XDP4000X-List Digest Archive

Mon 08/16/04


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:45 AM - Re: Midbass drivers and general questions. (Randy Visentine)
     2. 06:33 AM - Bye bye C90/4000X (Mr. Z)
     3. 12:01 PM - Re: Bye bye C90/4000X (Randy Visentine)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:45:10 AM PST US
    From: Randy Visentine <randyman@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Midbass drivers and general questions.
    --> XDP4000X-List message posted by: Randy Visentine <randyman@gmail.com> Hey Dan! I still have not completed my door panels for the Vifa 8.75" mid-bass. I am going to experiment with those B&G Planars (what a coincidence) - but try the Neo 8 PDR as a mid/tweet. I'm going to try and squeeze 500Hz out of them, and let them run all the way out to 20K. Considering the close proximity and good sensitivity, I think they might handle it. I'm going to try and fit them in the A-Pillars - as low as they will sit. Running those Vifa 8.75"s to 500Hz or so should not be an issue, as they are used as a true "woofer" in the 2-Way reference monitor they were designed for. I'm just worried about still having a sizable span from the Woofer at 500Hz in the door, to the mid/tweet about 2' or so away on the a-pillar. I may just do a small 4" cone mid down to 250Hz, and do a bi-amped 2-way 4"+1" pod on each a-pillar. I'll have to experiment, and see. That's the fun part IMO. IF you can track down those Vifa's, the model # on the driver is:490-001-00 ("703"?). A nice 4 Ohm driver FWIW. Enjoy, all... Randy V.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:33:44 AM PST US
    From: "Mr. Z" <dremgragen@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Bye bye C90/4000X
    --> XDP4000X-List message posted by: "Mr. Z" <dremgragen@hotmail.com> So after having the Clarion DRZ9255 in my car for almost a month (two+ years of 4000X, two weeks of A/B with the 9255, and 1 week of exclusively 9255), I've concluded that the new 9255 is better than the 4000X. The main differences are: The Clarion has better high frequency reproduction. The 4000X sounds dark and less defined in the 10kHz+ range in comparison. The decay is faster with the Clarion which is either bad or good depending on listener preference. I like the slower decay myself, but my friend loved the faster. She said, "It makes the instruments feel more separate, making it easier to pinpoint their location." I kinda see her point, but still prefer the slower decay. After removing the 4000X and just having the 9255 I've decided it's not a big enough deal for me to continue complaining about; it sounds damn fine regardless. The Clarion saves space. The Clarion can be read during the day unlike the C90. The Clarion looks and feels sexier to use (completely subjective one there :) ). 9255 = the new hotness 4000X = oldie but goodie It's been fun, but I'm saying goodbye to my 4000X. -Brody Z.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:01:46 PM PST US
    From: Randy Visentine <randyman@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Bye bye C90/4000X
    --> XDP4000X-List message posted by: Randy Visentine <randyman@gmail.com> Brody, Can you give your opinions on the EQ and Crossover functionality/sound? What are its limitations? What about the user interface - easy to navigate? No PC/Laptop requiremants must be a plus. I think I know what you mean with the "darker" sound of the Sony - I think of it as more of a "Smothness with detail" that is really hard to acheive without being harsh. I still have not heard a HU that touches the XDP4K on the "relaxed detail" of the highs. This clarion may be the one to do it, though. I know others have even said the Alpine F-1 setup is not as nice on the treble as the XDP4K (I'm not suprised). From "Bright" to "Harsh" is not a big stretch (Alpine), but "Smooth" will always be "Smooth" (XDP). Let us know on the Crossover and EQ... Randy V.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   xdp4000x-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/XDP4000X-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/xdp4000x-list
  • Browse XDP4000X-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/xdp4000x-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --