Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 07:37 AM - Re: Garmin stack (cannuck)
2. 07:57 AM - Re: Re: Garmin stack (923te@att.net)
3. 10:10 AM - Re: Re: Garmin stack (923te@att.net)
4. 02:39 PM - Another plane fresh from an annual . . page 1 (Gary L Vogt)
5. 02:42 PM - page 2, not my annual, someone else's. (Gary L Vogt)
6. 02:43 PM - sending unit (Gary L Vogt)
7. 03:41 PM - Re: Garmin stack (cannuck)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Garmin stack |
thornytoo1(at)hughes.net wrote:
> The little horizon is a "Sam" by Mid-Continent Instruments. It is strictly a
backup instrument in case of loss of the G500, as it has it's own battery. The
reason I had to keep the turn coordinator is because when I get an autopilot
installed it will need to go in that hole and uses the turn coordinator data.
As of now I have no autopilot installed. Maybe next year after my bank account
recovers a bit!! Thank you for the compliments.
>
> --
Obviously, your avionics supplier has a very good understanding of what does what,
and what plays well with others. Just thought you might be interested in
this Aviation Consumer article - that pretty much precludes going with STec if
you want simplest interface with G500.
http://dealers.aspenavionics.com/pdfs/Aviation-Consumer-Aspen-Garmin-Glass_0511.pdf
Thanks for identifying "Sam". At 10 Gs a pop, not exactly for the faint of heart,
but what a fantastic bit of kit for someone serious about avioncs and backup!!!
--------
AA1 and AA5B former (future?) owner
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=411523#411523
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Garmin stack |
I would question this thesis of an interface problem between G/500 and STEC as
the article is from a pro Aspen view.
On Oct 27, 2013, at 9:37 AM, "cannuck" <pmdolan@sasktel.net> wrote:
thornytoo1(at)hughes.net wrote:
> The little horizon is a "Sam" by Mid-Continent Instruments. It is strictly a
backup instrument in case of loss of the G500, as it has it's own battery. The
reason I had to keep the turn coordinator is because when I get an autopilot
installed it will need to go in that hole and uses the turn coordinator data.
As of now I have no autopilot installed. Maybe next year after my bank account
recovers a bit!! Thank you for the compliments.
>
> --
Obviously, your avionics supplier has a very good understanding of what does what,
and what plays well with others. Just thought you might be interested in
this Aviation Consumer article - that pretty much precludes going with STec if
you want simplest interface with G500.
http://dealers.aspenavionics.com/pdfs/Aviation-Consumer-Aspen-Garmin-Glass_0511.pdf
Thanks for identifying "Sam". At 10 Gs a pop, not exactly for the faint of heart,
but what a fantastic bit of kit for someone serious about avioncs and backup!!!
--------
AA1 and AA5B former (future?) owner
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=411523#411523
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Garmin stack |
Here is another Tiger equipped with a G-500 AND interfaced with an STEC 30 t
hat I understand work quite well together.
Also has an MT Prop
Makes me drool;)
On Oct 27, 2013, at 9:56 AM, 923te@att.net wrote:
I would question this thesis of an interface problem between G/500 and STEC a
s the article is from a pro Aspen view.
On Oct 27, 2013, at 9:37 AM, "cannuck" <pmdolan@sasktel.net> wrote:
thornytoo1(at)hughes.net wrote:
> The little horizon is a "Sam" by Mid-Continent Instruments. It is strictl
y a backup instrument in case of loss of the G500, as it has it's own batter
y. The reason I had to keep the turn coordinator is because when I get an a
utopilot installed it will need to go in that hole and uses the turn coordin
ator data. As of now I have no autopilot installed. Maybe next year after m
y bank account recovers a bit!! Thank you for the compliments.
>
> --
Obviously, your avionics supplier has a very good understanding of what does
what, and what plays well with others. Just thought you might be intereste
d in this Aviation Consumer article - that pretty much precludes going with S
Tec if you want simplest interface with G500.
http://dealers.aspenavionics.com/pdfs/Aviation-Consumer-Aspen-Garmin-Glass_0
511.pdf
Thanks for identifying "Sam". At 10 Gs a pop, not exactly for the faint of h
eart, but what a fantastic bit of kit for someone serious about avioncs and b
ackup!!!
--------
AA1 and AA5B former (future?) owner
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=411523#411523
==========================
========
==========================
========
==========================
========
==========================
========
<pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier">
</b></font></pre></body></html>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Another plane fresh from an annual . . page 1 |
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | page 2, not my annual, someone else's. |
Nice baffles. -Notice the oil cooler mount. -Not even close.
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
ever have to install a sending unit and swear a lot? -This helps.
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Garmin stack |
Discover:
WOW, that is another stunning display of neat hardware. This time with the full
blown 930 instead of 900, but the SAM trumps the lot for going all of the way.
I did go back and read the AC article more carefully, and it does indeed have a
definite bias, but I believe based on the cost/benefit to those who might not
have the full set of Garmin radio gear to run a G500.
The autopilot deal is not that it won't communicate, but that it can not be in
full command of the servos without retaining the autopilot's gyro reference system
instead of direct output from the G500 AHRS. The 1000 won't do that either
(but IIRC WILL with Century). Also, I think the G500 needs a card to send
to STec autopilot???
--------
AA1 and AA5B former (future?) owner
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=411552#411552
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|