Yak-List Digest Archive

Mon 03/17/03


Total Messages Posted: 29



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:03 AM - YAK 18T is certifed (Mark Jefferies.)
     2. 04:08 AM - Re: Would like to talk with Yak 18T Owners (Brian Lloyd)
     3. 04:26 AM - Re: YAK 18T is certifed (Brian Lloyd)
     4. 04:29 AM - Re: Prop Strike (Mike McCoy)
     5. 05:00 AM - Re: Prop Strike (Kevin Pilling)
     6. 05:03 AM - Re: Prop Strike (Ernie)
     7. 05:13 AM - Re: Prop Strike (Ernie)
     8. 05:43 AM - Re: Prop Strike (Brian Lloyd)
     9. 05:43 AM - Re: Prop Strike (Gus Fraser)
    10. 05:45 AM - Re: Prop Strike (Brian Lloyd)
    11. 07:26 AM - Fw: special young eagle flights. (cjpilot710@aol.com)
    12. 07:56 AM - Re: Would like to talk with Yak 18T Owners (scott.huff@aivia.aero)
    13. 08:15 AM - Re: Re: Would like to talk with Yak 18T Owners (Brian Lloyd)
    14. 08:50 AM - Re: Re: Would like to talk with Yak 18T Owners (A. Dennis Savarese)
    15. 11:19 AM - Re: Prop Strike (N13472@aol.com)
    16. 11:53 AM - Fw: FW: special young eagle flights. (cjpilot710@aol.com)
    17. 12:20 PM - The Dick (N13472@aol.com)
    18. 12:44 PM - Re: Prop Strike (Brian Lloyd)
    19. 03:27 PM - Re: Prop Strike (Frank Haertlein)
    20. 03:54 PM - Re: Fw: FW: special young eagle flights. (Gus Fraser)
    21. 03:58 PM - Re: Prop Strike (Gus Fraser)
    22. 04:26 PM - Re: Prop Strike (Jon Boede)
    23. 04:44 PM - left elevator (jay reiter)
    24. 06:48 PM - RESULTS: Unofficial Formation Flying Poll (Harry Hirschman)
    25. 07:27 PM - Elevator (jay reiter)
    26. 07:31 PM - bent props and other things (cjpilot710@aol.com)
    27. 07:58 PM - 48 hours (cjpilot710@aol.com)
    28. 08:10 PM - Re: 48 hours (Barry Hancock)
    29. 08:13 PM - Re: bent props and other things (dabear)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:03:11 AM PST US
    From: "Mark Jefferies." <mark@yakuk.com>
    Subject: YAK 18T is certifed
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Mark Jefferies." <mark@yakuk.com> Readers, the YAK 18T does hold a full normal certificate of airworthiness in the OEM country and Hungary. Take a full C of A its better, why try and get the a/c experimental? A possible reason why so few in the USA is that they require a high open top container to ship.However we have the answer, fly it across from the UK. We can give you 10 hrs of fuel, it has a larger oil tank also, that's enough to do Iceland, green land etc. Summer is coming :))) And BTW the AN2 is also certified in the OEM and other countries in Europe, why use the experimental reg when for a little extra work you have an a/c that is able to operate on an AOC? Even the UK CAA accept the a/c has a full normal certificate!!! Best regards, fly safe & enjoy-Mark Jefferies For YAK UK Ltd www.yakuk.com Lt Gransden Airfield Sandy, Beds SG19 3BP England. Tel +44 (0)1767 651156. Fax +44 (0)1767 651157 Mobile +44 (0)7785 538 317 Conditions and terms of business Aircraft for sale


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:08:32 AM PST US
    From: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
    Subject: Re: Would like to talk with Yak 18T Owners
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> A. Dennis Savarese wrote: > --> Yak-List message posted by: "A. Dennis Savarese" <adsavar@gte.net> > > Excellent advice Gus. You are right on the money. AN2's are Experimental, > Exhibition, Group IV, Other. They are even mentioned in the FAA Order > description for Group IV. A BIG problem! You guys are so busy trying to second guess the FAA that you tend to ignore the obvious. Look for similar airplanes. Let's see ... aerobatic with two seats, carries passengers with four. This sounds like both the Marchetti SF-260 and the IAR-823. Both of these aircraft are Experimental/Exhibition, group 3. Everything the Soviets had was military. It just isn't that hard. So don't even ask the FAA what they think. Go in and just assume it will be Experimental/Exhibition, group 3 and let it go at that. They know even less than you do and will follow your lead. -- Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201 brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 +1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:26:00 AM PST US
    From: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
    Subject: Re: YAK 18T is certifed
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> Mark Jefferies. wrote: > A possible reason why so few in the USA is that they require a high open top > container to ship.However we have the answer, fly it across from the UK. We > can give you 10 hrs of fuel, it has a larger oil tank also, that's enough to > do Iceland, green land etc. Summer is coming :))) If you get any takers, I will be happy to fly it over for them. I need a break. > And BTW the AN2 is also certified in the OEM and other countries in Europe, > why use the experimental reg when for a little extra work you have an a/c > that is able to operate on an AOC? Even the UK CAA accept the a/c has a full > normal certificate!!! If you get it registered and certified there, not here. It cannot be registered with a normal AC here in the US. GAMA saw to that. -- Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201 brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 +1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:29:54 AM PST US
    From: "Mike McCoy" <mike@aircraftsales.com>
    Subject: Re: Prop Strike
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Mike McCoy" <mike@aircraftsales.com> Gus, I hope you're kidding! Most well trained and disciplined pilots will NEVER have a gear up landing. This is just total non-sense. However, a person who gets all their training and advice from an internet mail list is highly likely to have an accident (as I have said many times before). Also, a person who exihibits a pattern of several small incidents (running into their hanger, gear up landing, etc.) is very likely to kill themselves (and sooner rather than later). Take that as a prediction. Mike McCoy > --> Yak-List message posted by: Gus Fraser <fraseg@comcast.net> > > In the years I have been flying I have learned that the sayings in this game > are taught by bitter experience. Therefore I remind everyone of the saying: > > "There are two kinds of pilot. Those that have landed gear up, and those > that have yet to do so." > > Sorry to hear about it Ernie. > > Gus


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:00:51 AM PST US
    From: "Kevin Pilling" <kjpilling@btclick.com>
    Subject: Re: Prop Strike
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Kevin Pilling" <kjpilling@btclick.com> Mike you should be a negotiator by profession. Your unwavering tact and wholly bigoted appraisals are an evolving legend. fly safe kp ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike McCoy" <mike@aircraftsales.com> Subject: Re: Yak-List: Prop Strike > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Mike McCoy" <mike@aircraftsales.com> > > Gus, > > I hope you're kidding! Most well trained and disciplined pilots will NEVER > have a gear up landing. This is just total non-sense. However, a person > who gets all their training and advice from an internet mail list is highly > likely to have an accident (as I have said many times before). Also, a > person who exihibits a pattern of several small incidents (running into > their hanger, gear up landing, etc.) is very likely to kill themselves (and > sooner rather than later). Take that as a prediction. > > Mike McCoy > > > > --> Yak-List message posted by: Gus Fraser <fraseg@comcast.net> > > > > In the years I have been flying I have learned that the sayings in this > game > > are taught by bitter experience. Therefore I remind everyone of the > saying: > > > > "There are two kinds of pilot. Those that have landed gear up, and those > > that have yet to do so." > > > > Sorry to hear about it Ernie. > > > > Gus > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:03:49 AM PST US
    From: "Ernie" <ernest.martinez@oracle.com>
    Subject: Re: Prop Strike
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Ernie" <ernest.martinez@oracle.com> Mike all I have to say is you're a DICK! Ernie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike McCoy" <mike@aircraftsales.com> Subject: Re: Yak-List: Prop Strike > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Mike McCoy" <mike@aircraftsales.com> > > Gus, > > I hope you're kidding! Most well trained and disciplined pilots will NEVER > have a gear up landing. This is just total non-sense. However, a person > who gets all their training and advice from an internet mail list is highly > likely to have an accident (as I have said many times before). Also, a > person who exihibits a pattern of several small incidents (running into > their hanger, gear up landing, etc.) is very likely to kill themselves (and > sooner rather than later). Take that as a prediction. > > Mike McCoy > > > > --> Yak-List message posted by: Gus Fraser <fraseg@comcast.net> > > > > In the years I have been flying I have learned that the sayings in this > game > > are taught by bitter experience. Therefore I remind everyone of the > saying: > > > > "There are two kinds of pilot. Those that have landed gear up, and those > > that have yet to do so." > > > > Sorry to hear about it Ernie. > > > > Gus > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:13:37 AM PST US
    From: "Ernie" <ernest.martinez@oracle.com>
    Subject: Re: Prop Strike
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Ernie" <ernest.martinez@oracle.com> Let me re-phrase this. You're a complete, pompous, overbearing, egotistic, self serving, conceded, DICK! You must be so miserable that your only souce of enjoyment is at other peoples expense. You are the poster child for soneone who is trying to compensate for other shortcomings by acting as if you're gods gift to flight, while you hide behind your meserable little keyboard waitng in the dark for an opportunity to be even more vulgar a person than you have already exhibited on this list. Everyone has a bad day, and I cant wait for yours, but then you'll never be man enough to admit to a mistake will you. Ernie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike McCoy" <mike@aircraftsales.com> Subject: Re: Yak-List: Prop Strike > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Mike McCoy" <mike@aircraftsales.com> > > Gus, > > I hope you're kidding! Most well trained and disciplined pilots will NEVER > have a gear up landing. This is just total non-sense. However, a person > who gets all their training and advice from an internet mail list is highly > likely to have an accident (as I have said many times before). Also, a > person who exihibits a pattern of several small incidents (running into > their hanger, gear up landing, etc.) is very likely to kill themselves (and > sooner rather than later). Take that as a prediction. > > Mike McCoy > > > > --> Yak-List message posted by: Gus Fraser <fraseg@comcast.net> > > > > In the years I have been flying I have learned that the sayings in this > game > > are taught by bitter experience. Therefore I remind everyone of the > saying: > > > > "There are two kinds of pilot. Those that have landed gear up, and those > > that have yet to do so." > > > > Sorry to hear about it Ernie. > > > > Gus > >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:43:20 AM PST US
    From: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
    Subject: Re: Prop Strike
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> Mike McCoy wrote: > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Mike McCoy" <mike@aircraftsales.com> > > Gus, > > I hope you're kidding! Most well trained and disciplined pilots will NEVER > have a gear up landing. And some will. We are dealing with the human mind and all we can do is to instill good habit patterns through repetition that will hopefully still take hold when a brain-fart occurs. Good pilots with good skills, good training, and recent currency still run into situations that result in accidents and incidents. It is a fact of life. We just try to stay far enough from the edge of the envelope so we have some cushion for the momentary lapse of procedure. I know one supremely qualified, trained, and disciplined pilot who had a gear-up incident once in his life. He was waived off repeatedly due to a reoccuringly fouled runway and ultimately got into a low-fuel situation which resulted in an abbreviated pattern. The repeated violation of normal procedures with a not-quite-emergency thrown in broke the chain of procedure and training and resulted in a gear-up landing. Yup, he f----d up but he had a lot of help rom the situation getting there. Yes Mike, shit happens to even the best since no one is perfect. Yes, we should all work toward perfection but we should also accept that there are conditions that can break even the best chain of training and habit. We all hope that we will have a stroke of good luck when that happens. And everyone else I know hopes that the other guy will also have a stroke of good luck when he/she needs it most. > This is just total non-sense. However, a person who gets all their training > and advice from an internet mail list is highly likely to have an accident > (as I have said many times before). Here is a question for you. How much of what you learned came from hangar flying in the squadron ready room? How much came from discussions in the O'Club over a beer after a day of flying? Now explain to me the difference between hangar flying in the squadron ready room and hangar flying on this list. I suspect there were a few new pilots fresh from the training command in your squadron. Did you give them shit for listening to the other pilots talk? Did you give them shit for asking questions? Did any of the other, more experienced pilots ever make a mistake and have to be corrected? I know you would never make a mistake but others might. And, oh-my-gosh, what did you do when it was the CO that uttered incorrect information? I suspect you didn't say, "You are wrong and you are an idiot and you are going to kill yourself." I suspect you said something like, "Pardon me sir but I remember that differently. I think we ought to check this section of the manual over here just to be sure." Sometimes it is all in how you say it. > Also, a person who exihibits a pattern of several small incidents (running > into their hanger, gear up landing, etc.) is very likely to kill themselves > (and sooner rather than later). Take that as a prediction. So instead of castigating, perhaps you could help? -- Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201 brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 +1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:43:34 AM PST US
    From: Gus Fraser <fraseg@comcast.net>
    Subject: Prop Strike
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Gus Fraser <fraseg@comcast.net> In general I agree with you but I am sure that if you asked every pilot who has had a gear up if they thought it would ever happen to them I am sure that they will say no way. The point of the statement is as a reminder that it does not take much to stray from the straight and narrow. I get my information from many places:- Fortune cookies. Throwing runes and goat entrails. Idle gossip. Banking Research analysts. Even the internet. And yes I do have a warped sense of reality. Gus -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Mike McCoy Subject: Re: Yak-List: Prop Strike --> Yak-List message posted by: "Mike McCoy" <mike@aircraftsales.com> Gus, I hope you're kidding! Most well trained and disciplined pilots will NEVER have a gear up landing. This is just total non-sense. However, a person who gets all their training and advice from an internet mail list is highly likely to have an accident (as I have said many times before). Also, a person who exihibits a pattern of several small incidents (running into their hanger, gear up landing, etc.) is very likely to kill themselves (and sooner rather than later). Take that as a prediction. Mike McCoy > --> Yak-List message posted by: Gus Fraser <fraseg@comcast.net> > > In the years I have been flying I have learned that the sayings in this game > are taught by bitter experience. Therefore I remind everyone of the saying: > > "There are two kinds of pilot. Those that have landed gear up, and those > that have yet to do so." > > Sorry to hear about it Ernie. > > Gus


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:45:48 AM PST US
    From: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
    Subject: Re: Prop Strike
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> Ernie wrote: > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Ernie" <ernest.martinez@oracle.com> > > Let me re-phrase this. > > You're a complete, pompous, overbearing, egotistic, self serving, > conceded, DICK! You must be so miserable that your only souce of enjoyment > is at other peoples expense. Ernie, I think you are holding back here. Perhaps you would like to say how you *really* feel. It's OK. You are among friends. -- Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201 brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 +1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:26:42 AM PST US
    From: cjpilot710@aol.com
    Subject: Fwd: special young eagle flights.
    --> Yak-List message posted by: cjpilot710@aol.com Jim "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" Benjamin Franklin 1759 "With my shield, or on it" Trojan Warriors BC Subject: RE: special young eagle flights. From: "warbirds" <warbirds@eaa.org> Jim, Those reports are alarming and disappointing. I will discuss this matter with our EAA Young Eagles Coordinator and see what can be done. Thank you for sharing this information. Sincerely, Bill Fischer, Executive Director EAA Warbirds of America -----Original Message----- From: cjpilot710@aol.com [mailto:cjpilot710@aol.com] Subject: special young eagle flights. EAAWB We have been hearing news reports of late, that school children of service personal, have been mocked by their "educators" and other children. This being some absurd attempt at antiwar sentiment. A number of our members have suggested that EAAWB sponsor some type of action to give special recognition and appreciation to the children of service personal. It was recommended that special Young Eagle flights be offered to the different military service dependent programs. Would that be possible? Jim Goosby Jim Goolsby, YPA Board Member "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" Benjamin Franklin 1759 "With my shield, or on it" Trojan Warriors BC <META content"MSHTML 5.00.2920.0" nameGENERATOR> Jim, Those reports are alarming and disappointing. I will discuss this matter with our EAA Young Eagles Coordinator and see what can be done. Thank you for sharing this information. Sincerely, Bill Fischer, Executive Director EAA Warbirds of America -----Original Message----- From: cjpilot710@aol.com [mailto:cjpilot710@aol.com] PM Cc: yak-list@matronics.com Subject: special young eagle flights. EAAWB We have been hearing news reports of late, that school children of service personal, have been mocked by their "educators" and other children. This being some absurd attempt at antiwar sentiment. A number of our members have suggested that EAAWB sponsor some type of action to give special recognition and appreciation to the children of service personal. It was recommended that special Young Eagle flights be offered to the different military service dependent programs. Would that be possible? Jim Goosby Jim Goolsby, YPA Board Member "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" Benjamin Franklin 1759 "With my shield, or on it" Trojan Warriors BC


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:56:18 AM PST US
    From: scott.huff@aivia.aero
    Subject: Re: Would like to talk with Yak 18T Owners
    --> Yak-List message posted by: scott.huff@aivia.aero Excellent advice from everyone regarding airworthiness certification of the 18T. Thank you very much for the feedback! I performed a search of the FAA database and discovered the following: 1. There are six Yak 18Ts currently registered with the FAA in the US. 2. Of the six, four were issued Experimental/Exhibition airworthiness certificates. 3. The other two didn't list any airworthiness certification, so I'm assuming they have just been imported and/or under restoration, pending an airworthiness inspection. 4. The 18T that was for sale in Virginia Beach did not show up in the list of six. I'm assuming the Bill of Sale issues have not been resolved as of yet. So, based on this information alone, I am assuming that the FAA considers the 18T in Group 3 of the Experimental/Exhibition category. Correct assumption? Should I contact my local FSDO and pose the hypothetical question, or do you think this might cause problems down the road? Respectfully, Scott Huff


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:15:24 AM PST US
    From: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
    Subject: Re: Would like to talk with Yak 18T Owners
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> scott.huff@aivia.aero wrote: > Should I contact my local FSDO and pose the hypothetical question, or do you > think this might cause problems down the road? If the aircraft does not have an AC yet, try to deal with the nearest MIDO to get the inital one issued. It makes it much easier for your FSDO because the thinking part has already been done for them and they don't have to make a value judgement as to which category. -- Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201 brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 +1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:50:21 AM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <adsavar@gte.net>
    Subject: Re: Would like to talk with Yak 18T Owners
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "A. Dennis Savarese" <adsavar@gte.net> Scott, I'd present them with a copy of another 18T's operating limitations. Plus if you're 9 months to a year away, the same airworthiness inspector may not be there when it comes time for you to certify you airplane. Dennis Savarese ----- Original Message ----- From: <scott.huff@aivia.aero> Subject: Yak-List: Re: Would like to talk with Yak 18T Owners > --> Yak-List message posted by: scott.huff@aivia.aero > > Excellent advice from everyone regarding airworthiness certification of the > 18T. Thank you very much for the feedback! > > I performed a search of the FAA database and discovered the following: > > 1. There are six Yak 18Ts currently registered with the FAA in the US. > > 2. Of the six, four were issued Experimental/Exhibition airworthiness > certificates. > > 3. The other two didn't list any airworthiness certification, so I'm assuming > they have just been imported and/or under restoration, pending an airworthiness > inspection. > > 4. The 18T that was for sale in Virginia Beach did not show up in the list of > six. I'm assuming the Bill of Sale issues have not been resolved as of yet. > > So, based on this information alone, I am assuming that the FAA considers the > 18T in Group 3 of the Experimental/Exhibition category. Correct assumption? > > Should I contact my local FSDO and pose the hypothetical question, or do you > think this might cause problems down the road? > > Respectfully, > Scott Huff > >


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:19:51 AM PST US
    From: N13472@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Prop Strike
    --> Yak-List message posted by: N13472@aol.com VERY WELL SAID !!!!!!!!!!!!


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:53:36 AM PST US
    From: cjpilot710@aol.com
    Subject: Fwd: FW: special young eagle flights.
    --> Yak-List message posted by: cjpilot710@aol.com Jim "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" Benjamin Franklin 1759 "With my shield, or on it" Trojan Warriors BC Subject: FW: special young eagle flights. Hi Jim, We received a similar suggestion recently from another member. I agree it is an excellent idea and should be considered by all Warbird Squadrons and EAA Chapters. The families of those shipped overseas are having a tough time. Although I have not personally heard or read about children being "mocked" this does represent a population of kids who could use a little TLC right about now. I would suggest you encourage your local squadron and fellow Warbird and EAA members to participate. We will be doing the same though various communication methods we have with the Chapters and our Coordinators. Thanks for the great suggestion, Steve Buss EAA Young Eagles Program -----Original Message----- From: cjpilot710@aol.com [mailto:cjpilot710@aol.com] Subject: special young eagle flights. EAAWB We have been hearing news reports of late, that school children of service personal, have been mocked by their "educators" and other children. This being some absurd attempt at antiwar sentiment. A number of our members have suggested that EAAWB sponsor some type of action to give special recognition and appreciation to the children of service personal. It was recommended that special Young Eagle flights be offered to the different military service dependent programs. Would that be possible? Jim Goosby Jim Goolsby, YPA Board Member "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" Benjamin Franklin 1759 "With my shield, or on it" Trojan Warriors BC <META content"MSHTML 6.00.2719.2200" nameGENERATOR> Hi Jim, We received a similar suggestion recently from another member. I agree it is an excellent idea and should be considered by all Warbird Squadrons and EAA Chapters. The families of those shipped overseas are having a tough time. Although I have not personally heard or read about children being "mocked" this does represent a population of kids who could use a little TLC right about now. I would suggest you encourage your local squadron and fellow Warbird and EAA members to participate. We will be doing the same though various communication methods we have with the Chapters and our Coordinators. Thanks for the great suggestion, Steve Buss EAA Young Eagles Program -----Original Message----- From: cjpilot710@aol.com [mailto:cjpilot710@aol.com] PM Cc: yak-list@matronics.com Subject: special young eagle flights. EAAWB We have been hearing news reports of late, that school children of service personal, have been mocked=20by their "educators" and other children. This being some absurd attempt at antiwar sentiment. A number of our members have suggested that EAAWB sponsor some type of action to give special recognition and appreciation to the children of service personal. It was recommended that special Young Eagle flights be offered to the different military service dependent programs. Would that be possible? Jim Goosby Jim Goolsby, YPA Board Member "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" Benjamin Franklin 1759 "With my shield, or on it" Trojan Warriors BC


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:20:47 PM PST US
    From: N13472@aol.com
    Subject: The Dick
    --> Yak-List message posted by: N13472@aol.com VERY WELL SAID !!!! Ernie. I believe that your comments reflect the opinion's of most of the members of this list. Subj: Re: Yak-List: Prop Strike From: ernest.martinez@oracle.com (Ernie) --> Yak-List message posted by: "Ernie" <ernest.martinez@oracle.com> Let me re-phrase this. You're a complete, pompous, overbearing, egotistic, self serving, conceded, DICK! You must be so miserable that your only souce of enjoyment is at other peoples expense. You are the poster child for soneone who is trying to compensate for other shortcomings by acting as if you're gods gift to flight, while you hide behind your meserable little keyboard waitng in the dark for an opportunity to be even more vulgar a person than you have already exhibited on this list. Everyone has a bad day, and I cant wait for yours, but then you'll never be man enough to admit to a mistake will you. Ernie


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:44:05 PM PST US
    From: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
    Subject: Re: Prop Strike
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> N13472@aol.com wrote: > --> Yak-List message posted by: N13472@aol.com > > VERY WELL SAID !!!!!!!!!!!! Thank you. (I think.) -- Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201 brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 +1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:27:54 PM PST US
    From: "Frank Haertlein" <yak52driver@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Prop Strike
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Frank Haertlein" <yak52driver@earthlink.net> Brian; I think you are basically right. A list like this can be valuable because it's seen by so many eyes in a number of different countries.....more eyes than you would expect in a typical hanger talk BS session. That makes this list MORE valuable. When someone's advice was a little off, I've seen other people call them on it and that only adds to the learning experience........old wives tales, so to speak, won't last long around here. My 2 for what it's worth. Frank N911OM -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd Subject: Re: Yak-List: Prop Strike --> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> Mike McCoy wrote: > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Mike McCoy" <mike@aircraftsales.com> > > Gus, > > I hope you're kidding! Most well trained and disciplined pilots will > NEVER > have a gear up landing. And some will. We are dealing with the human mind and all we can do is to instill good habit patterns through repetition that will hopefully still take hold when a brain-fart occurs. Good pilots with good skills, good training, and recent currency still run into situations that result in accidents and incidents. It is a fact of life. We just try to stay far enough from the edge of the envelope so we have some cushion for the momentary lapse of procedure. I know one supremely qualified, trained, and disciplined pilot who had a gear-up incident once in his life. He was waived off repeatedly due to a reoccuringly fouled runway and ultimately got into a low-fuel situation which resulted in an abbreviated pattern. The repeated violation of normal procedures with a not-quite-emergency thrown in broke the chain of procedure and training and resulted in a gear-up landing. Yup, he f----d up but he had a lot of help rom the situation getting there. Yes Mike, shit happens to even the best since no one is perfect. Yes, we should all work toward perfection but we should also accept that there are conditions that can break even the best chain of training and habit. We all hope that we will have a stroke of good luck when that happens. And everyone else I know hopes that the other guy will also have a stroke of good luck when he/she needs it most. > This is just total non-sense. However, a person who gets all their > training > and advice from an internet mail list is highly likely to have an accident > (as I have said many times before). Here is a question for you. How much of what you learned came from hangar flying in the squadron ready room? How much came from discussions in the O'Club over a beer after a day of flying? Now explain to me the difference between hangar flying in the squadron ready room and hangar flying on this list. I suspect there were a few new pilots fresh from the training command in your squadron. Did you give them shit for listening to the other pilots talk? Did you give them shit for asking questions? Did any of the other, more experienced pilots ever make a mistake and have to be corrected? I know you would never make a mistake but others might. And, oh-my-gosh, what did you do when it was the CO that uttered incorrect information? I suspect you didn't say, "You are wrong and you are an idiot and you are going to kill yourself." I suspect you said something like, "Pardon me sir but I remember that differently. I think we ought to check this section of the manual over here just to be sure." Sometimes it is all in how you say it. > Also, a person who exihibits a pattern of several small incidents > (running > into their hanger, gear up landing, etc.) is very likely to kill themselves > (and sooner rather than later). Take that as a prediction. So instead of castigating, perhaps you could help? -- Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201 brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 +1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax direct advertising on the Matronics Forums.


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:54:17 PM PST US
    From: Gus Fraser <fraseg@comcast.net>
    Subject: Fwd: FW: special young eagle flights.
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Gus Fraser <fraseg@comcast.net> Did everyone see the feedback I got from EAA regarding my initial enquiry ? -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of cjpilot710@aol.com Subject: Yak-List: Fwd: FW: special young eagle flights. --> Yak-List message posted by: cjpilot710@aol.com Jim "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" Benjamin Franklin 1759 "With my shield, or on it" Trojan Warriors BC Subject: FW: special young eagle flights. Hi Jim, We received a similar suggestion recently from another member. I agree it is an excellent idea and should be considered by all Warbird Squadrons and EAA Chapters. The families of those shipped overseas are having a tough time. Although I have not personally heard or read about children being "mocked" this does represent a population of kids who could use a little TLC right about now. I would suggest you encourage your local squadron and fellow Warbird and EAA members to participate. We will be doing the same though various communication methods we have with the Chapters and our Coordinators. Thanks for the great suggestion, Steve Buss EAA Young Eagles Program -----Original Message----- From: cjpilot710@aol.com [mailto:cjpilot710@aol.com] Subject: special young eagle flights. EAAWB We have been hearing news reports of late, that school children of service personal, have been mocked by their "educators" and other children. This being some absurd attempt at antiwar sentiment. A number of our members have suggested that EAAWB sponsor some type of action to give special recognition and appreciation to the children of service personal. It was recommended that special Young Eagle flights be offered to the different military service dependent programs. Would that be possible? Jim Goosby Jim Goolsby, YPA Board Member "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" Benjamin Franklin 1759 "With my shield, or on it" Trojan Warriors BC <META content"MSHTML 6.00.2719.2200" nameGENERATOR> Hi Jim, We received a similar suggestion recently from another member. I agree it is an excellent idea and should be considered by all Warbird Squadrons and EAA Chapters. The families of those shipped overseas are having a tough time. Although I have not personally heard or read about children being "mocked" this does represent a population of kids who could use a little TLC right about now. I would suggest you encourage your local squadron and fellow Warbird and EAA members to participate. We will be doing the same though various communication methods we have with the Chapters and our Coordinators. Thanks for the great suggestion, Steve Buss EAA Young Eagles Program -----Original Message----- From: cjpilot710@aol.com [mailto:cjpilot710@aol.com] PM Cc: yak-list@matronics.com Subject: special young eagle flights. EAAWB We have been hearing news reports of late, that school children of service personal, have been mocked=20by their "educators" and other children. This being some absurd attempt at antiwar sentiment. A number of our members have suggested that EAAWB sponsor some type of action to give special recognition and appreciation to the children of service personal. It was recommended that special Young Eagle flights be offered to the different military service dependent programs. Would that be possible? Jim Goosby Jim Goolsby, YPA Board Member "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" Benjamin Franklin 1759 "With my shield, or on it" Trojan Warriors BC


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:58:49 PM PST US
    From: Gus Fraser <fraseg@comcast.net>
    Subject: Prop Strike
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Gus Fraser <fraseg@comcast.net> Who would have thought that a comment of sympathy for Ernie's friend would cause such a reaction. Just when you thought it was safe to get back on the list....... Gus -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Frank Haertlein Subject: RE: Yak-List: Prop Strike --> Yak-List message posted by: "Frank Haertlein" <yak52driver@earthlink.net> Brian; I think you are basically right. A list like this can be valuable because it's seen by so many eyes in a number of different countries.....more eyes than you would expect in a typical hanger talk BS session. That makes this list MORE valuable. When someone's advice was a little off, I've seen other people call them on it and that only adds to the learning experience........old wives tales, so to speak, won't last long around here. My 2 for what it's worth. Frank N911OM -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd Subject: Re: Yak-List: Prop Strike --> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> Mike McCoy wrote: > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Mike McCoy" <mike@aircraftsales.com> > > Gus, > > I hope you're kidding! Most well trained and disciplined pilots will > NEVER > have a gear up landing. And some will. We are dealing with the human mind and all we can do is to instill good habit patterns through repetition that will hopefully still take hold when a brain-fart occurs. Good pilots with good skills, good training, and recent currency still run into situations that result in accidents and incidents. It is a fact of life. We just try to stay far enough from the edge of the envelope so we have some cushion for the momentary lapse of procedure. I know one supremely qualified, trained, and disciplined pilot who had a gear-up incident once in his life. He was waived off repeatedly due to a reoccuringly fouled runway and ultimately got into a low-fuel situation which resulted in an abbreviated pattern. The repeated violation of normal procedures with a not-quite-emergency thrown in broke the chain of procedure and training and resulted in a gear-up landing. Yup, he f----d up but he had a lot of help rom the situation getting there. Yes Mike, shit happens to even the best since no one is perfect. Yes, we should all work toward perfection but we should also accept that there are conditions that can break even the best chain of training and habit. We all hope that we will have a stroke of good luck when that happens. And everyone else I know hopes that the other guy will also have a stroke of good luck when he/she needs it most. > This is just total non-sense. However, a person who gets all their > training > and advice from an internet mail list is highly likely to have an accident > (as I have said many times before). Here is a question for you. How much of what you learned came from hangar flying in the squadron ready room? How much came from discussions in the O'Club over a beer after a day of flying? Now explain to me the difference between hangar flying in the squadron ready room and hangar flying on this list. I suspect there were a few new pilots fresh from the training command in your squadron. Did you give them shit for listening to the other pilots talk? Did you give them shit for asking questions? Did any of the other, more experienced pilots ever make a mistake and have to be corrected? I know you would never make a mistake but others might. And, oh-my-gosh, what did you do when it was the CO that uttered incorrect information? I suspect you didn't say, "You are wrong and you are an idiot and you are going to kill yourself." I suspect you said something like, "Pardon me sir but I remember that differently. I think we ought to check this section of the manual over here just to be sure." Sometimes it is all in how you say it. > Also, a person who exihibits a pattern of several small incidents > (running > into their hanger, gear up landing, etc.) is very likely to kill themselves > (and sooner rather than later). Take that as a prediction. So instead of castigating, perhaps you could help? -- Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201 brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 +1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax direct advertising on the Matronics Forums.


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:26:04 PM PST US
    Subject: Prop Strike
    From: "Jon Boede" <jon@zoso.email.net>
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jon Boede" <jon@zoso.email.net> Larry Salganek made a great remark at the NWOC last month when he was giving a talk on safety... he said that when you've gotten news of the sequence of events that happened that lead to some accident and you say: "That would never happen to me. I'd never do that." And you're right: you'll probably never do *that*... but, now you have to complete the statement by saying, "No, the way *I'm* going to screw up... is..." and then come up with the thing *you're* going to miss, in your own special way, just in that fragile moment when it matters. Because you're human... and humans do that. Jon > --> Yak-List message posted by: Gus Fraser <fraseg@comcast.net> > > Who would have thought that a comment of sympathy for Ernie's friend > would cause such a reaction. > > Just when you thought it was safe to get back on the list....... > > Gus > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Frank Haertlein > To: yak-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: Yak-List: Prop Strike > > > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Frank Haertlein" > <yak52driver@earthlink.net> > > Brian; > I think you are basically right. A list like this can be valuable > because it's seen by so many eyes in a number of different > countries.....more eyes than you would expect in a typical hanger talk > BS session. That makes this list MORE valuable. When someone's advice > was a little off, I've seen other people call them on it and that only > adds to the learning experience........old wives tales, so to speak, > won't last long around here. > > My 2 for what it's worth. > Frank > N911OM > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd > To: yak-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Yak-List: Prop Strike > > > --> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> > > Mike McCoy wrote: >> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Mike McCoy" <mike@aircraftsales.com> >> >> Gus, >> >> I hope you're kidding! Most well trained and disciplined pilots will >> NEVER >> have a gear up landing. > > And some will. We are dealing with the human mind and all we can do is > to instill good habit patterns through repetition that will hopefully > still take hold when a brain-fart occurs. Good pilots with good skills, > good training, and recent currency still run into situations that result > in accidents and incidents. It is a fact of life. We just try to stay > far enough from the edge of the envelope so we have some cushion for the > momentary lapse of procedure. > > I know one supremely qualified, trained, and disciplined pilot who had a > gear-up incident once in his life. He was waived off repeatedly due to > a reoccuringly fouled runway and ultimately got into a low-fuel > situation which resulted in an abbreviated pattern. The repeated > violation of normal procedures with a not-quite-emergency thrown in > broke the chain of procedure and training and resulted in a gear-up > landing. Yup, he f----d up but he had a lot of help rom the situation > getting there. > > Yes Mike, shit happens to even the best since no one is perfect. Yes, > we should all work toward perfection but we should also accept that > there are conditions that can break even the best chain of training and > habit. We all hope that we will have a stroke of good luck when that > happens. And everyone else I know hopes that the other guy will also > have a stroke of good luck when he/she needs it most. > >> This is just total non-sense. However, a person who gets all their >> training >> and advice from an internet mail list is highly likely to have an > accident >> (as I have said many times before). > > Here is a question for you. How much of what you learned came from > hangar flying in the squadron ready room? How much came from > discussions in the O'Club over a beer after a day of flying? Now > explain to me the difference between hangar flying in the squadron ready > room and hangar flying on this list. I suspect there were a few new > pilots fresh from the training command in your squadron. Did you give > them shit for listening to the other pilots talk? Did you give them > shit for asking questions? Did any of the other, more experienced > pilots ever make a mistake and have to be corrected? I know you would > never make a mistake but others might. > > And, oh-my-gosh, what did you do when it was the CO that uttered > incorrect information? I suspect you didn't say, "You are wrong and you > are an idiot and you are going to kill yourself." I suspect you said > something like, "Pardon me sir but I remember that differently. I think > we ought to check this section of the manual over here just to be sure." > Sometimes it is all in how you say it. > >> Also, a person who exihibits a pattern of several small incidents >> (running >> into their hanger, gear up landing, etc.) is very likely to kill > themselves >> (and sooner rather than later). Take that as a prediction. > > So instead of castigating, perhaps you could help? > > -- > > Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201 > brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802 > +1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:44:49 PM PST US
    From: "jay reiter" <jmreiter@adelphia.net>
    Subject: left elevator
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "jay reiter" <jmreiter@adelphia.net> Does anyone have a left elevator for a CJ gathering dust. I am repairing one for a friend. The one I am working on will need a bit of work. So we may want to fly wile this one is being fixed. Jay


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:48:15 PM PST US
    From: Harry Hirschman <hairball192@yahoo.com>
    Subject: RESULTS: Unofficial Formation Flying Poll
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Harry Hirschman <hairball192@yahoo.com> Thanks to everyone who replied to my unofficial poll and thanks to those who didn't for putting up with it. Below are the responses I received. It's a long read, but the short story is people fly formation when they can find a wingman they know and trust because it is challenging and fun; They follow the regs and would like to learn how to do more advanced stuff including dogfighting; and when they RTB they get a generally positive, but mixed, reception from the rest of the airport crowd. Harry --------------- 1. Why do you fly formation? Because it sharpens my flying skills, and is a heck of a lot of fun. Formation flying is more challenging than any instrument flying you can do. ...and a hell of a lot more fun! It also looks really great when you're flying to a competition (or even to another airport for lunch.) It really keeps your flying skills sharp! I have been flying formation with my T28 for 12 years. I love it. I have done some formation work in my S1-S. I fly formation every chance I get! Why formation? It's fun and challenging! Enjoy the company- like riding motorcycles side-by-side. Fun, hone my skills The 4 disciplines for a Pitts pilot: akro, dogfighting, air-racing, formation It is VERY fun and good for practice on a/c control. EXCELLENT photo experience It's fun! Because it's fun! The precision flying skills required are enormously satisfying. Its challenging and improves airplane handling. Same as why I fly aerobatics. It's fun, another chance to improve flying skills Fun. Part of a group of L-16's , Fox Wing of the Wrong Brother's Air Force Only when enroute to a contest. Because it is fun and challenging. Yes, because its challenging and fun Same reason bikers ride in groups. It's fun, it looks cool and you can get a flight of 4 into or out of an airport nearly as quickly as a single ship I fly formation because it is an absolute hoot. It is challenging, and being successful is a very satisfying feeling. It is also an opportunity to spend quality time with a great bunch of guys 2. Why do you NOT fly formation? Lack of formation flying partners. Feel free to look me up if you're going to be in the New York City / Long Island area. mailto:steve.carpenter@nyc.rr.com Can't find anyone to fly with Hard to find partners; Hard to find partners you can fly with frequently enough to build competency Similar aircraft and interested pilot hard to coordinate. If I am not familiar with the other aircrafts pilot skills there is no one to fly with. Because there's no one else around to fly with? Cannot find anyone else that knows how. don't trust the other guy. Odd question. I do it whenver I can. I guess I don't fly formation when the other people are not knowlegable/qualified. Too hard to stay in the box. Might be an ex-navy guy in the other plane. On the wing I miss the all the gals on the boat waving... I fly formation whenever I get the chance. The main show stopper is that it's hard to find other pilots who are qualified and willing. I'm guessing most are afraid of mid-airs or trying something new Not applicable 3. What FAR's do you keep in mind when flying formation? All of the appropriate ones, just as I do for any flight. (Is that politically correct, or what ?) Any FAR's that pertain to formation flight or pertain to the flight itself. (how was that for covering the bases?) It's also extremely important to do a pre-flight briefing with all the pilots, as well as a post-flight briefing. You don't want any surprises while flying in formation. Always pre brief. I follow all the regular FARs for solo flight and add the requirement of preflight briefing, communication frequencies, emerg. procedures,etc. FAR Schmar: Lead insures that We do not hit anything, Wing insures that we do not hit each other. No other rules Never without prior briefing (however informal) generally avoid populated areas (class b/c) All of them! (This was a trick question, right? ;-) 91.111 it's got to be pre arranged Before flight. Well, in Canada, not many :-) Can't think of any Consent of other aircraft in the flight; cloud clearances; obstacle clearances FAR 91.111 I can't remember them, but I know there is one catch all about wreckless flying etc... None. I am not aware of any limitation other than the one that says it must be prearranged. Part 121 mostly, would hate to hit one of those big fellas. Corrdination between the PIC of all aircraft involved. i.e. a good pre brief. also, not operating so close as to cause a hazard (I'm to lazy to get the FAR/AIM out to look them up) All that I can remember 4. Are you interested in learning advanced formation skills like maneuvering form, formation acro, and tactical formation (and dogfighting)? A current regular Air Force (ours) friend flys with me whenever he is in town. Yes, and for those of you interested, Michael Mancuso (who flew with The Northern Lights and is now doing a solo act) teaches formation flying at all levels. He's on Long Island in NY, so if you get to the area, I highly recommend doing a flight or two with him. Michael can be reached at nlight4@aol.com. Sure. I would like to learn dogfighting skills. I would like to do barrel rolls around a central leader. I fly a Pitts S1 and a Su29 in Advanced category in the northeast. My airport (IAG) has a tower and a military base and supports all manner of formation activities. Across the border with Canada ,only 15 miles away, is AirCombat Canada. They discourage guys like me from engaging each other. They would love me to spend thousands of dollars in their Extras , though! Scratch that! They crashed them last year in a military formation training exercise that killed one of the pilots. Now they fly a Stearman and a Citabria. Maybe I'll try that route again. A Citabris has got to be half the cost of the Extra. Are you mad? Yes yes, only source now is books (not skills so much as best-practices, hand signals etc) Making the leap to formation akro is very hard. Yep, and getting my FAST card. Most definatly!!! #4 yes. One thing that isn't emphasized often enough: no out-of-visual maneuvers, which is what killed the "french connection", who flew some of the best piston formation I've ever seen, except perhaps for the northern lights (andre lortie et al). Yes Yes. I'm tired of being jumped and not able to "fight" my way out of it Are aircraft available for rental? Unless everyone is flying the same type of aircraft, dissimilar aircraft can be killer. yes Of course. But then, many of us are already doing that. Sure, always like free beers from the other guy Yes I don't know what this means. I am not interested in dogfighting. I enjoy all of the standard formation maneuvers including barrel rolls and loops on the wing or whatever lead does that requires me to keep station 5. Does your airport support formation traffic patterns like formation takeoffs, overhead breaks and pitch-outs? I fly out of Lewis University Airport (LOT), uncontrolled field, but lots of student training. When traffic permits, we make "360 overhead" approaches and no one had complained. We regularly fly to Springfield, Illinois airport (towered) where the Illinois Air Guard has a squadron of F-16's, and when we ask for an overhead break, they just ask what altitude we want for Initial Brookhaven in Long Island (HWV) does not allow formation takeoffs / landings, however, we line up behind each other on the ramp. When the plane in front of you is rolling, you take position on the runway. When the plane ahead of you hits 60 MPH, he calls "Sixty" on the radio, then you start your roll. This gives adequate separation, yet allows you to join up on the crosswind. On return, the leader will call "break formation" on the downwind as he turns base. This gives you plenty of time to extend your downwind and land appropriately and with proper separation. Note: HWV is a non-towered class-G. Most airports, I have been to, do allow formation work. Every once and awhile I will run into a controller that does not have a clue, but, this is the exception. Our runway isn't wide enough, nor are there generally enough flying airplanes Yes: controlled field (FCM) is very receptive Yes, LVK. Attitude aviation here claims to have a formation course. Yep, even smoke from initial to the break. I am guessing no. I'm not ready for that yet. Usually we have just taken it to the extent of flight of two with an exceptable seperation. #5 yes. Sure, but the runway at our uncontrolled airport is only 75 feet wide, so we only do formation takeoffs, not formation landings. Formation landings are obviously an advanced maneuver, especially in an aircraft with poor visibility and difficult ground-handling characteristics such as the Pitts. But too many people consider formation takeoffs to be an easier maneuver and that isn't always so. Uncontrolled Field Yes The airports and ATC in my area don't care. They will occasionally ask that we state for the record that we assume responsibility for separation. Yeah, but it hasn't happened much around here since our formation leader skipped town Some times. Once coming back from a contest one of the guys knew some sort of landing in formation thing that we did. We came down together and as we were to land the lead plane banked to the right and I followed. I forget what he called it. And this was at a Class D airport, Hanscom AFB right outside of Boston. Yes. the airport loves it. Roger. 2,3,4. Yes, SHV Shreveport Down Town, most of the controllers are ex military or have worked at joint use fields. They have been really good working with us, they offer myself and about 3 or 4 other guys "initial" as soon as we check in. A couple of the controllers know how to use "approach end / mid field/departure end break" to space us in the pattern Yes http://platinum.yahoo.com


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:27:04 PM PST US
    From: "jay reiter" <jmreiter@adelphia.net>
    Subject: Elevator
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "jay reiter" <jmreiter@adelphia.net> Thanks Doug for the quick action I will pass on the info.


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:31:40 PM PST US
    From: cjpilot710@aol.com
    Subject: bent props and other things
    --> Yak-List message posted by: cjpilot710@aol.com Some of you know me personally and my back ground. For those who don't, briefly I started flying when I was 15. The year I turned 23, I had 3,000 hours and my ATP. I now have over 23,000 hours. I have every Boeing type rateing except for the B737. I now have over a 1,000 hours in the CJ-6. A few years ago, I pulled the gear out from under my perfectly good CJ-6 while taxing in. Those who were there, know how badly that effected me. It was the first time I have ever bent an airplane, ever. With in a few days, sensing a need, I had no less than 3 of my contemporaries call, and 'welcome me to the "Club". These were very professional high time pilots. In the years sense, I've seen Navy trained professionals, who had never flown a fixed gear airplane, land with the gear up. I've heard of decorated military jocks, kill notches on their belt, land their perfectly good F-"Sweet Jesus!" gear up. I have come to the conclusion that as long as there are retractable gear, human beings will make gear up landings. Its a given law of the universe. Every time I hear these stories and safety studies prove it, there is always an extenuating circumstance that mixed its self into normal operations. The military with deep pockets, can dictate fantastic training programs and unlimited gas from the pumps for it. We just don't have that. The mind set of that military experience, though some may think it infallible, can't money wise and personality wise, work on the civilian ramp. BUT what does carry over are the causes, for "dumb ass" tricks like landing with the gear up. BTW those are usually the first words uttered by the offender. What we learn from this, is that screw ups, like these, happen when something different is happening. Something has been added to the situation out of the norm. THIS is the time to be really careful. Formation flying, working airshows, practicing emergencies, or flying into a strange field with your warbird, and noticing a shapely blond looking in your direction, add to the distractions that can lead to bent birds. Some pilots handle these distractions handily. The more hours under the belt, the better you get, BUT THERE'S NO DAMN GUARANTEE! Training? Yes, it helps. It does a lot of good. BUT it is still not a guarantee. Get well verist with your airplane's handling and its systems. Know them hands down. Understand what you are doing when you are performing the emergency procedures if you need too. Make sure you know what is expected of you during a formation and know what YOU are capable of doing during any flight. Than try to improve. The screw ups are always waiting out there for the unsuspecting pilot. Like the legendary Gremlins of WW2, they sit on the airport fences or hangar conners. They hid in the mist with the hills and other hard things. And they don't give a tinkers damn on how long you've been around. They'll catch you when you're not looking. Jim Goolsby "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" Benjamin Franklin 1759 "With my shield, or on it" Trojan Warriors BC


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:58:19 PM PST US
    From: cjpilot710@aol.com
    Subject: 48 hours
    KROwen@charter.net, mentor@cheshir.com, PaulSanden@aol.com, Ruthcopes@aol.com, artziggy6@yahoo.com, carriesuerowe@yahoo.com, paulbeth.mullen@worldnet.att.net, wildf15c@hotmail.com, wpairprt@tdstelme.net, garvey@attbi.com, bncdenham@peakonline.com, jefflinebaugh@earthlink.net, pino1@compuserve.com, RAre406906@aol.com, CEParaiso@aol.com, JGoolsby@umaryland.edu, keith.goolsby@eds.com, moreira_thais@hotmail.com, vicky@shippei.com, paraisoam@surfbest.net, EdrisDee@aol.com, Ckelso17@earthlink.net, Bigj10@msn.com, gaf127enl@msn.com, MDSHELLEY@aol.com, yakjock@msn.com, walterfricke@yahoo.com, finleycj6@juno.com, BDorsey777@aol.com, Swifty305@aol.com, tcalloway@datatechnique.com, paulcfitzgerald@attbi.com, mason.t@worldnet.att.net, radialpower@cox.net --> Yak-List message posted by: cjpilot710@aol.com Friends & Family, Just listened to the President speech. Soon the fighting men and women over there will step, for us, into harms way. I ask that you say a prayer, under whatever faith you believe in. Or have just quite reflection for those, our finest, over there. You may be for or against the war. Don't matter. They deserve our considerations and prayers. Jim "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" Benjamin Franklin 1759 "With my shield, or on it" Trojan Warriors BC


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:10:43 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: 48 hours
    KROwen@charter.net, mentor@cheshir.com, PaulSanden@aol.com, Ruthcopes@aol.com, artziggy6@yahoo.com, carriesuerowe@yahoo.com, paulbeth.mullen@worldnet.att.net, wildf15c@hotmail.com, wpairprt@tdstelme.net, garvey@attbi.com, bncdenham@peakonline.com, jefflinebaugh@earthlink.net, pino1@compuserve.com, RAre406906@aol.com, CEParaiso@aol.com, JGoolsby@umaryland.edu, keith.goolsby@eds.com, moreira_thais@hotmail.com, vicky@shippei.com, paraisoam@surfbest.net, EdrisDee@aol.com, Ckelso17@earthlink.net, Bigj10@msn.com, gaf127enl@msn.com, MDSHELLEY@aol.com, yakjock@msn.com, walterfricke@yahoo.com, finleycj6@juno.com, BDorsey777@aol.com, Swifty305@aol.com, tcalloway@datatechnique.com, paulcfitzgerald@attbi.com, mason.t@worldnet.att.net
    From: Barry Hancock <radialpower@cox.net>
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Barry Hancock <radialpower@cox.net> Amen. We will pray not only for our troops, but for *all* the souls that will be lost, and that their families and their friends might be comforted in this difficult time. Barry On Monday, March 17, 2003, at 07:57 PM, cjpilot710@aol.com wrote: > Friends & Family, > > Just listened to the President speech.=A0 > Soon the fighting men and women over there will step, for us, into > harms way. > > I ask that you say a prayer, under whatever faith you believe in.=A0 > Or have just quite reflection for those, our finest, over there. > > You may be for or against the war.=A0 Don't matter. > They deserve our considerations and prayers. > > Jim > > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety, > deserve neither liberty nor safety" >=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Benjamin Franklin 1759 > "With my shield, or on it" >=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Trojan Warriors BC > >


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:13:00 PM PST US
    From: "dabear" <dabear@damned.org>
    Subject: Re: bent props and other things
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "dabear" <dabear@damned.org> Jim/Mr. Goolsby, Pappy, You continue to make me glad I joined the YPA. I get to hang out with some of the nicest people, who I respect and learn from, and have a great time doing. You and others within the organization allow me to learn from your skills, your experience, and yes even your mistakes. I come away from every single clinic, with at least one new lesson, skill, or technique. Frequently with more than one. Thank you for sharing your skills, training, and experience at the YPA clinics. Respectfully, Al DeVere ----- Original Message ----- From: <cjpilot710@aol.com> Subject: Yak-List: bent props and other things > --> Yak-List message posted by: cjpilot710@aol.com > > Some of you know me personally and my back ground. For those who don't, > briefly I started flying when I was 15. The year I turned 23, I had 3,000 > hours and my ATP. I now have over 23,000 hours. I have every Boeing type > rateing except for the B737. I now have over a 1,000 hours in the CJ-6. A > few years ago, I pulled the gear out from under my perfectly good CJ-6 while > taxing in. Those who were there, know how badly that effected me. It was > the first time I have ever bent an airplane, ever. > > With in a few days, sensing a need, I had no less than 3 of my contemporaries > call, and 'welcome me to the "Club". These were very professional high time > pilots. In the years sense, I've seen Navy trained professionals, who had > never flown a fixed gear airplane, land with the gear up. I've heard of > decorated military jocks, kill notches on their belt, land their perfectly > good F-"Sweet Jesus!" gear up. I have come to the conclusion that as long as > there are retractable gear, human beings will make gear up landings. Its a > given law of the universe. > > Every time I hear these stories and safety studies prove it, there is always > an extenuating circumstance that mixed its self into normal operations. The > military with deep pockets, can dictate fantastic training programs and > unlimited gas from the pumps for it. We just don't have that. The mind set > of that military experience, though some may think it infallible, can't money > wise and personality wise, work on the civilian ramp. BUT what does carry > over are the causes, for "dumb ass" tricks like landing with the gear up. > BTW those are usually the first words uttered by the offender. > > What we learn from this, is that screw ups, like these, happen when something > different is happening. Something has been added to the situation out of the > norm. THIS is the time to be really careful. Formation flying, working > airshows, practicing emergencies, or flying into a strange field with your > warbird, and noticing a shapely blond looking in your direction, add to the > distractions that can lead to bent birds. > > Some pilots handle these distractions handily. The more hours under the > belt, the better you get, BUT THERE'S NO DAMN GUARANTEE! Training? Yes, it > helps. It does a lot of good. BUT it is still not a guarantee. > > Get well verist with your airplane's handling and its systems. Know them > hands down. Understand what you are doing when you are performing the > emergency procedures if you need too. Make sure you know what is expected of > you during a formation and know what YOU are capable of doing during any > flight. Than try to improve. > > The screw ups are always waiting out there for the unsuspecting pilot. Like > the legendary Gremlins of WW2, they sit on the airport fences or hangar > conners. They hid in the mist with the hills and other hard things. And > they don't give a tinkers damn on how long you've been around. They'll catch > you when you're not looking. > > > Jim Goolsby > > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety, > deserve neither liberty nor safety" > Benjamin Franklin 1759 > "With my shield, or on it" > Trojan Warriors BC > > ==== > ==== > ==== > ==== > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   yak-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list
  • Browse Yak-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --