Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:25 AM - Re: Interesting Article on Failing inspection. (flyv35b)
2. 10:43 AM - Re: Interesting Article on Failing inspection. (Gary Vogt)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Interesting Article on Failing inspection. |
On 3/4/2012 11:21 PM, Gary L Vogt wrote:
> I made my own inspection checklist just because of this. The order of
> items to be checked does a number of engine checks that might fail an
> annual. For example, I got caught in a "catch 22" with an engine that
> failed a compression test but I'd already changed the oil and checked
> the timing.
>
> Gary
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Mar 4, 2012, at 6:27 AM, Walt Beaulieu <aviation@acs-group.net
> <mailto:aviation@acs-group.net>> wrote:
>
>> Interesting article... I did not know this.
>>
>> http://www.sportaviationonline.org/sportaviation/201203?pg=54#pg54
>>
This has been noted in the FAR's for as long as I can remember. It is
rarely used, however. I think I only failed to sign off one annual
inspection and provided the owner a list of discrepancies during the
past 15 years. Mike does make an interesting comment that an owner can
request a list of discrepancies and such a sign off if he disagrees with
the IA over some issue, and then take it to some other A&P who may agree
with the owner and thereby get the discrepancy "corrected". This could
be a very subjective decision on the part of both. Seems like the IA
doing the annual inspection should state his reason as to why the item
is unairworthy.
Also, I have wondered why the IA should not put the list of
discrepancies in the log book rather than handing the owner a list of a
piece of paper which could be modified and even forged.
Cliff
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Interesting Article on Failing inspection. |
"Also, I have wondered why the IA should not put the list of discrepancies
in the log book rather than handing the owner a list of a piece of paper wh
ich could be modified and even forged."=0A=0AMy thoughts exactly. -I keep
a running inspection checklist and give that to the owner. -=0A=0AThe pl
ane I flew to Ames, IA, I had bee maintaining for 6 years. -LOTS of comme
nts in the checklist. -I told the owner to request just the checklist.
-Lot more info in it. -=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0A Fro
m: flyv35b <flyv35b@minetfiber.com>=0ATo: teamgrumman-list@matronics.com
=0ASent: Monday, March 5, 2012 6:24 AM=0ASubject: Re: TeamGrumman-List: Int
eresting Article on Failing inspection.=0A =0A--> TeamGrumman-List message
posted by: flyv35b <flyv35b@minetfiber.com>=0A=0AOn 3/4/2012 11:21 PM, Gary
L Vogt wrote:=0A> I made my own inspection checklist just because of this.
The order of=0A> items to be checked does a number of engine checks that m
ight fail an=0A> annual. For example, I got caught in a "catch 22" with an
engine that=0A> failed a compression test but I'd already changed the oil a
nd checked=0A> the timing.=0A> =0A> Gary=0A> Sent from my iPad=0A> =0A> On
Mar 4, 2012, at 6:27 AM, Walt Beaulieu <aviation@acs-group.net=0A> <mailto:
aviation@acs-group.net>> wrote:=0A> =0A>> Interesting article... I did not
know this.=0A>> =0A>> http://www.sportaviationonline.org/sportaviation/2012
03?pg=54#pg54=0A>> =0A=0AThis has been noted in the FAR's for as long as
I can remember.- It is rarely used, however.- I think I only failed to
sign off one annual inspection and provided the owner a list of discrepanci
es during the past 15 years.- Mike does make an interesting comment that
an owner can request a list of discrepancies and such a sign off if he disa
grees with the IA over some issue, and then take it to some other A&P who m
ay agree with the owner and thereby get the discrepancy "corrected".- Thi
s could be a very subjective decision on the part of both.- Seems like th
e IA doing the annual inspection should state his reason as to why the item
is unairworthy.=0A=0AAlso, I have wondered why the IA should not put the l
ist of discrepancies in the log book rather than handing the owner a list o
f a piece of paper which could be modified and even forged.=0A=0ACliff=0A
==================
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|