TeamGrumman-List Digest Archive

Fri 06/22/12


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:57 AM - Re: Wing friction and speed... (Richard Mutzman)
     2. 11:15 AM - Re: Re: Wing friction and speed... (Gary Vogt)
     3. 12:55 PM - Re: Re: Wing friction and speed... (FLYaDIVE)
     4. 02:27 PM - Re: wings and things (Richard Mutzman)
     5. 07:51 PM - Re: Re: wings and things (Gary Vogt)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:57:48 AM PST US
    From: Richard Mutzman <rcmutz@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: Wing friction and speed...
    All: The visousity of the fluid=2C the velocity of that fluid over the surface =2C and the length of the surface (ie Reynolds Number) are a major players here in how the boundry layer behaves. Before sanding or dimpling your win gs=2C I would recommend you do some serious reading on boundary layer theor y for compressible fluids. PS- I know Roger's response is somewhat tongue and cheek we applied to air plane wings. Richard Mutzman BSAE=2C MSAE N399RM Message: 5 From: Roger Rowlett <rrowlett@colgate.edu> Subject: Wing friction and speed... Content-Type: text/plain=3B charset="us-ascii" OK=2C I was intrigued by the recent discussion about the influence of hull roughness on flying speed. In particular=2C I was curious about the theory of sanding boat hulls to gain speed=2C so I decided to ask a championship small-boat sailor I know about it. Here is is response for improving the speed of your favorite Grumman: "By all means sand your wings [to get more speed]. Use 100 grit paper and work down to 60 grit. Then pound the wings with a large ball peen hammer with extra attention to the leading edges. Then down a bottle of Jack Daniels and go flying and you will notice the difference. Seriously=2C "wet sanding" with up to 600 grit wet or dry sandpaper used wet is a common "go fast" treatment for sailboat hulls and I have done it on painted wood boats I have raced." I wouldn't recommend altering your Grumman's wings according to my colleague's instructions=2C but in the sailing community some appropriate application of the boundary effect is known and used. Based on the deteriorating condition of the paint on my AA-5 upper wing surface=2C I should have the fastest model around. :) Cheers=2C _______________________________________ Roger Rowlett AA-5 N7159L KVGC


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:15:21 AM PST US
    From: Gary Vogt <teamgrumman@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Wing friction and speed...
    A few years ago, many probably, Hot Rod magazine did an article on skin fri ction and how it affected drag cars and Indy cars. -Their conclusion: und er 100 mph, the surface smoothness has a negligible effect. -Between 100 and 150 mph, it had some effect, i.e., the smoother the better. -Over 150 mph, aerodynamics really are the primary factors and controlling flow dire ction and separation had a big effect. -=0A=0ABottom line is, the brake f airing fit to the wheel pant has a bigger influence than a waxed wing at to p speed. -Hell, the VOR antennas create more drag than an unwaxed wing. =0A=0A=0A________________________________=0A From: Richard Mutzman <rcmutz@ msn.com>=0ATo: Team Grumman <teamgrumman-list@matronics.com> =0ASent: Frida y, June 22, 2012 8:57 AM=0ASubject: TeamGrumman-List: Re: Wing friction and speed...=0A =0A=0A =0AAll:=0A-=0AThe visousity of the fluid, the velocit y of that fluid over the surface, and the length of the surface (ie Reynold s Number)-are a major players here in how the boundry layer behaves.- B efore sanding or dimpling your wings, I would recommend you do some serious reading on boundary layer theory for compressible fluids.=0A-=0APS-- I know Roger's response is somewhat tongue and cheek we applied to airplane wings.- =0A=0ARichard Mutzman=0ABSAE, MSAE=0AN399RM=0A-=0AMessage: 5=0A te.edu>=0ATo: grumman-gang@mailman.xmission.com=0ASubject: Wing friction an d speed...=0AMessage-ID: <4FDF4148.3050407@colgate.edu>=0AContent-Type: tex t/plain; charset="us-ascii"=0A=0AOK, I was intrigued by the recent discus sion about the influence of hull =0Aroughness on flying speed. In particula r, I was curious about the theory =0Aof sanding boat hulls to gain speed, s o I decided to ask a championship =0Asmall-boat sailor I know about it. Her e is is response for improving the =0Aspeed of your favorite Grumman:=0A=0A "By all means sand your wings [to get more speed]. Use 100 grit=0Apaper and work down to 60 grit. Then pound the wings with a large=0Aball peen hammer with extra attention to the leading edges. Then=0Adown a bottle of Jack Da niels and go flying and you will notice the=0Adifference. Seriously, "wet s anding" with up to 600 grit wet or dry=0Asandpaper used wet is a common "go fast" treatment for sailboat=0Ahulls and I have done it on painted wood bo ats I have raced."=0A=0AI wouldn't recommend altering your Grumman's wings according to my =0Acolleague's instructions, but in the sailing community s ome appropriate =0Aapplication of the boundary effect is known and used. Ba sed on the =0Adeteriorating condition of the paint on my AA-5 upper wing su rface, I =0Ashould have the fastest model around. :)=0A=0ACheers,=0A=0A____ ___________________________________=0ARoger Rowlett=0AAA-5 N7159L=0AKVGC=0A ====================


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:55:12 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Wing friction and speed...
    From: FLYaDIVE <flyadive@gmail.com>
    Richard: "Somewhat"!!! I posted the original on how dirt and sanding would lower the COF and improve the boundary layer. But Roger is total Tong In Cheek. Busting grains of sand a bit... Come on 100 Grit and 600 Grit. Our planes are so unbelievably dirty (as most planes are) you would not believe it. I have flow my plane without the rubber wing seat seal and without the sump covers (all at the same time) and there was NO noticeable difference in speed. There is so much drag created by every sharp corner - Such as between the fuselage and the wing or the fuselage and the Horz Stab and the Vert Stab and the turtle deck and the dorsal fin and the turtle deck and how about the gaping hole and its counterbalance weight. Want to reduce drag? Work on those! And every round object such as Gary mentioned (VOR ANT) produces four (4) times the drag as the same size FLAT object would. So, if you want your plane to look pretty - Go wash & wax it, we'll all go Oooo and Ahhhhh after you park. But, forget the Pilot Induced Ballistic Speed (BS) about gains. Oh, one more speed area - Reduce your vertical step length by 3" and that will take the step out of the clean air and into the dirty air around the body. "A 1/4 of a MPH here and a 1/4 of a MPH there and sooner or later you are Super Sonic" Bob Gibson Barry On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Richard Mutzman <rcmutz@msn.com> wrote: > All: > > The visousity of the fluid, the velocity of that fluid over the surface, > and the length of the surface (ie Reynolds Number) are a major players here > in how the boundry layer behaves. Before sanding or dimpling your wings, I > would recommend you do some serious reading on boundary layer theory for > compressible fluids. > > PS- I know Roger's response is somewhat tongue and cheek we applied to > airplane wings. > > Richard Mutzman > BSAE, MSAE > N399RM > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:55:04 -0400 > From: Roger Rowlett <rrowlett@colgate.edu> > To: grumman-gang@mailman.xmission.com > Subject: Wing friction and speed... > Message-ID: <4FDF4148.3050407@colgate.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > OK, I was intrigued by the recent discussion about the influence of hull > roughness on flying speed. In particular, I was curious about the theory > of sanding boat hulls to gain speed, so I decided to ask a championship > small-boat sailor I know about it. Here is is response for improving the > speed of your favorite Grumman: > > "By all means sand your wings [to get more speed]. Use 100 grit > paper and work down to 60 grit. Then pound the wings with a large > ball peen hammer with extra attention to the leading edges. Then > down a bottle of Jack Daniels and go flying and you will notice the > difference. Seriously, "wet sanding" with up to 600 grit wet or dry > sandpaper used wet is a common "go fast" treatment for sailboat > hulls and I have done it on painted wood boats I have raced." > > I wouldn't recommend altering your Grumman's wings according to my > colleague's instructions, but in the sailing community some appropriate > application of the boundary effect is known and used. Based on the > deteriorating condition of the paint on my AA-5 upper wing surface, I > should have the fastest model around. :) > > Cheers, > > _______________________________________ > Roger Rowlett > AA-5 N7159L > KVGC > > * > > * > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:27:33 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: wings and things
    From: Richard Mutzman <rcmutz@msn.com>
    Guys, I agree with you both on all accounts. Lots of dirty air around a Grumman, and areas that could be cleaned up. Btw... I meant to send this to Grumman Gang not Team Grumman. Richard Sent from my ipad


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:51:14 PM PST US
    From: Gary Vogt <teamgrumman@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: wings and things
    It was fun to read it. -=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0A From : Richard Mutzman <rcmutz@msn.com>=0ATo: Team Grumman <teamgrumman-list@mat ronics.com> =0ASent: Friday, June 22, 2012 2:29 PM=0ASubject: TeamGrumman-L hard Mutzman <rcmutz@msn.com>=0A=0AGuys,=0A=0AI agree with you both on all accounts. Lots of dirty air around a Grumman, and areas that could be clean ed up. =0A=0ABtw...- I meant to send this to Grumman Gang not Team Grumma ===========




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   teamgrumman-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/TeamGrumman-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/teamgrumman-list
  • Browse TeamGrumman-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/teamgrumman-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --