Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:41 AM - Re: Gravel runways (FLYaDIVE)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Gravel runways |
Good point Linn.
And you have to consider Bush Planes. Most are tail draggers, their tail
is even closer to the ground than ours, many are fabric so, why aren't they
destroyed? It could also be that the Grumman owners used a lot of throttle
during taxi and that kicked up the stones at a higher velocity. So, how do
the tail draggers taxi? Well, they have their nose higher into the air and
much more ground clearance. Which brings up the next question... What
does the Grumman's prop look like?
Barry
"Chop'd Liver"
Check 6
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Linn Walters <flying-nut@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
> Color me skeptical ..... I doubt that gravel could be flung up with
> enough force to actually penetrate the skin. Me thinks something else did
> the damage. Look at all the gravel that's been kicked up that only puts
> small dents in the leading edge .....
> Linn
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|