman-List: Re: Flying 626
>
<lmassaro@tac-eng.com>
>
> Your right in that the original wing lights are crap.
> On 9186M, I put the 50W XeVison HIDs on the wings with the flasher
option and have more than enough light for landing. They are nicknamed,
the "Blowtorches". Not only do they provide a ton of light for landing,
but I leave them on flash all the time day or night. Ive had the tower
at KRNM even comment on them saying they are so much easier to pick out
in the haze on some days.
>
> Aside from the obvious fact that the original lights aren't that
bright anyway, the positioning of lights on the wing eliminate the issue
of "vibration induced" failures of the incandescent bulbs. I have a 172
that I rent and I simply had enough of replacing that damn light.
Finally went LED.
>
> As far as 626FT, it will be nice to see how it trues out when we get a
Jaguar on it with that new induction system.
>
> Regards,
> L. Massaro
> 9186M KRNM
> 626FT KAUN
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=361396#361396
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Builder's Bookstore
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List<========
================http://www.ma=====
================
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Please Note: Entro | G+A will be closed for the holidays from Monday, De
cember 26, 2011 and will reopen Monday, January 2, 2012.
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY. This communication, including any information
transmitted with it, is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) and
is confidential. If you are not an intended recipient or responsible for
delivering the message to an intended recipient, any review, disclosure,
conversion to hard copy, dissemination, reproduction or other use of any
part of this communication is strictly prohibited, as is the taking or o
mitting of any action in reliance upon this communication. If you receive
d this communication in error or without authorization please notify us i
mmediately by return e-mail or otherwise and permanently delete the entir
e communication from any computer, disk drive, or other storage medium.
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Yeah, we put a set on a non-Grumman. Nav/Strobe combo on the wingtips.
Got FAA approval, which wasn't that hard, but took 3 months while it waited on
their backlog.
--Bob Steward
Birmingham, AL
Sent from Samsung mobile
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | New brake fairings |
Garner sent me a set of the new, thicker brake fairings. They are about twice as
thick.
I know I complain a lot about the quality, fit, and finish on a lot of parts, and
I was ready to complain about these.
Garner says they are each 8 oz heavier. I didn't compare them, so, I'll take his
word for it.
Now, after installing them, I can say,
"I only wish every part fit as well as these do. Beats the hell out of the earlier
ones."
Being thicker makes countersinking for the washers a LOT easier.
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|