Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 09:13 AM - Re: Engines (Richard)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hmmm... 9's..... That explains it! :):)
Richard
Sent from my ipad
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 2:03 AM, "Gary L Vogt" <teamgrumman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Well, since I worked the P&W, I'm partial to P&W. The guys on the other si
de of the office working GE, liked GE.
>
> Low altitudes, the P&W out performed the GE due to the larger inlet. GE ha
d smaller inlets and less spillage drag at altitude making it a bit faster.
>
> I have 12 hours in an F-16 including 3 hrs in air-to-air combat. We did 9g
s. I flew 8 point rolls and terrain following through the Sierras in the Isa
bella MOA at 400 AGL.
>
> It was a great experience.
>
> Gary
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Feb 26, 2014, at 11:30 AM, "L. Bruce Smith" <haveblue1@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>> Gary,
>>
>> Based upon your experience with the F-16, who makes better jet engines, P
ratt & Whitney or GE? I'm assuming here that you have experience with both.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Bruce Smith
>> Sent from iCloud
>
>
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|