Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:19 AM - [PLEASE READ!] "What's my Contribution used for?" (Matt Dralle)
2. 03:36 AM - Re: Mooney (Brian Lloyd)
3. 03:41 AM - Re: Spammers on the Yak-list (Brian Lloyd)
4. 04:45 AM - Re: Mooney (Ernie)
5. 06:00 AM - YAK vs CJ (Duncan)
6. 08:42 AM - Re: Tip Tank Lights (gpa)
7. 12:28 PM - Noted today (Doug Sapp)
8. 01:36 PM - Re: Noted today (Steve & Donna Hanshew)
9. 02:27 PM - Yak 52 for sale (Tom Johnson)
10. 07:06 PM - Re: Yak-List Digest: 10 Msgs - 11/23/03 (Lou Dakos)
11. 09:14 PM - Re: Yak 52 for sale (N13472@aol.com)
12. 09:14 PM - Re: Yak 52 for sale (N13472@aol.com)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | [PLEASE READ!] "What's my Contribution used for?" |
--> Yak-List message posted by: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com>
Dear Listers,
A few Listers have asked me recently, "What's my Contribution used for?",
and that's a valid question. Here are just a few examples of what your
direct List support enables... It provides for the expensive,
business-class, high-speed Internet connection used on the List, insuring
maximum performance and minimal contention when accessing List
services. It pays for the regular system hardware and software upgrades
enabling the highest performance possible for services such as the Archive
Search Engine and List Browser. It pays for 15+ years worth of on line
archive data available for instant random access. And, it offsets the many
hours spent writing, developing, and maintaining the custom applications
that power this List Service such as the List Browse, Search Engine, and
Photoshare.
But most importantly, your List Contribution enables a forum where you and
your peers can communicate freely in an environment that is free from
moderation, censorship, advertising, commercialism, SPAM, and computer
viruses. How many places on the Internet can you make all those statements
about these days? I will venture to say - next to none...
It is YOUR CONTRIBUTION that directly enables these many desirable aspects
of this most valuable List service. Please support it today with your List
Contribution. Its the best investment you can make in your Sport - BAR NONE!
Email List Contribution Web Site:
http://www.matronics.com/contribution
Thank you for your support!
Matt Dralle
Email List Administrator
Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551
925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle@matronics.com Email
http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft
do not archive
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
Ernie wrote:
> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Ernie" <ernest.martinez@oracle.com>
>
> Here this oughta change the topic.
>
> Which is better the CJ or the YAK? :)
Hey Ernie! Didja notice that I left that out of my list of topics to argue about?
<sigh> Some people just never exhibit any learning behavior.
--
Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201
brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802
+1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax
GMT-4
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Spammers on the Yak-list |
--> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
Barry Hancock wrote:
> --> Yak-List message posted by: Barry Hancock <radialpower@cox.net>
>
>>How the hell the Mooneys, Bonanzas and other spam cans get on this
>>list? :)
>>
>>Jim Goolsby
>
>
> Well, we've allowed Brian Lloyd to remain on this list for years knowing
> his project CJ was really a spam can in disguise...
Hey, the FAEDEC is done and the pressurization system is taking just a bit longer
than planned. We have substituted a PT-6 for the radial to make operations
simpler. Since most people want to take their friends along we have widened
the fuselage to accommodate more passengers. Oh, and the name has changed. We
now call it the Nanchang "Meridian".
> Hal Morely is going with a glass cockpit, I think he even mentioned
> something about fly-by-wire and a Russian knock off of the APG-77. And
> you thought the cold war was over? :)
Yeah, and stability augmentation systems are nice too. Hal and I have been exchanging
engineering data for some time now.
--
Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201
brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802
+1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax
GMT-4
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Ernie" <ernest.martinez@oracle.com>
You should know by now, I write for effect :)
Ernie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Lloyd" <brian@lloyd.com>
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Mooney
> --> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
>
> Ernie wrote:
>
> > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Ernie" <ernest.martinez@oracle.com>
> >
> > Here this oughta change the topic.
> >
> > Which is better the CJ or the YAK? :)
>
> Hey Ernie! Didja notice that I left that out of my list of topics to
argue about?
>
> <sigh> Some people just never exhibit any learning behavior.
>
> --
>
> Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza, Suite 201
> brian@lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802
> +1.340.998.9447 - voice +1.360.838.9669 - fax
> GMT-4
>
>
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Duncan" <Duncan1574@hotmail.com>
Sure the YAK drops like a lead manhole cover and has a higher roll rate, but
the CJ has um um um ::fingerpointstoheaven:: a built-in handhold!
But in the end, it all comes down to the better pilot.
Russ "Air Boss" Dycus
Red Star Pilot's Assoc.
http://yakpilots.org
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Tip Tank Lights |
--> Yak-List message posted by: "gpa" <catfsh4u@bellsouth.net>
Dennis:
Much appreciated.
Thanks!
Greg Arnold
----- Original Message -----
From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <adsavar@gte.net>
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Tip Tank Lights
> --> Yak-List message posted by: "A. Dennis Savarese" <adsavar@gte.net>
>
> Greg,
> Take a look at the email I copied you on to the overhaul facility that did
> your airplane. Hopefully, I will have an answer shortly.
> Dennis
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "gpa" <catfsh4u@bellsouth.net>
> To: <yak-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: Yak-List: Tip Tank Lights
>
>
> > --> Yak-List message posted by: "gpa" <catfsh4u@bellsouth.net>
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > Anyone know the make and model of the landing light being used in the
Yak
> 52 tip tanks? There is no marking on the bulb. They look like the round
car
> lights on a jaguar. I would like to find a source for replacement lights.
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Greg Arnold
> > N624PT
> >
> >
>
>
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Doug Sapp" <rvfltd@televar.com>
T-34 Wing Separates
An Airworthiness Directive was issued concerning possible metal fatigue in
T-34 wing spars after a crash in 1999, and now the FAA is checking
maintenance records on a Texas Air Aces T-34 that lost a wing during
aerobatic maneuvers last Wednesday. The tandem military trainer, built in
1965 by Beechcraft, lost its right wing at about 7,000 feet where company
President Don Wylie and William J. Eisenhauer were doing some flying. Both
died when the plane crashed in a wooded area near Lake Conroe. Texas Air
Aces provides simulated aerial combat rides and trains pilots in upset
recovery. Another T-34 was also involved in the flight but returned safely
to the airport. Company officials told the Houston Chronicle that they had
"complied fully" with the AD but declined to say what, specifically, had
been done to the airplane that crashed. NTSB spokesman Alex Lemishko said he
found signs of a possible stress fracture in the forward spar of the wing
and determined the wing came off in backwards and upwards motion. Lemishko
also declined to comment on whether any work had been done on the crash
plane's spars but said he'd be going through the logs to see if the AD
requirements had been carried out. Other T-34s are permitted to fly while
the investigation is underway.
Always yakin
Doug Sapp
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Steve & Donna Hanshew" <dhanshew@cinci.rr.com>
Yeah Doug,
Bill was a DC9 Standards Pilot at Airborne. My friend Brett Hunter was in
the second ship and saw it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Sapp" <rvfltd@televar.com>
Subject: Yak-List: Noted today
> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Doug Sapp" <rvfltd@televar.com>
>
> T-34 Wing Separates
> An Airworthiness Directive was issued concerning possible metal fatigue
in
> T-34 wing spars after a crash in 1999, and now the FAA is checking
> maintenance records on a Texas Air Aces T-34 that lost a wing during
> aerobatic maneuvers last Wednesday. The tandem military trainer, built in
> 1965 by Beechcraft, lost its right wing at about 7,000 feet where company
> President Don Wylie and William J. Eisenhauer were doing some flying. Both
> died when the plane crashed in a wooded area near Lake Conroe. Texas Air
> Aces provides simulated aerial combat rides and trains pilots in upset
> recovery. Another T-34 was also involved in the flight but returned safely
> to the airport. Company officials told the Houston Chronicle that they had
> "complied fully" with the AD but declined to say what, specifically, had
> been done to the airplane that crashed. NTSB spokesman Alex Lemishko said
he
> found signs of a possible stress fracture in the forward spar of the wing
> and determined the wing came off in backwards and upwards motion. Lemishko
> also declined to comment on whether any work had been done on the crash
> plane's spars but said he'd be going through the logs to see if the AD
> requirements had been carried out. Other T-34s are permitted to fly while
> the investigation is underway.
>
> Always yakin
> Doug Sapp
>
>
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Tom Johnson" <tjohnson@cannonaviation.com>
1983 Yak 52, aux fuel, lots of extras.
Nice solid plane.
Serious inquiries please email for details.
**********************************
Thomas Johnson
Senior Account Executive
1983 Yak 52
Tel: 800-851-2997
Fax: 480-951-1455
Cell: 602-628-2701
E: tjohnson@cannonaviation.com
ADDRESS CHANGE: New Suite # is 204
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Yak-List Digest: 10 Msgs - 11/23/03 |
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Lou Dakos" <lou_dakos@bordermail.com.au>
Frank
I think you would have to catch his arse befor you could wax it and what do
you do with it then I wonder.
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Yak 52 for sale |
--> Yak-List message posted by: N13472@aol.com
WHY ??????
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Yak 52 for sale |
--> Yak-List message posted by: N13472@aol.com
WHY ????
Tom Elliott
CJ-6 N63727
Sandy Valley NV
3L2
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|