TeamGrumman-List Digest Archive

Wed 09/26/12


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:51 AM - Re: Re: Melted wire -- emergency bypass of the Master Solenoid? (Dan Schmitz)
     2. 11:17 AM - Aux power (Gary Vogt)
     3. 07:00 PM - Aileron Counter Balance Weight (923te)
     4. 07:47 PM - Re: Aileron Counter Balance Weight (n76lima@mindspring.com)
     5. 08:22 PM - Re: Aileron Counter Balance Weight (923te)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:51:37 AM PST US
    From: Dan Schmitz <Dan.Schmitz@calix.com>
    Subject: Re: Melted wire -- emergency bypass of the Master
    Solenoid? My splitter has about an 18" cord that runs from the socket to the splitter . The splitter sits under the passenger seat and the cords to various devi ces are taped to the side of the console so that passengers don't get tangl ed up in them. None of the cords go with me when I leave the plane. Dan Schmitz Tiger 4518B KASH I have an Aera 550, an Ipad and a portable Intercom which all need power fr om the cigarette lighter. Has anyone installed multiple power outlets, whe re the existing outlet is? I currently use a three outlet adapter which kee ps popping out just enough so as not to charge anything.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:17:55 AM PST US
    From: Gary Vogt <teamgrumman@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Aux power
    I only have one aux power supply (cigarette lighter) mounted under the inst rument panel on the brace to the firewall. =C2-I only use it to charge my cell phone or iPad. =C2-Nothing stays plugged in. =C2-=0A=0AGarmin 340 Audio Panel=0A2 Garmin 430's =C2-(no VOR connections)=0AGarmin 327 Trans ponder. =C2-=0A=0ANo need to plug anything in.=0A=0A=0A__________________ ______________=0A From: Dan Schmitz <Dan.Schmitz@calix.com>=0ATo: "teamgrum man-list@matronics.com" <teamgrumman-list@matronics.com> =0ASent: Wednesday , September 26, 2012 4:51 AM=0ASubject: RE: TeamGrumman-List: Re: Melted wi re -- emergency bypass of the Master Solenoid?=0A =0A=0A =0AMy splitter h as about an 18=9D cord that runs from the socket to the splitter.=C2 - The splitter sits under the passenger seat and the cords to various dev ices are taped to the side of the console so that passengers don=99t get tangled up in them.=C2- None of the cords go with me when I leave the plane.=C2- =0A=C2-=0ADan Schmitz=0ATiger 4518B=0AKASH=0A=C2-=0AI hav e an Aera 550, an Ipad and a portable Intercom which all need power from th e cigarette lighter. =C2-Has anyone installed multiple power outlets, whe re the existing outlet is? I currently use a three outlet adapter which kee ================


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:00:06 PM PST US
    Subject: Aileron Counter Balance Weight
    From: 923te <923te@att.net>
    Anybody here know why the Tiger Aileron Counter Balance Weight has to hang out the bottom of the wingtip? What a draggy piece of engineering. Was there some design reason for that or was it just an oops? Also why 3-lbs on a 6" tube instead of 1.5-lbs on a 12" tube? Looks like either of those lengths would fit inside the wingtip if the holes had been drilled in the "right" place..... Ned


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:47:00 PM PST US
    From: n76lima@mindspring.com
    Subject: Re: Aileron Counter Balance Weight
    >Anybody here know why the Tiger Aileron Counter Balance Weight has to hang out the bottom of the wingtip? >What a draggy piece of engineering. Was there some design reason for that or was it just an oops? >Also why 3-lbs on a 6" tube instead of 1.5-lbs on a 12" tube? >Looks like either of those lengths would fit inside the wingtip if the holes had been drilled in the "right" place..... >Ned The counterweight doesn't hang out in the slipstream except when the aileron is deflected UP. If yours is not flush to ~3/8" inside the tip when the aileron is centered in the trail position, then Tiger LLC screwed up (again) and mis-drilled your aileron counterweight holes in the torque tube. This is actually a fairly common rigging failure, that is seen across American, Grumman, Gulfstream, AGAC AND Tiger LLC. Kinda like how they didn't get the elevator halves aligned when they were drilled into the control horn... another common factory screw up that seriously messes up the rigging. I've fixed dozens of them. It messes up the stop geometry because one of the bolts that holds the aileron counterweight on is also the moving part of the aileron stop assembly. If it is clocked wrong, then it hits the stop too soon one way and too late the other. Back to the story... When the aileron goes UP the opposite one is going down. Remember your PPL training? This causes ADVERSE YAW that you must counter with the rudder. By having the weight come out of the wing tip and into the slip stream, it creates some drag on the down going wing, helping to decrease the adverse yaw from the opposite aileron. Its not a bug, its a feature. ;-) As for the length of the arm and the amount of the weight, a longer arm would have required a larger, stiffer tube to support it. I wasn't there for the planning meeting, but a lot of little compromises were made, and perhaps this was one of them, where they gave up the weight increase to have a drag DECREASE due to the smaller hole in the bottom of the wing tip??? --Bob Steward Birmingham, AL


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:22:54 PM PST US
    From: 923te <923te@att.net>
    Subject: Re: Aileron Counter Balance Weight
    So if my counterweight didn't go out the bottom of the wingtip then I might have to pick my feet up off the floor once in a while??? Hmmm On Sep 26, 2012, at 9:46 PM, n76lima@mindspring.com wrote: > >> Anybody here know why the Tiger Aileron Counter Balance Weight has to hang out the bottom of the wingtip? >> What a draggy piece of engineering. Was there some design reason for that or was it just an oops? >> Also why 3-lbs on a 6" tube instead of 1.5-lbs on a 12" tube? >> Looks like either of those lengths would fit inside the wingtip if the holes had been drilled in the "right" place..... >> Ned > > The counterweight doesn't hang out in the slipstream except when the aileron is deflected UP. > > If yours is not flush to ~3/8" inside the tip when the aileron is centered in the trail position, then Tiger LLC screwed up (again) and mis-drilled your aileron counterweight holes in the torque tube. This is actually a fairly common rigging failure, that is seen across American, Grumman, Gulfstream, AGAC AND Tiger LLC. Kinda like how they didn't get the elevator halves aligned when they were drilled into the control horn... another common factory screw up that seriously messes up the rigging. I've fixed dozens of them. It messes up the stop geometry because one of the bolts that holds the aileron counterweight on is also the moving part of the aileron stop assembly. If it is clocked wrong, then it hits the stop too soon one way and too late the other. > > Back to the story... > > When the aileron goes UP the opposite one is going down. Remember your PPL training? This causes ADVERSE YAW that you must counter with the rudder. > > By having the weight come out of the wing tip and into the slip stream, it creates some drag on the down going wing, helping to decrease the adverse yaw from the opposite aileron. Its not a bug, its a feature. ;-) > > As for the length of the arm and the amount of the weight, a longer arm would have required a larger, stiffer tube to support it. > I wasn't there for the planning meeting, but a lot of little compromises were made, and perhaps this was one of them, where they gave up the weight increase to have a drag DECREASE due to the smaller hole in the bottom of the wing tip??? > > --Bob Steward > Birmingham, AL > > > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   teamgrumman-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/TeamGrumman-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/teamgrumman-list
  • Browse TeamGrumman-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/teamgrumman-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --