Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:07 AM - Re: Vote (Dr. Robert Schroeder)
2. 06:52 AM - Re: mags (Janet)
3. 07:13 AM - Vote to help a fellow YAK PILOT (Mark Schrick)
4. 07:25 AM - Re: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please vote this weekend soon!!!! (Ronald Kalemba)
5. 07:55 AM - Re: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please vote (Brian Lloyd)
6. 08:14 AM - Re: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please (Richard Basiliere)
7. 08:47 AM - Re: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please (Brian Lloyd)
8. 08:58 AM - Re: Vote to help a fellow YAK PILOT (Walt Fricke)
9. 09:38 AM - Re: Vote to help a fellow YAK PILOT (William Halverson)
10. 09:42 AM - mags, (cjpilot710@aol.com)
11. 09:51 AM - Re: Vote to help a fellow YAK PILOT (Brian Lloyd)
12. 10:19 AM - Re: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please (Roy O. Wright)
13. 10:40 AM - Re: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please (Brian Lloyd)
14. 10:40 AM - Vote to help a fellow YAK PILOT (Response from the Pilot) (Mark Schrick)
15. 12:32 PM - Air compressors (Doug)
16. 05:05 PM - Re: Air compressors (brian olofsson)
17. 05:24 PM - Re: Air compressors (Jim Selby)
18. 05:51 PM - Compressor (jay reiter)
19. 06:07 PM - Re: Air compressors (Doug)
20. 06:16 PM - Re: Air compressors (Ernie)
Message 1
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Dr. Robert Schroeder" <firedog@visi.com>
Please repost the address for the voting...
I was out of the country and lost it.
Thanks, Robert Schroeder
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Vote
--> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
Barry Hancock wrote:
> --> Yak-List message posted by: Barry Hancock <radialpower@cox.net>
>
> Well, just voted this morning and it's up to 84% YES. Well done,
> gang. City Councils never cease to amaze me....
I must have missed something. What are we voting on?
--
Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201
brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802
+1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Janet" <talewis@attbi.com>
Jim ,
I would next try Sams sugestion about switching the mags.
If you still have a left mag problem after the change
then I would look at the mag switches. I had a problem with the front mag
switch caused
by the case being tightened so much that a post inside was sometimes
contacting the case.
Good Luck
Terry Lewis
----- Original Message -----
From: <cjpilot710@aol.com>
Subject: Yak-List: mags
> --> Yak-List message posted by: cjpilot710@aol.com
>
> The last couple of weeks I have been batting my brains against a mag
problem.
> I put two overhauled mags, on my M-14p. The runup check was fine.
> I made a :30 flight and when I returned, I had a 200 rpm drop on the right
> mag.
> To this point I have replaced all the plugs with news one.
> I have changed ALL the plug wires.
> I've check the timing 4 times.
> The gap is OK.
> I check and adjusted valve clearances (only 3 had to be adjusted very
little)
>
> I still have the 200 to 220 rpm drop on the same mag.
>
> Jim
>
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety,
> deserve neither liberty nor safety"
> Benjamin Franklin 1759
> "With my shield, or on it"
> Trojan Warriors BC
>
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Vote to help a fellow YAK PILOT |
--> Yak-List message posted by: Mark Schrick <schrick@pacbell.net>
> http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?brd=1134 VOTE "YES" scroll down
left
> side to poll box
The YAK Pilot Group has showed up in FULL FORCE!!!! Great job. The pilot
(Larry Schlasinger) has been overwhelmed with OUR support and is in "AH" of
the effort this group put out over the weekend. The voting continues for one
week. Keep checking back to make sure no one does the same counter attack.
Mark Schrick
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Dr. Robert
Schroeder
Subject: RE: Yak-List: Vote
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Dr. Robert Schroeder" <firedog@visi.com>
Please repost the address for the voting...
I was out of the country and lost it.
Thanks, Robert Schroeder
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Vote
--> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
Barry Hancock wrote:
> --> Yak-List message posted by: Barry Hancock <radialpower@cox.net>
>
> Well, just voted this morning and it's up to 84% YES. Well done,
> gang. City Councils never cease to amaze me....
I must have missed something. What are we voting on?
--
Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201
brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802
+1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please vote this |
weekend soon!!!!
--> Yak-List message posted by: Ronald Kalemba <emu21@sbcglobal.net>
Mark,
He's got my yes vote from Illinois.
Sincerely,
Ron Kalemba
CJ6A - Cary, ILL.
Mark Schrick <schrick@pacbell.net> wrote:--> Yak-List message posted by: Mark
Schrick
You guys are the BEST GROUP IN AVIATION!!!!!! You can vote once per day so
it is helping him. As several of you have stated, This could be us next!!!!!
Keep up the GREAT JOB and I am very proud of this group and proud to be a
member!!!
Mark "SHREK" Schrick
Yak 52
San Jose, Ca
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Janet
Subject: Re: Yak-List: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please
vote this weekendsoon!!!!
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Janet"
Mark,
Have you checked the votes lately?
Evidently the Yak pilots can make a
big difference when they work together.
Terry Lewis
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Schrick
Subject: Yak-List: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please vote this
weekendsoon!!!!
> --> Yak-List message posted by: Mark Schrick
>
> Larry is the MT representative that helped REDSTAR last year by offering a
> discount on new MTV-9 (3 blade) props. He is a large supporter of YPA and
> currently owns a 1996 Yak 52. Please go to the site and scroll down the
left
> side to vote "YES" so he can retain his acrobatic box. Pass this message
to
> other to help the vote.
>
> http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?brd=1134 VOTE "YES" scroll down
left
> side to poll box
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Schlasinger [mailto:mtprop@hotmail.com]
> To: schrick@pacbell.net
> Subject: Re: FW: Shipping label MT PROPELLER.
>
>
> Hi Mark,
> You can do me a big favor. Our local paper the "Chetek Alert" is running a
> poll on whether or not I should get my aerobatic box renewed. PLEASE put
> the Chetek Alert in goggle and go to the website and vote YES in the poll
> and PLEASE see if you can find anyone else to do so...one vote/computer.
I'm
> forwarding my letter to refute the article on the airport manager...
>
> http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?brd=1134 VOTE "YES"
>
> Thanks so much
>
> Larry
>
>
> February 20, 2003
>
> To: the Chetek Alert
>
> From: Larry Schlasinger
>
> Im presently out of the country, but I was made aware of the article in
the
> Alert and controversy regarding my aerobatic box and aerobatic flying. It
is
> unfortunate that the situation has gotten so far out of hand and that
there
> has been so much time wasted in dealing with such a simple matter. The
> entire problem comes down to the fact that Gene Buffington and Todd
Kirkman
> (Genes good friend) dont like me. This dislike is easy to understand if
one
> knows all the facts. First, Todd and I used to be friends. I dealt with
Todd
> in business (since we are both in the aviation business) and also as a
> personal friend. Todd has his own way of doing business but since we are
all
> a bit different, I overlooked many of Todds unusual business practices.
> Todd originally supported my aerobatic flying and actually had me teach
him
> to fly aerobatics in his Russian Yak. My relationship with Todd fell apart
> when I assisted the Washburn County Sheriffs Department in an airplane
> burglary investigation. The evidence gained during this investigation led
> directly to Todd and he was eventually arrested for the crime, as reported
> in the Chetek Alert some time ago. Todd blamed me for his arrest, and is
now
> doing anything he can to inconvenience and discredit me. I cant change the
> fact he was involved in this action and I refused to do anything other
than
> what was proper at the time, regardless of the fact we had been friends.
>
> The story with Gene is something different. Gene has been involved with
> aviation for much longer than I have and to listen to him you would think
> that he knows much more than I do (and everyone else). He was (and still
is)
> the commanding force that rules the Chetek Airport (regardless of the
> committee structure in place) and most of the people in Chetek consider
him
> an expert and let him have his way. When I came to Chetek, I found that
Gene
> controlled everything at the airport and if I wanted anything done Id need
> to have his approval, which meant that I needed to acknowledge that he was
> the commander and the airport expert. The problem was that Gene is not an
> expert in General aviation. He has absolutely no training or experience in
> airport management. Gene was an airline captain, which, with the
assistance
> of an enormous company, he flew a plane. No business experience,
management
> experience or people skills. This was confirmed by the State Of Wisconsin
> DOT telling me that they had tried many times to get Gene to attend
airport
> management classes and he always thought that for him this was
unnecessary.
> Gene has claimed that my aerobatic flying is unsafe and my area is unsafe.
> It appears that Gene thinks he knows more than the experts at the State of
> Wisconsin Department of Aeronautics and also the Federal Aviation
> Administration. BOTH of these agencies have PERSONALLY inspected and
> APPROVED my flying and my area (I hold a special license that allows me to
> fly aerobatics to ground level and Gene has no such license or
experience).
> The State DOT actually came to our airport committee meeting and told Gene
> that everything was safe. Gene didn'tt accept this answer and amazingly
> called the director of the DOA and told him that the inspector that had
come
> to our meeting had done a bad job and Gene wanted it said that my
aerobatic
> box was unsafe. Naturally this didn'tt happen. It was confirmed again, in
> writing and drawings, that there was absolutely no overlap or conflict or
> safety issue.
> Gene has made many, many mistakes at the airport and has always blamed
> others for these mistakes. He has taken the best hangar spot for himself,
> chosen to build his hangar higher than the neighbors hangars (contrary to
> the State of Wisconsin engineers recommendation) so the neighbor has a
> drainage problem, taken the neighbors black dirt for his own landscaping,
> complained about the noise of my Cessna 185 (which I flew from the Chetek
> Airport very seldom as I normally kept it at my home airport) and then
> bought his own 185, producing exactly the same noise as my 185, and
> proceeded to do practice takeoffs & landings making more noise in one day
> than I made in a month. Gene also falsified the airport committee records
> in August of 2002, indicating that the Airport committee had voted and
> passed a motion to write a letter to the FAA to close down my aerobatic
box.
> There was no such vote (confirmed by the two members of the committee in
> favor of my aerobatic flying). Never the less, Gene made up the minutes to
> indicate that there was and went ahead and wrote the letter to the FAA
> without the authority to do so. The list of Genes mistakes goes on and on.
> The reason he has such a problem with me is that I call a spade a spade
and
> always let him know what I think of his poor decisions and abilities and
> that I call him on his numerous mistakes and selfish endeavors. Gene takes
> this personally and is doing anything in his power to take away what he
> perceives as something important to me. He even cancelled the 4th of July
> airshow that I had been doing as my contribution (absolutely no charge)
for
> the people of Chetek and Hydroflites Ski Team, because we didn'tt make him
> the Airshow co-coordinator or ask his permission in the first place. Id
> have been very happy to have him help, but he had no interest and only
> complained about the show.
> Some time ago, I was informed by Judy Reichert, that she, after hearing
> about Genes attempt to shut me down, had started a petition to show that
my
> neighbors supported my aerobatic flying, my airshow and aerobatic box. I
had
> absolutely NOTHING to do with starting or pushing this petition, it was
done
> without my knowledge. The Chetek Town Board, as well as many others,
> willingly signed this petition. Naturally I was very happy to have had
this
> done. Over the years Ive been flying aerobatics and the airshow, Ive had
> many, many people comment how much they enjoy the flying and this year on
> how many were disappointed in not having the show for the 4th. Ive
recently
> been made aware that Gene started HIS OWN petition and has been calling
all
> my neighbors himself, looking for people against my flying. Im sure he can
> find some if he really tries, but why not have a real vote among ALL the
> people of the area and see what everyone thinks. Ill be happy to make Gene
> a deal. If there is such a vote and I loose, Ill move my aerobatic flying
> elsewhere and never do another airshow in Chetek. On the other hand, if
the
> people vote to keep me flying and doing the airshow, then how about Gene
> stepping down from any and all forms of airport management and let someone
> replace him that will do the airport and the community of Chetek some good
> and quit using a city office to forward a personal vendetta.
>
>
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please vote |
this weekend soon!!!!
--> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
Uh, why does Larry need anything from his city council? Federal preemption
prevents local municipalities from overriding federal jurisdiction and
regulation. As long as he performs his aerobatics above 1500' thus not
requiring a wavier from the FAA, why get involved with the city council at all?
Or does he need a low-level aerobatic box? Still, I would think that this would
be purely an FAA issue and not local city council.
Voting on this might feel good but it also might lead the city council into
thinking that they actually have jurisdiction, a bad thing that could lead us
down into rampant regulatory inconsistencies across the country.
I think that Larry needs to talk to the EAA and AOPA for assistance in this area.
Something to think about.
--
Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201
brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802
+1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please |
votethis weekend soon!!!!
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Richard Basiliere" <BasiliereR@ci.boulder.co.us>
I think I can tell you why. From the People's Republic of Boulder... a
few years ago the PRB stopped, fined, and forced into Court a fellow
pilot who's only "violation" was to fly banners legally over Folsom
Field (University of Colorado's football field) to advertise for his
clients. It took the FAA filing a "friend of the Court" brief to let
the PRB know in no uncertain terms that the air they breath belongs to
the FAA and the pilot has the right to do what he was doing. So, after
years of unimaginable hassles and untold attorney costs he was once
again allowed to engage in his vocation. From what I've seen City
Councils get on their power trips and "I'm the Daddy and I say so." is
all too often their shoot from the hip answer with no background
investigation at all.
Respectfully, Rick
>>> brian@lloyd.com 02/24/03 08:55AM >>>
--> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
Uh, why does Larry need anything from his city council? Federal
preemption
prevents local municipalities from overriding federal jurisdiction and
regulation. As long as he performs his aerobatics above 1500' thus not
requiring a wavier from the FAA, why get involved with the city council
at all?
Or does he need a low-level aerobatic box? Still, I would think that
this would
be purely an FAA issue and not local city council.
Voting on this might feel good but it also might lead the city council
into
thinking that they actually have jurisdiction, a bad thing that could
lead us
down into rampant regulatory inconsistencies across the country.
I think that Larry needs to talk to the EAA and AOPA for assistance in
this area.
Something to think about.
--
Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite
201
brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802
+1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please |
votethis weekend soon!!!!
--> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
Richard Basiliere wrote:
> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Richard Basiliere" <BasiliereR@ci.boulder.co.us>
>
> I think I can tell you why. From the People's Republic of Boulder... a
> few years ago the PRB stopped, fined, and forced into Court a fellow
> pilot who's only "violation" was to fly banners legally over Folsom
> Field (University of Colorado's football field) to advertise for his
> clients. It took the FAA filing a "friend of the Court" brief to let
> the PRB know in no uncertain terms that the air they breath belongs to
> the FAA and the pilot has the right to do what he was doing. So, after
> years of unimaginable hassles and untold attorney costs he was once
> again allowed to engage in his vocation. From what I've seen City
> Councils get on their power trips and "I'm the Daddy and I say so." is
> all too often their shoot from the hip answer with no background
> investigation at all.
I agree 100%. Which is why it may need to go to a suit. Local governments can
be quite oppressive since the people involved often have no background or
undertanding of law or government. They think that just because they were
elected to sit there they can pass any law they want any way they want. Hence
someone needs to periodically point out that there are checks and balances that
ensure equal treatment under the law across the United States, even for local
jurisdictions.
More people should protest when the government, local or otherwise, oppresses
and then they should file suit to recover their costs for fighting it. You
know, failure to be aware of a law is no defense when you break a law. Too bad
politicians are not held to the same standard.
--
Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201
brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802
+1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Vote to help a fellow YAK PILOT |
--> Yak-List message posted by: Walt Fricke <walterfricke@yahoo.com>
I've known Larry for years. In fact, He was one of
the "early adapters". Took me for a ride in a Yak-52
before I knew what it was. This was 10-15 years ago.
He was also sporting one of the first Yak-50's in the
US at the time as well. He has been a great supporter
of our community. He didn't even know me and when I
admired the 52, he said "hop in" and he took me out
and let me fly the plane......of course drug dealers
use a similar tactic...
I just voted and we are "crushing" the competition at
88%!
Although I have seen Larry fly his routine very safely
and very well, I would like to have added a 25th
stipulation that the waiver not go "all the way to the
ground".
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Vote to help a fellow YAK PILOT |
--> Yak-List message posted by: William Halverson <william@netpros.net>
Maybe a fly-in to his A/P timed to allow attendance at his town council
meeting would be appropriate?
Bill [agitator] Halverson
Mark Schrick wrote:
>--> Yak-List message posted by: Mark Schrick <schrick@pacbell.net>
>
>>http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?brd=1134 VOTE "YES" scroll down
>>
>left
>
>>side to poll box
>>
>
>The YAK Pilot Group has showed up in FULL FORCE!!!! Great job. The pilot
>(Larry Schlasinger) has been overwhelmed with OUR support and is in "AH" of
>the effort this group put out over the weekend. The voting continues for one
>week. Keep checking back to make sure no one does the same counter attack.
>
>Mark Schrick
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
>[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Dr. Robert
>Schroeder
>To: yak-list@matronics.com
>Subject: RE: Yak-List: Vote
>
>
>--> Yak-List message posted by: "Dr. Robert Schroeder" <firedog@visi.com>
>
>Please repost the address for the voting...
>I was out of the country and lost it.
>Thanks, Robert Schroeder
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
>[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd
>To: yak-list@matronics.com
>Subject: Re: Yak-List: Vote
>
>
>--> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
>
>Barry Hancock wrote:
>
>>--> Yak-List message posted by: Barry Hancock <radialpower@cox.net>
>>
>>Well, just voted this morning and it's up to 84% YES. Well done,
>>gang. City Councils never cease to amaze me....
>>
>
>I must have missed something. What are we voting on?
>--
>
>Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201
>brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802
>+1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax
>
>
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: cjpilot710@aol.com
Mystery solved
I want to thank every one who contacted me off list with all kinds of helpful
suggestions.
It turns out it was the overhauled magneto after all. I took a number of
folks advice and switched mags from one side to the other. I'd had been
against this at first because I thought I'd have to reindex the mag along
with retiming them. It turns out you don't have to. When the engine is at
top dead center, the L & R mag drives are lined up the same. Timing becomes
the only consideration than.
I might have found this earlier IF I done the switch than. However I kept
finding little things wrong here and there (chafe wires, broken shielding,
stuff like that). Although this wasn't the cause of my particular problem,
they were on their way to become headaches.
So though the problem cost me a lot of frustration, and money, it was for the
best because I've dealt with a lot future problems.
Jim
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety"
Benjamin Franklin 1759
"With my shield, or on it"
Trojan Warriors BC
Message 11
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Vote to help a fellow YAK PILOT |
--> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
William Halverson wrote:
> --> Yak-List message posted by: William Halverson <william@netpros.net>
>
> Maybe a fly-in to his A/P timed to allow attendance at his town council
> meeting would be appropriate?
A frontal attack by a mob, especially a mob that doesn't vote in that
jurisdiction, doesn't usually buy you anything. You want to set it up so that
you are *going* to win and then show them how you are going to win. With few
exceptions this will get them to back down since a public bruhaha that they lose
does not look good at reelection time, especially if it cost the city/county
money. Politicians like to be seen backing a winner.
--
Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201
brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802
+1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax
Message 12
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please |
votethis weekend soon!!!!
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Roy O. Wright" <roy@wright.org>
I agree for a normal aerobatic box, but a low level box should have the
unanimous approval of land owners below.
Have fun,
Roy
At 12:47 PM 2/24/2003 -0400, Brian Lloyd wrote:
>--> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
>
>I agree 100%. Which is why it may need to go to a suit. Local governments can
>be quite oppressive since the people involved often have no background or
>undertanding of law or government. They think that just because they were
>elected to sit there they can pass any law they want any way they want. Hence
>someone needs to periodically point out that there are checks and balances that
>ensure equal treatment under the law across the United States, even for local
>jurisdictions.
>
>More people should protest when the government, local or otherwise, oppresses
>and then they should file suit to recover their costs for fighting it. You
>know, failure to be aware of a law is no defense when you break a law. Too bad
>politicians are not held to the same standard.
>
>--
',,'',,'',,',,'
Roy Wright 512.378.1234 mailto:royw@cisco.com
Cisco Systems import com.cisco.std-disclaimer
Message 13
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: A local YAK pilot needs our HELP!!!!!!! Please |
votethis weekend soon!!!!
--> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
Roy O. Wright wrote:
> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Roy O. Wright" <roy@wright.org>
>
> I agree for a normal aerobatic box, but a low level box should have the
> unanimous approval of land owners below.
Oh, I agree with that 100% also, which is why I asked the earlier question about
whether he needed a low-level box. If he doesn't need a low-level box he should
just do what he feels so long as he conforms to all the applicable FARs.
--
Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201
brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802
+1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax
Message 14
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Vote to help a fellow YAK PILOT (Response from the Pilot) |
--> Yak-List message posted by: Mark Schrick <schrick@pacbell.net>
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Schlasinger [mailto:mtprop@hotmail.com]
Subject: Re: FW: Yak-List: Vote to help a fellow YAK PILOT
Thanks Mark,
So far REALLY good. You're right about the counterattack...keep the votes
coming...tell everyone & a big thanks...You guys are the BEST!!!!!!!!
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?brd=1134 VOTE "YES" scroll down left
side of website to poll box.
Thank you VERY MUCH!!!!
Larry Schlasinger
MT Rep USA
Message 15
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Doug" <rvfltd@televar.com>
Is there anyone out there, who has in fact installed a Chinese air
compressor on a M14P or a M14P compressor on a 285 hp? Many of the guy with
M14P's are asking if I know for sure that the Chinese pump will work on the
M14P. Since I have not actually done it I cannot answer with absolute
confidence, I can only say that I "think" that it will fit up and work just
fine.
Also, Ron Lee is looking for a 28 volt Cornelius compressor, anybody got
one?
Always Yakin,
Doug Sapp
Message 16
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Air compressors |
--> Yak-List message posted by: brian olofsson <brian060901@yahoo.com>
Doug: I bought a Chinese air compressor from you a couple yrs ago and installed
it on myM14P . Worked great. The engine went bad (unrelated) a while later,
the pump was removed and reinstalled in Bob Fitzpatricks yak, he then went bad
(unrelated I hope). The air compressor however still works well. (Hi Bob)
Brian
Doug <rvfltd@televar.com> wrote:--> Yak-List message posted by: "Doug"
Is there anyone out there, who has in fact installed a Chinese air
compressor on a M14P or a M14P compressor on a 285 hp? Many of the guy with
M14P's are asking if I know for sure that the Chinese pump will work on the
M14P. Since I have not actually done it I cannot answer with absolute
confidence, I can only say that I "think" that it will fit up and work just
fine.
Also, Ron Lee is looking for a 28 volt Cornelius compressor, anybody got
one?
Always Yakin,
Doug Sapp
---------------------------------
Message 17
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Air compressors |
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Jim Selby" <alikatz@mbay.net>
Doug,
I have one 28 volt Cornelius Compressor available. I also have several
Cornelius Pumps, Military Overhauled still in the Box, very small units,
3000 psi, with Hydraulic Motors. If you need photos please contact me.
Jim Selby, Jr
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug" <rvfltd@televar.com>
Subject: Yak-List: Air compressors
> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Doug" <rvfltd@televar.com>
>
> Is there anyone out there, who has in fact installed a Chinese air
> compressor on a M14P or a M14P compressor on a 285 hp? Many of the guy
with
> M14P's are asking if I know for sure that the Chinese pump will work on
the
> M14P. Since I have not actually done it I cannot answer with absolute
> confidence, I can only say that I "think" that it will fit up and work
just
> fine.
>
> Also, Ron Lee is looking for a 28 volt Cornelius compressor, anybody got
> one?
>
>
> Always Yakin,
> Doug Sapp
>
>
Message 18
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "jay reiter" <jmreiter@adelphia.net>
Has Ron Lee tried War Bird Parts 813-968-5048 Part# G601 at $135. They advertise
them but do they have them? Worth a call? Jay
Message 19
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Air compressors |
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Doug" <rvfltd@televar.com>
Yes, send me a photo of your units. Thanks for the answer back.
Best,
Doug
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Selby" <alikatz@mbay.net>
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Air compressors
> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jim Selby" <alikatz@mbay.net>
>
> Doug,
> I have one 28 volt Cornelius Compressor available. I also have several
> Cornelius Pumps, Military Overhauled still in the Box, very small units,
> 3000 psi, with Hydraulic Motors. If you need photos please contact me.
>
> Jim Selby, Jr
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Doug" <rvfltd@televar.com>
> To: <yak-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: Yak-List: Air compressors
>
>
> > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Doug" <rvfltd@televar.com>
> >
> > Is there anyone out there, who has in fact installed a Chinese air
> > compressor on a M14P or a M14P compressor on a 285 hp? Many of the guy
> with
> > M14P's are asking if I know for sure that the Chinese pump will work on
> the
> > M14P. Since I have not actually done it I cannot answer with absolute
> > confidence, I can only say that I "think" that it will fit up and work
> just
> > fine.
> >
> > Also, Ron Lee is looking for a 28 volt Cornelius compressor, anybody got
> > one?
> >
> >
> > Always Yakin,
> > Doug Sapp
> >
> >
>
>
Message 20
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Air compressors |
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Ernie" <ernest.martinez@oracle.com>
I'd like more info on the compressors. Unlike the CJ's and Yaks, my L-29 has
no onboard compressor and must be recharged on the ground.
Ernie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Selby" <alikatz@mbay.net>
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Air compressors
> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jim Selby" <alikatz@mbay.net>
>
> Doug,
> I have one 28 volt Cornelius Compressor available. I also have several
> Cornelius Pumps, Military Overhauled still in the Box, very small units,
> 3000 psi, with Hydraulic Motors. If you need photos please contact me.
>
> Jim Selby, Jr
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Doug" <rvfltd@televar.com>
> To: <yak-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: Yak-List: Air compressors
>
>
> > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Doug" <rvfltd@televar.com>
> >
> > Is there anyone out there, who has in fact installed a Chinese air
> > compressor on a M14P or a M14P compressor on a 285 hp? Many of the guy
> with
> > M14P's are asking if I know for sure that the Chinese pump will work on
> the
> > M14P. Since I have not actually done it I cannot answer with absolute
> > confidence, I can only say that I "think" that it will fit up and work
> just
> > fine.
> >
> > Also, Ron Lee is looking for a 28 volt Cornelius compressor, anybody got
> > one?
> >
> >
> > Always Yakin,
> > Doug Sapp
> >
> >
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|