Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:20 AM - Re: New larger battery tray: First install (923te)
2. 06:31 AM - Re: New larger battery tray: First install (Bob Steward)
3. 06:49 AM - Re: New larger battery tray: First install (923te)
4. 08:31 AM - Re: New larger battery tray: First install (923te)
5. 08:44 AM - Re: New larger battery tray: First install (923te)
6. 05:59 PM - Re: New larger battery tray: First install (Gary Vogt)
7. 06:00 PM - Re: New larger battery tray: First install (Gary Vogt)
8. 06:01 PM - Re: New larger battery tray: First install (Gary Vogt)
9. 06:19 PM - Re: New larger battery tray: First install (923te)
10. 06:58 PM - Re: New larger battery tray: First install (Gary Vogt)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: New larger battery tray: First install |
What Battery size did John go back with?
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: New larger battery tray: First install |
35ah. Fred said they needed the weight to offset the engine weight.
Sent from Samsung mobile
923te <923te@att.net> wrote:
>What Battery size did John go back with?
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: New larger battery tray: First install |
I was thinking that Gary installed a Grumman battery tray that a 35ah is
too long for....
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Steward
To: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:29 AM
Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: New larger battery tray: First install
<n76lima@mindspring.com>
35ah. Fred said they needed the weight to offset the engine weight.
Sent from Samsung mobile
923te <923te@att.net> wrote:
>What Battery size did John go back with?
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: New larger battery tray: First install |
Oh I see the Subject line now where it says LARGER. A field approval should b
e easy on that one
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 20, 2012, at 8:48 AM, "923te" <923te@att.net> wrote:
> I was thinking that Gary installed a Grumman battery tray that a 35ah is t
oo long for....
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bob Steward
> To: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:29 AM
> Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: New larger battery tray: First install
>
m>
>
> 35ah. Fred said they needed the weight to offset the engine weight.
>
> Sent from Samsung mobile
>
> 923te <923te@att.net> wrote:
>
> >What Battery size did John go back nbsp; Features Chat, http://www.
mnbsp; via the Web href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.
matronics.com
> _p; generous bsp; href="http://www.matronics.
com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c===========
=====
>
>
>
>
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
>
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: New larger battery tray: First install |
My aft battery tray is the stock AG5B that came from the factory. It has the
long side mounted to the attachment wall. That is it is transverse rather t
han longitudinally mounted. This puts less stress on the honeycomb thru bolt
s since the moment is shorter. I used the bigger AN970 washers and the spoo
ls to keep from crushing the honeycomb. FAA accepted the data from Maynard C
rosby's 2 place STC and from the SaberToothed Tiger.
It only took about 25 pages or so of paperwork and about 6 weeks of review a
nd rewrites and one on site inspection to get the field approval...
I think moving the battery back there combined with some other tweaks was on
e of the better speed mods I've done. And now the Short Stack Powerflow does
n't cook my battery anymore.!
Ned
On Jan 20, 2012, at 8:48 AM, "923te" <923te@att.net> wrote:
> I was thinking that Gary installed a Grumman battery tray that a 35ah is t
oo long for....
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bob Steward
> To: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:29 AM
> Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: New larger battery tray: First install
>
m>
>
> 35ah. Fred said they needed the weight to offset the engine weight.
>
> Sent from Samsung mobile
>
> 923te <923te@att.net> wrote:
>
> >What Battery size did John go back nbsp; Features Chat, http://www.
mnbsp; via the Web href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.
matronics.com
> _p; generous bsp; href="http://www.matronics.
com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c===========
=====
>
>
>
>
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
>
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: New larger battery tray: First install |
G-35=0A=0AOne note I forgot to include. -His battery showed signs of bein
g overheated. -Not sure if eliminating the metal container would have hel
ped, but it wouldn't hurt.=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0A From
: 923te <923te@att.net>=0ATo: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com =0ASent: Frida
y, January 20, 2012 6:19 AM=0ASubject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: New larger bat
tery tray: First install=0A =0A=0A =0AWhat Battery size did John go back
======================
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: New larger battery tray: First install |
NO, my tray is for the G-35. =C2-Maynard just cut off the end and let the
battery hang over. =C2-Beautiful workmanship, let's of attention to deta
il.=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0A From: 923te <923te@att.net>
=0ATo: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com =0ASent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:4
8 AM=0ASubject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: New larger battery tray: First instal
l=0A =0A=0A=EF=BB =0AI was thinking that Gary installed a Grumman =0Aba
ttery tray that a 35ah is too long for....=0A----- Original Message -----
=0A>From: Bob Steward =0A>To: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com =0A>Sent: Fri
day, January 20, 2012 8:29 AM=0A>Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: New larger
battery tray: First install=0A>=0A>--> TeamGrumman-List message posted by
: Bob Steward <n76lima@mindspring.com>=0A>=0A>35ah. =0A Fred said they nee
ded the weight to offset the engine weight.=0A>=0A>Sent from =0A Samsung m
obile=0A>=0A>923te <923te@att.net> wrote:=0A>=0A>>What =0A Battery size di
d John go back =0A nbsp;=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- =0AFeatures
=0AChat, http://www.mnbsp;=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- =0Avia the Web hr
ef="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com=0A>_p;=C2-
=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- =0Agenerous =0A bsp;=C2-=C2
-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- =0A href="http://www.matronics.com/contri
bution">http://www.matronics.com/c=============
=
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: New larger battery tray: First install |
No field approval necessary. -The battery was part of the STC. -The tra
y is owner produced.=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0A From: 923t
e <923te@att.net>=0ATo: "teamgrumman-list@matronics.com" <teamgrumman-list@
matronics.com> =0ASent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:28 AM=0ASubject: Re: Tea
mGrumman-List: New larger battery tray: First install=0A =0A=0AOh I see the
Subject line now where it says LARGER. A field approval should be easy on
that one=0A=0ASent from my iPhone=0A=0AOn Jan 20, 2012, at 8:48 AM, "923te"
<923te@att.net> wrote:=0A=0A=0AI was thinking that Gary installed a Grumma
n =0Abattery tray that a 35ah is too long for....=0A>----- Original Message
----- =0A>>From: Bob Steward =0A>>To: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com =0A>
>Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:29 AM=0A>>Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List:
New larger battery tray: First install=0A>>=0A>>--> TeamGrumman-List mess
age posted by: Bob Steward <n76lima@mindspring.com>=0A>>=0A>>35ah. =0A Fre
d said they needed the weight to offset the engine weight.=0A>>=0A>>Sent fr
om =0A Samsung mobile=0A>>=0A>>923te <923te@att.net> wrote:=0A>>=0A>>>What
=0A Battery size did John go back =0A nbsp;------ =0AFeature
s =0AChat, http://www.mnbsp;----- =0Avia the Web href="http://
forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com=0A>>_p;------
-- =0Agenerous =0A bsp;---------------
---- =0A href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www
.matronics.com/c==================0A>>=0A
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: New larger battery tray: First install |
Maynard used a Piper box on the original Sabertooth Tiger. Seems Coze had to
ld me that he did ALL the work on his Sabertooth STC...
Not sure where you came up with Maynard cutting off a box??
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Gary Vogt <teamgrumman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> NO, my tray is for the G-35. Maynard just cut off the end and let the bat
tery hang over. Beautiful workmanship, let's of attention to detail.
>
> From: 923te <923te@att.net>
> To: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:48 AM
> Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: New larger battery tray: First install
>
> =EF=BB
> I was thinking that Gary installed a Grumman battery tray that a 35ah is t
oo long for....
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bob Steward
> To: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:29 AM
> Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: New larger battery tray: First install
>
m>
>
> 35ah. Fred said they needed the weight to offset the engine weight.
>
> Sent from Samsung mobile
>
> 923te <923te@att.net> wrote:
>
> >What Battery size did John go back nbsp; Features Chat, http://www.
mnbsp; via the Web href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.m
atronics.com
> _p; generous bsp; href="http://www.matronics.
com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c===========
=====
>
>
> http://www.matronics.com -->
>
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
>
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: New larger battery tray: First install |
the tray that holds the box is the production AA5A tray with the end cut of
f. =C2-The box is a Piper box.=0A=0AThere is a distinction between the tr
ay and the box.=0A=0ADon't feel bad. =C2-There are a lot of folks that do
n't understand the words I write.=0A=0A=0A________________________________
=0A From: 923te <923te@att.net>=0ATo: "teamgrumman-list@matronics.com" <tea
mgrumman-list@matronics.com> =0ASent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:16 PM=0ASu
bject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: New larger battery tray: First install=0A =0A
=0AMaynard used a Piper box on the original Sabertooth Tiger. Seems Coze ha
d told me that he did ALL the work on his Sabertooth STC...=0ANot sure wher
e you came up with Maynard cutting off a box??=0ASent from my iPhone=0A=0AO
n Jan 20, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Gary Vogt <teamgrumman@yahoo.com> wrote:=0A=0A
=0ANO, my tray is for the G-35. =C2-Maynard just cut off the end and let
the battery hang over. =C2-Beautiful workmanship, let's of attention to d
etail.=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>________________________________=0A> From: 923te <923
te@att.net>=0A>To: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com =0A>Sent: Friday, January
20, 2012 6:48 AM=0A>Subject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: New larger battery tray
: First install=0A> =0A>=0A>=EF=BB =0A>I was thinking that Gary install
ed a Grumman =0Abattery tray that a 35ah is too long for....=0A>----- Origi
nal Message ----- =0A>>From: Bob Steward =0A>>To: teamgrumman-list@matroni
cs.com =0A>>Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:29 AM=0A>>Subject: Re: TeamGr
umman-List: New larger battery tray: First install=0A>>=0A>>--> TeamGrumma
n-List message posted by: Bob Steward <n76lima@mindspring.com>=0A>>=0A>>35a
h. =0A Fred said they needed the weight to offset the engine weight.=0A>>
=0A>>Sent from =0A Samsung mobile=0A>>=0A>>923te <923te@att.net> wrote:=0A
>>=0A>>>What =0A Battery size did John go back =0A nbsp;=C2-=C2-=C2
-=C2-=C2-=C2- =0AFeatures =0AChat, http://www.mnbsp;=C2-=C2-=C2
-=C2-=C2- =0Avia the Web href="http://forums.matronics.com">http:/
/forums.matronics.com=0A>>_p;=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2
- =0Agenerous =0A bsp;=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-
=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2-=C2- =0A hre
f="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c=
=================0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>http://w
ww.matronics.com --> =================
===================0A-List">http://www.
matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List ===========
======================== um
s.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com=0A=========
==0Ahttp://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contr
ibution=0A=====================
=======
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|