Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:20 AM - Official Usage Guideline [Please Read] [Monthly Posting] (Matt Dralle)
2. 05:13 AM - Re: Component ideas? (Justin Baron)
3. 05:43 AM - Re: XDP4000X-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 06/01/04 (One Park)
4. 10:15 AM - Re: Component ideas? (NOTGSXR@aol.com)
5. 11:26 AM - Re: Re: XDP4000X-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 06/01/04 (Scott Thibault)
6. 04:36 PM - Re: Component ideas? (Bobby Braun)
7. 05:07 PM - Re: Component ideas? (DJholl98@aol.com)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Official Usage Guideline [Please Read] [Monthly Posting] |
DNA: do not archive
--> XDP4000X-List message posted by: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com>
Dear Lister,
Please read over the XDP4000X-List Usage Guidelines below. The complete
XDP4000X-List FAQ including these Usage Guidelines can be found at the
following URL:
http://www.matronics.com/FAQs/XDP4000X-List.FAQ.html
Thank you,
Matt Dralle
Matronics Email List Administrator
******************************************************************************
XDP4000X-List Usage Guidelines
******************************************************************************
The following details the official Usage Guidelines for the XDP4000X-List.
You are encouraged to read it carefully, and to abide by the rules therein.
Failure to use the XDP4000X-List in the manner described below may result
in the removal of the subscribers from the List.
XDP4000X-List Policy Statement
The purpose of the XDP4000X-List is to provide a forum of discussion for
things related to this particular discussion group. The List's goals
are to serve as an information resource to its members; to deliver
high-quality content; to provide moral support; to foster camaraderie
among its members; and to support safe operation. Reaching these goals
requires the participation and cooperation of each and every member of
the List. To this end, the following guidelines have been established:
- Please keep all posts related to the List at some level. Do not submit
posts concerning computer viruses, urban legends, random humor, long
lost buddies' phone numbers, etc. etc.
- THINK carefully before you write. Ask yourself if your post will be
relevant to everyone. If you have to wonder about that, DON'T send it.
- Remember that your post will be included for posterity in an archive
that is growing in size at an extraordinary rate. Try to be concise and
terse in your posts. Avoid overly wordy and lengthy posts and
responses.
- Keep your signature brief. Please include your name, email address,
aircraft type/tail number, and geographic location. A short line
about where you are in the building process is also nice. Avoid
bulky signatures with character graphics; they consume unnecessary
space in the archive.
- DON'T post requests to the List for information when that info is
easily obtainable from other widely available sources. Consult the
web page or FAQ first.
- If you want to respond to a post, DO keep the "Subject:" line of
your response the same as that of the original post. This makes it
easy to find threads in the archive.
- When responding, NEVER quote the *entire* original post in your
response. DO use lines from the original post to help "tune in" the
reader to the topic at hand, but be selective. The impact that
quoting the entire original post has on the size of the archive
can not be overstated!
- When the poster asks you to respond to him/her personally, DO NOT
then go ahead and reply to the List. Be aware that clicking the
"reply" button on your mail package does not necessarily send your
response to the original poster. You might have to actively address
your response with the original poster's email address.
- DO NOT use the List to respond to a post unless you have something
to add that is relevant and has a broad appeal. "Way to go!", "I
agree", and "Congratulations" are all responses that are better sent
to the original poster directly, rather than to the List at large.
- When responding to others' posts, avoid the feeling that you need to
comment on every last point in their posts, unless you can truly
contribute something valuable.
- Feel free to disagree with other viewpoints, BUT keep your tone
polite and respectful. Don't make snide comments, personally attack
other listers, or take the moral high ground on an obviously
controversial issue. This will only cause a pointless debate that
will hurt feelings, waste bandwidth and resolve nothing.
-------
[This is an automated posting.]
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Component ideas? |
--> XDP4000X-List message posted by: Justin Baron <justinjbaron@comcast.net>
Hey Bobby,
A lot of people like the PG components - the drivers are made by
Morel. You could either get just the 5.25 set or go for their 3-way which
includes a shallow mount 9" midbass driver.
Focal has a Polyglass set that is 10-5-tweet.
Not sure of any deals, but these are all nice drivers. Or the BA Z5 is
really smooth, but not cheap at all.
Take care
Justin
At 10:05 PM 5/31/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>--> XDP4000X-List message posted by: "Bobby Braun" <bobbybraun@comcast.net>
>
>I'm thinking of replacing the front components in my car, and am in the
>market for something that'd fit in a stock 5 1/4" component speaker slot.
>Tweeter mount isn't an issue or concern, but the 5.25 speaker is as big as I
>may go in this install. Any opinions on what'd match well with the 4000x's
>crossover selection and overall quality? Also, any deals out there that you
>guys know of? What do you all think?
>
>Bobby
>
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | RE: XDP4000X-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 06/01/04 |
--> XDP4000X-List message posted by: "One Park" <paikiah@hotmail.com>
>I'm not necessarily on a 'budget' just looking for a deal if at all
>possible. I didn't shell out all the $$ I did for my c90 and 4000x so that
>I would have to cut myself short on the speakers. It's just time to
>upgrade, and really, I'm willing to spend just about anything. Just have to
>keep it in the 5.25" range due to the install. Was thinking about the
>Focal Utopia line, but I remember a while ago someone mentioned the T47
>tweeter was better than their newer line T51, and that's held me back from
>going that route. What do you all think. Ha ha, is there anyone even out
>there that still owns the 4000x, maybe this forum's dead?
>
If not on a budget, then mya I steer you to what I use, the dynaudio. I
curently use a 6.5", but I'm sure dyn offers a 5 and quart inch mids.
If you want purchase separate raw drivers, may I suggest skanning's
offering? They sound a whole lot better than my 240's, and I'm thinking
about upgrading to those in the near future.
BTW, no, I don't own a 4000x, I use the good ol' 210EQ instead. :)
One
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Component ideas? |
--> XDP4000X-List message posted by: NOTGSXR@aol.com
In a message dated 6/2/04 8:13:55 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
justinjbaron@comcast.net writes:
Hey Bobby,
A lot of people like the PG components - the drivers are made by
Morel. You could either get just the 5.25 set or go for their 3-way which
includes a shallow mount 9" midbass driver.
Focal has a Polyglass set that is 10-5-tweet.
Not sure of any deals, but these are all nice drivers. Or the BA Z5 is
really smooth, but not cheap at all.
Take care
Justin
Another note on the Boston Z's..... They really need like 300-450 watts to
wake up :)
Dan
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: RE: XDP4000X-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 06/01/04 |
--> XDP4000X-List message posted by: Scott Thibault <tbone7467@yahoo.com>
what about the refernce speakers that sony sold a while back?? you can still find
sellers on line for those
One Park <paikiah@hotmail.com> wrote:--> XDP4000X-List message posted by: "One
Park"
>I'm not necessarily on a 'budget' just looking for a deal if at all
>possible. I didn't shell out all the $$ I did for my c90 and 4000x so that
>I would have to cut myself short on the speakers. It's just time to
>upgrade, and really, I'm willing to spend just about anything. Just have to
>keep it in the 5.25" range due to the install. Was thinking about the
>Focal Utopia line, but I remember a while ago someone mentioned the T47
>tweeter was better than their newer line T51, and that's held me back from
>going that route. What do you all think. Ha ha, is there anyone even out
>there that still owns the 4000x, maybe this forum's dead?
>
If not on a budget, then mya I steer you to what I use, the dynaudio. I
curently use a 6.5", but I'm sure dyn offers a 5 and quart inch mids.
If you want purchase separate raw drivers, may I suggest skanning's
offering? They sound a whole lot better than my 240's, and I'm thinking
about upgrading to those in the near future.
BTW, no, I don't own a 4000x, I use the good ol' 210EQ instead. :)
One
---------------------------------
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Component ideas? |
--> XDP4000X-List message posted by: "Bobby Braun" <bobbybraun@comcast.net>
I actually own all PG amps, but have been quite skeptical about the quality
of their components since I've only known them as an amp manufacturer.
Honestly, if you guys think the quality of the PG components are there I
might go that route, before this I was leaning the direction of Focal.
Bobby
----- Original Message -----
From: <NOTGSXR@aol.com>
Subject: Re: XDP4000X-List: Component ideas?
> --> XDP4000X-List message posted by: NOTGSXR@aol.com
>
> In a message dated 6/2/04 8:13:55 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> justinjbaron@comcast.net writes:
>
> Hey Bobby,
>
> A lot of people like the PG components - the drivers are made by
> Morel. You could either get just the 5.25 set or go for their 3-way
which
> includes a shallow mount 9" midbass driver.
>
> Focal has a Polyglass set that is 10-5-tweet.
>
> Not sure of any deals, but these are all nice drivers. Or the BA Z5 is
> really smooth, but not cheap at all.
>
> Take care
>
> Justin
>
> Another note on the Boston Z's..... They really need like 300-450 watts to
> wake up :)
>
> Dan
>
>
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Component ideas? |
--> XDP4000X-List message posted by: DJholl98@aol.com
i heard PG's top of the line components in a store display about 7 years ago
and i wasn't at all impressed, they seemed very harsh. from the reviews i have
seen focal, dynaudio, and A/D/S seem to be popular.
Dave
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|